Poll to Freep: Who would be worse for the country? John McCain or Barack Obama

Libertarian Party ^ | June 8, 2008 | the eagle has landed

[TheEaglehasLanded]

Tough call but went with Barry Obama

[hole_n_one]

Tough call.....

I hope you didn't hurt yourself too badly while deciding.

It should be B. Hussein O. in a landslide.

[robomatik]

freeped.

[Fiddlstix]

Who would be worse for the country?

President John McCain

37% (282 votes)

President Barack Obama

63% (476 votes)

Total votes: 758

[Swordfished]

It depends on the time period:

Short-term Obama would obviously be worse.
Long-term McCain would probably be worse because it would be the irreversible transformation of the Republican Party into the Democrat-lite Party.

[Tennessee Nana]

BWAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAA

[SandRat]

Who would be worse for the country? (756 votes)
President John McCain
280 (37%)

President Barack Obama
476 (62%)

[babygene]

“It depends on the time period:”

I kind of agree with you.

[Crazieman]

John McCain would reward the behavior of the RINOs, encouraging more. Plus he’d destroy the country.

Without a party for conservatives, the country fall.

Obama would destroy the country on his own.

Can I vote both?

[KingofZion]

It is hard to fanthom either could do worse than GWB.

[wafflehouse]

C. all of the above

[Fichori]

Polls

Jun 08, 2008

Who would be worse for the country?

President John McCain

36% (286 votes)

President Barack Obama

64% (506 votes)

Total votes: 792

[Dustbunny]

done

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

This country will survive OBAMBI but will not survive mcnutts.Mcnutts will take the party further left or make it more of RAT LIGHT.Judical nominees?Who in their right minds thinks mcnutts nominees will be conservative when he is not conservative himself?Let OBAMBI/ratparty wreck it just like OLE JIMAH did and then we take the pubby back from the rinos.

[YHAOS]

"Tough call but went with Barry Obama "

This is similar to asking "What is worse for the country; pestilence or famine?" Pick your poison, but your only option is the choice of poisons.

[TheEaglehasLanded]

That’s my belief too, because McCain is already shown he won’t fight for Conservative Judges when the odds are in his favor.

The deck will be stacked against him and he is likely to appoint libs that will be said later, look at this conservative court, the Republican Presidents nominated them all.

My reply to that is who controlled the Senate at the time and what kind of Judge came out, Clinton got Ginsberg and I believe Breyer before the Dems lost the Senate in Nov, 1994. Breyer may have been afterward but Hatch told Clinton we know these people are libs but it’s your choice. They didn’t mount any oppositon to them.

[familyop]

"If you support my oppositions position you are radical, right wing, redneck, racist. Otherwise known as the 4 R's of the Republican Party."

I'm not a "right wing" fascist, "redneck," "racist," pimp, gambler, drug addict, thief, swindler, family buster (feminist/romanticist/corporate) or commie sympathizer (free traitor). [...covered the interests of just about all of the political parties--large and small--there.]

I'm an old fashioned, morally conservative American. I'm not rich and don't have a party.

[matthew fuller]

President John McCain

35% (292 votes)
President Barack Obama

65% (541 votes)
Total votes: 833

[ncalburt]

I hate to break the news to you. Obama and his Marxist buddies are the Dem party of 1992 or 1980 These Marxists plan to rewrite every single law to insure they stay in power for ever. They will wipe out the electoral college,give 30 million illegal instant voting rights,shut down the new media , and talk radio. These radical Marxists like Obama , Ayers, Wright, Moveon.org , ACCORN ,and ANSWER , and Farrakhan play for keeps. The old dem party is dead . This the a radical Socialist party. Wake up your great idea about letting the radical left take control our great country is irrational.

[LibertyRocks]

In what possible ways? Do you even know what Obama stands for?