Posted on 05/26/2008 9:30:06 PM PDT by Democrats hate too much
This was the 3rd time since March she mentioned the assassination of RFK.
“This was the 3rd time since March she mentioned the assassination of RFK.”
It must be the non-sociopath in me, but my first thought when I read that she’d mentioned the RFK assassination wasn’t that she was hinting that the same thing could occur in June, it was that she was making a veiled reference that RFK was killed by a Muslim and trying to link Obama to that event by earlier (by birth) association.
"Email from Obama Supporter to Obama Listserver ################################## I think Hillary is having a nervous breakdown, and she has a following of supporters who don't even realize that she's having a break down. . . . ."
yitbos
I think my tagline says it all.
She’s been having a nervous breakdown since Lewinsky.
Bump for an important article on exposing Hilery, the Red Queen. Not the source too. Even Democrats are starting to wake up on the dangers of allowing her anywhere near power.
That wouldn't have been accurate.
I don’t think she slipped up. The Democrate party is one which votes for the next sociopath and plead innocence and hate if their cause for their Che, Castro or Hitler is not defended. They are the advocates of evil, and that is PC.
Since Hilary could not denounce those ways and thus Obama (one more radical than her), she could only show more radicalism than him via another way. She conjured up the witches which control and manipulate this election and probably asked for some advice. From her death-oriented point of view of the adult whore, ie. irresponsible yet feminist in authority of adult over “children” who should not question her, she has made an irresponsible statement as such adult.
She only slipped a little bit in form, but not in substance. She did not express well enough the “confidence” of the irresponsible whore who “humanisticaly” deserves her entitled feminist respect... and she is adored after all.
But that slip up is not so bad. Damage control is made by the leftist’s press false outrage, and it makes her look “clumsy” and cute at it almost.
What she did is perfectly logical. She is bringing more death, and, just like the Monica scandal made it all so “proper” and “good looking” to lie in court and betray sexualy people around, it has fed further the fantasies of such psychologists who fantasize of maturity and of intellectual untouchability, moralization status entitlement and “irresponsible ‘cool’ like adult” attitude.
The world will learn that God and the Bible is no fantasy and not childlish, and, guilt is not either feeding much of fantasies. Look at the log in your eye before you remove the speck in the other’s, indeed.
Hmmm. So it's just about the abstraction known as Clinton's political persona? Not the entire person? In that case, it certainly isn't a diagnosis, it's more like a metaphor or a smear.
It's no fun having to defend Clinton, but really now, why spend all that time and ink depicting her as a sociopath if you don't really want to be on record as believing it, and if you disclaim your own words in the end?
There are no part persons. If she's a sociopath, she's not just a political sociopath successfully compartmentalized by a normal person. Or if she is, why not go with the older metaphor and call her possessed?
Proponents of character disorder theory, criminal profiling, and sociopatholgical theory and practice see these taxonomies as far as real-life applications as overlapping and their various traits as existing on a continuum.
Oh, I see! There's a continuuuuuum. And she is at milepost number what?
With a continuuuuuum, you can label...er, taxonomize anyone! You don't have to prove anything, or even be precise, because everything's "overlapping." Just affect the objective, scientific style, wield the language of science, and you can change minds. Or whatever they now call minds, and I'm certain it's imaginative.
THE DIARIST: Is a college English instructor
Nuff said!
whose graduate and undergraduate work included courses such as "literature and psychoanalysis" and so she easily assumes the role of amateur psychologist.
Ok then, forget it --
Has been a candidate in two graduate psychology programs,
Really, I get it now
one in Forensic Psychology, but finished neither.
Stop, you're killing me!
Did complete the requirements for a two year degree in "The Administration of Justice" and has been an intern in juvenile probation.
Bwahahahahaha!!
She will always answer to "Dr. Voberry" with alacrity and great joy
is a typical marker for fuzzy feely liberalism. It's in the standard diagnostic manual; no special page, rather somewhere along a continuuuuum of the manual.
DISCLAIMER: Just sayin'.
The BEST thing about this is that NOW Obama will NOT BE ASSASSINIATED!! There was a strong chance before because they will do ANYTHING to win, but she exposed it, so now Obama is safe from the Clintonistas!
The truth is the democrat party, is and always has been, Machiavellian at it’s core. Their party has never been concerned about the clinton’s pathology because they kept winning but the charm of their ‘golden couple’ has finally worn off.
The democrats are now asking themselves is this all we have?
The clinton’s have become pathetic, old and past their prime, actors, in constant need of ‘cosmetic surgery’. Even their publicist, the democrat’s Main Stream Media, are finding it harder and harder to promote a positive image of the clinton’s and have finally given up to create a new and improved alternative.
The democrats are grasping at the final straw by going with Obama, an American of African descent, because they have no option left to them, they have been the only people who have been blindly loyal to the party.
The difference this time is the Obama’s have no allusions about the white power brokers of the party, they know they have been used and abused for generations and, in the end, the democrats will lose the control over their most important base.
Not “successfully deceived”, “willfully ignorant”, emphasis on “willfull”.
Example, remember the feminists, who probably wouldn’t willinging come within 10 feet of any male genitalia, declaring that they should all be on their knees for Bill Clinton for “keeping abortion legal”?
Then old (I will mind my manners here) Teddy Kennedy uprooted her New York Senator — Bobby Kennedy 1968 campaign “I can do it better” by anointing Obama as the reincarnation of the former JFK totally ignoring Hillary's campaign.
There is no doubt that Hillary is the epitome of many well known high IQ masterminds but this was NOT a political gaff as being portrayed... Old Teddy got some bad news and Hillary sent him a get well message.
Quotes for the other two?
Rational people with common sense may refer to others who stayed in the race, but those actually in the race justifying why they’re still in the race don’t make references to the horrific reasons WHY those others finally dropped out. It’s called “tact”, and those without any usually don’t have other traits needed for the job of POTUS. It’s precisely the need for “well, strictly speaking she’s correct” (I’ve given it too in her defense, to my surprise) as a defense that’s indicative of the problem: such tangential implication are obvious to most people, and a viable candidate WON’T say such things because they know the meaning will be lost behind the innuendo.
I tend to agree with you. One thing I'm certain of is that Hillary is exhausted. When she was here in PA, she hit EVERY area and went to places I've never seen, even though I've lived here most of my life. Somedays she does 3 speaking engagements. I hate defending her too, but it's incredible how the media has turned on her and her husband. Evidently the media resents having to defend her and Bill all those years during the scandals...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.