Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"an effort that was designed to obviously appease the homosexual community give access to all public restrooms by people of the opposite gender," Focus on the Family founder James Dobson said "
1 posted on 05/29/2008 6:43:14 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76

Yup, that there Ritter shore is a moderate!


2 posted on 05/29/2008 6:43:53 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Socialism is the feudalism of the future.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

the first sheman I see in the men’s room is going to be asked to leave. perhaps in colorful language.


3 posted on 05/29/2008 6:46:07 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The road to hell is paved with euphemisms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

4 posted on 05/29/2008 6:47:27 PM PDT by jwalburg (I live in the 57th state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Hmm..why can I hear Rick Warren applauding from here?


6 posted on 05/29/2008 6:50:53 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Yeah sure. They never do anything in secret. Sarc.

We should make this year of mass cleaning of our states and federal government.


7 posted on 05/29/2008 6:55:24 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

So how are women going to feel knowing that any sicko guy can go into the ladies room with his cell phone camera and click away to his heart’s desire. These people are really degenerate.


8 posted on 05/29/2008 6:58:06 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Colorado should have closed the borders to anyone from California year ago.


10 posted on 05/29/2008 7:37:03 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Ritter signs controversial anti-discrimination bill
By John Ingold
The Denver Post

Article Last Updated: 05/29/2008 06:22:44 PM MDT

Gov. Bill Ritter today quietly signed a controversial bill expanding the prohibition of sexual-orientation-based discrimination, over the vocal opposition of conservative Christian groups like Focus on the Family.

The bill bans discrimination based on a person's religious belief or sexual orientation - including transgender people - in places of public accommodation, housing practices, family planning services and 20 other public spheres. Such prohibitions are already in place with regard to race.

"I think it's a step in the right direction for Coloradans and civil rights," said Sen. Jennifer Veiga, a Denver Democrat who sponsored the bill.

Ritter signed Senate Bill 200 this afternoon in his office, without any of the public ceremonies and news releases that came with six other bills he signed today. His spokesman, Evan Dreyer, said the governor was not deliberately trying to keep the signing quiet. In all, Ritter signed 20 bills today, Dreyer said.

"There were hundreds and hundreds of bills that were passed by the legislature this year," Dreyer said. "We do many ceremonies and many announcements, but in reality we do just a fraction."

But no bill this year has seen the kind of heated post-session attacks that SB 200 has. Focus on the Family launched radio ads and a media campaign urging Ritter to veto the bill.

"The state legislature here in Colorado has frankly become just about as radical and extreme as the California Legislature, in an effort that was designed to obviously appease the homosexual community give access to all public restrooms by people of the opposite gender," Focus on the Family founder James Dobson said Wednesday on his regular radio broadcast, according to an online newsletter from the organization sent out later that day.

Opponents said the bill would have serious consequences, such as opening up Colorado public restrooms and locker rooms to all genders and transgender people, exposing children and women to sexual predators.

Dreyer said opponents were running a campaign of misinformation.

"The claims that are made in this campaign are not based in fact. They are based in fear," Dreyer said.

"All this does," Dreyer added, "is it brings across-the-board consistency to existing anti-discrimination laws."

Bruce DeBoskey, the regional director of the Anti-Defamation League, said the opposition's claims were exaggerated and applauded the signing.

"We think this is another important step in making Colorado safe and inclusive and welcoming to all those who live there," he said.

John Ingold: 303-954-1068 or jingold@denverpost.com

14 posted on 05/29/2008 9:02:45 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Let me guess, the pro-fag forces used Matthew Shepard in their appeals for this bill. Am I right?


17 posted on 05/29/2008 10:24:41 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

22 posted on 05/30/2008 6:51:19 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

One more reason to avoid public restrooms.


23 posted on 05/30/2008 6:52:50 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Opponents said the bill would have serious consequences, such as opening up Colorado public restrooms and locker rooms to all genders and transgender people, exposing children and women to sexual predators.

YIKES!

25 posted on 05/30/2008 8:30:32 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Who cares if women are sexually assaulted, raped or the victims of peeping toms so long as the government can make transgendered types try and feel better about themselves?


29 posted on 05/30/2008 9:53:46 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Would this also forbid kicking out of a public area same-sex couples engaged in public displays of affection?

One could argue that it protects sexual orientation, not expression, but I don't think that argument will be made.

30 posted on 05/30/2008 10:56:33 AM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson