Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/30/2008 1:02:05 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER is so wise! Like no one else figured this out many months ago?


2 posted on 05/30/2008 1:06:23 AM PDT by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Wow, I just watched Recount and thought that rules are unfair?

hmm.


3 posted on 05/30/2008 1:12:06 AM PDT by MartinStyles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
She's still got a shot at VP.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

5 posted on 05/30/2008 1:16:09 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

I am amzed that typical democrat does not see inherent flaw in nominating process.
If party leaders do not like nominee that the people choose, they use super delegates to pick another better candidate.
Thereby disenfranchising every voter.
Oddly democrats keep going back for more.


6 posted on 05/30/2008 1:19:56 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

There was another thread based on an article from the Chicago Trib today describing Obama’s first electoral win (actually, his first campaign), where he won essentially by challenging the petitions of all the other Dem candidates just before the deadline and was able to knock all of them out - so fast that even one who was going to file a federal lawsuit didn’t have time to respond before the deadline fell. He was impressively vicious and bloodthirsty.

The only thing he knows is politics - he’s an idiot about everything else. But knowing politics and having a truly ruthless desire for power may be sufficient.


15 posted on 05/30/2008 2:39:05 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

I’m going to simplfy things for the author. People were’nt voting FOR osamaobama they were voting AGAINST hillary. The only candidate that had ANY appeal as an alternative was osamaobama. Even Dems as collectively stupid as they are realized that dodd, edwards, richardson were not a viable alternative to hillary. osmaaobama just happened to be in the right place at the right time, and he benefitted from a accomodating media.


19 posted on 05/30/2008 4:24:19 AM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Having all the advantages, Hillary always assumed she would win. All the pundits and prognosticators said so. After all who would challenge her? A unknown rookie black Senator with no money? Get off the dope.

But here we are. Who would have thunk it?

21 posted on 05/30/2008 5:08:01 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Tad Devine is just a tad TOO Devine!! Actually he’s a mean, SNARLING dog!


22 posted on 05/30/2008 5:26:27 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Barack is Princess Nancy’s Bitch


23 posted on 05/30/2008 5:27:51 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson