http://www.youtube.com/user/YadVashem
http://www.truthusa.com/IRAN.html
#
OPINION:
WONDERING OUT LOUD: Does Obama really understand Iran and the potential threat Iran is/can be to Israel, the U.S.A. and the other parts of the world?
It will take more than a good speech by Obama to deal with the problems/potential problems Iran presents to the world.
“the pander pivot”
It is unbelievable that his cult followers are this stupid. When they say they are ready for change, it must mean watching this dolt cross dress for any occasion.
“People need to wake up to what an Obama presidency would mean for our country and the world!”
He isn’t going to win 5 states. Hillary is smart. She is going to let the Republicans smear him until he decides to quit. Then she will reluctantly step in to take his place.
I figure mid to late October, when she won’t need much funding and won’t have to debate. And Obama will pay for it all by paying off Hillary’s campaign debt.
Tinfoil hat? Probably. Would you put this past the Clinton’s? No.
Obama is looking to pick up support of those who are wary of McCain, but he’ll be Iran’s friend, and you can bet on that! This guy is slick. He knows he HAS to look as if he knows Iran is a threat until he gets elected, then he can do as he pleases! Any RINO or other Republican who votes for Obama is willfully deceived. He’s been very up front about his beliefs.
The money may not matter this time, since Barry has raised many millions from the Internet. Someone needs to look at those contributions and see who is paying to swing the American elections. Barry has a phone bank in Gaza, real nice, huh?
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AmandaCarpenter/2008/05/13/palestinians_phonebank_for_obama
I’m somewhat confused (which is better than all the rest of the time): I saw just a minute or two of Obama speaking to AIPAC, getting some applause here and there, and then he said something like, “The war in Iraq is wrong because it has made Iran stronger, developing nuclear weapons, blah, blah...!)
Did I hear him correctly, and how could a statement like this fly at AIPAC?
mark
Of course all politicians pander to some extent. It’s part of the job description. However, this guy is up there with Kerry in the pandering department.
If you’re Jewish and you’re wondering if Obama is a friend of Israel just ask yourself who is supporting him. Let’s see, we have Syria, Hamas and Hezbolla who have come out for him. While Bush talks about appeasment to terrorists in front of Israel’s Knessett and Obama assumes it’s him. That’s all you need to know.
Lies and deceptions are required when in jihad against the infidels.
Just one of the things B. Hussein Osama learned in kindergarten.
Obammy will lie to anyone to succeed in his bid.
Now that the two parties have finally selected their presidential candidates, it is time for a sober-- if not grim-- assessment of where we are.Not since 1972 have we been presented with two such painfully inadequate candidates. When election day came that year, I could not bring myself to vote for either George McGovern or Richard Nixon. I stayed home.
This year, none of us has that luxury. While all sorts of gushing is going on in the media, and posturing is going on in politics, the biggest national sponsor of terrorism in the world-- Iran-- is moving step by step toward building a nuclear bomb.
The point when they get that bomb will be the point of no return. Iran's nuclear bomb will be the terrorists' nuclear bomb-- and they can make 9/11 look like child's play.
. . . we do not have the luxury of waiting for our ideal candidate or of indulging our emotions by voting for some third party candidate to show our displeasure-- at the cost of putting someone in the White House who is not up to the job.
Senator John McCain has been criticized in this column many times. But, when all is said and done . . . The choice between him and Barack Obama should be a no-brainer.
Obama And McCain (Thomas Sowell)
GOPUSA ^ | June 5, 2008 | Thomas Sowell
I am reminded of when Romney was running earlier this year. He talked a good line, but he was shown to have pander-pivoted on a number of issues, to be acceptable to Conservatives.
I guess it depends on which side of the fence you’re pander-pivoting on, whether it’s acceptable or not.
Today McCain pander pivots on judicial appointments. I don’t see too many people taking him to task over it.
On the issue of illegal immigration he’s pefected the pander-pivot pander-pivot position, a double reverse of sorts. About all I hear from his supporters is ooos and ahhhs over it.
Pander-pivoting, the 2008 contribution to the political lexicon.
Obama will lose both ears to wind shear if he tries to turn right too fast.