1 posted on
06/05/2008 9:09:39 PM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
He has told reporters that he changed his mind after hearing from retired military officers concerned that climate change will trigger political upheaval around the world and draw the United States into new conflicts.what a bunch of Bravo Sierra. give us a break
2 posted on
06/05/2008 9:13:29 PM PDT by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Red Steel
3 posted on
06/05/2008 9:13:30 PM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
To: Red Steel
Bottom line? The global warming hoax bill is a massive tax increase on the American people.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
4 posted on
06/05/2008 9:15:48 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Red Steel
5 posted on
06/05/2008 9:17:06 PM PDT by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: Red Steel
Republicans said Reid broke a deal to bring several of President Bush's judicial nominees to a voteDingy is a slimy bastard. More here.
7 posted on
06/05/2008 9:22:03 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Who wins doesn't matter. They're all liberals. Spend your time and money to take back Congress.)
To: Red Steel
But the legislation's supporters cite studies that forecast a much smaller impact. The Bush administration's Energy Information Agency, for example, puts the additional monthly cost to consumers at only $2.50 a month by 2030 and $6 by 2050.Are you kidding me!!! There must of been some truly wacky assumptions, perhaps cold fusion powers the country, to come up with numbers like that. If the costs are so low then people will not change their behavior and CO2 admissions will not change.
8 posted on
06/05/2008 9:22:57 PM PDT by
C19fan
To: Red Steel
In my youth it was Hubert Humphrey. These days it’s Bush and Warner and Lieberman. Why can such blow-hards do so much damage, then die leaving producers who never even knew them to do so much heavy lifting?
11 posted on
06/05/2008 9:31:30 PM PDT by
stevem
To: Red Steel
Let’s see:
1. Cap and Trade policies for reducing pollution are more efficient than command and control by government policies.
2. No policy is good when it is reacting to a hoax.
So as 1 indicates, IF we had a warming problem great enough to accept the harm to the economy that reducing CO2 levels would cause, Cap and Trade would be an efficient policy. However a policy changed that would hurt the economy due to a hoax is a bad idea.
As an aside, why do people in countries who would benefit from global warming like Canada and Sweden support policies reduce it?????
13 posted on
06/05/2008 9:39:50 PM PDT by
JLS
To: Red Steel
We could really use this bill to show how stupid the rats are, but wait - RINO McCain is in favor of it too.
Nevermind.
14 posted on
06/05/2008 9:40:50 PM PDT by
Slump Tester
(What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
To: Red Steel
19 posted on
06/05/2008 9:58:23 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
To: Red Steel
“Warner, whose retirement in January will end a 30-year Senate career, opposed a similar bill in 2005. He has told reporters that he changed his mind after hearing from retired military officers concerned that climate change will trigger political upheaval around the world and draw the United States into new conflicts.”
“So I decided to destroy the economy”
This guy is delusional.
22 posted on
06/05/2008 10:24:57 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Been here before)
To: Red Steel
If you like $5/gal, Thank Congress.
Pray for W and Our Troops
23 posted on
06/05/2008 10:26:10 PM PDT by
bray
(If everyone hates you, you must be doin something right?)
To: Red Steel
I can’t even express the degree of contempt I have for the proponents of this utter crap. No debate, just vote into being one the most comprehensive expansions of Federal government since the New Deal. Never mind the economic effects, the feasibility, or anything else. Just vote it into being slam bam, thank you ma’am.
These aren’t just deluded liberal morons, these are genuine certified Stalinist collectivist idealogues determined to bring the US to its’ economic knees. Now comes Barbara Boxer! Easily one of the two or three stupidest members of Congress by any measure, her support alone is enough to make the sheer boneheadedness of this crap self-evident on its face.
This stuff genuinely scares me. Who among us has the energy to fight this crap and the dozens of other pieces of dangerous redux Stalinism nonsense each and every time they may be introduced as potential bills...next time, no doubt, as an obscure amendment to some bill authorizing something utterly trivial so as to become law completely under the radar, by stealth.
DAMN these people, damn them to hell.
To: Red Steel
He has told reporters that he changed his mind after hearing from retired military officers concerned that climate change will trigger political upheaval around the world and draw the United States into new conflicts.I don't believe a word of this. What cr*p. Or maybe he's referring to Westley Clark - he's enough of a fool to make up something like this.
26 posted on
06/05/2008 11:20:17 PM PDT by
hsalaw
To: Red Steel; CygnusXI; Fiddlstix; Timeout; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; ...
To: Red Steel
We need to give Mitch McConnell, Republican Senate Minority Leader, a big vote of thanks for his efforts to block the madness that is the Warner/Lieberman CO2 Cap & Trade bill.
The man is a genius at political infighting and is, almost singlehandedly, thwarting the Reid/Pelosi march to a Socialist America.
31 posted on
06/06/2008 8:12:16 AM PDT by
HardStarboard
(Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson