Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US uses bullets ill-suited for new ways of war-(the old .223 vs .308 media style)
ap ^ | 5/26/08 | ap

Posted on 05/26/2008 5:13:56 AM PDT by Flavius

ASHINGTON: As Sgt. Joe Higgins patrolled the streets of Saba al-Bor, a tough town north of Baghdad, he was armed with bullets that had a lot more firepower than those of his 4th Infantry Division buddies.

As an Army sniper, Higgins was one of the select few toting an M14. The long-barreled rifle, an imposing weapon built for wars long past, spits out bullets larger and more deadly than the rounds that fit into the M4 carbines and M16 rifles that most soldiers carry.

"Having a heavy cartridge in an urban environment like that was definitely a good choice," says Higgins, who did two tours in Iraq and left the service last year. "It just has more stopping power

(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 223; 308; ammo; banglist; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
media cant get themselves out of the way between the lethal dum dum bullets of the .223 variety and thermonuclear warhead of 308 variety

i dont like media

1 posted on 05/26/2008 5:13:56 AM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Leave it to APee. In the right hands, a person can be killed with a phonograph needle.


2 posted on 05/26/2008 5:17:40 AM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
here are the brits using ill suited long rifles with 303's in urban environment in world WAR I

that being said here is happines


3 posted on 05/26/2008 5:17:43 AM PDT by Flavius (war gives peace its security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

It is especially ironic considering that WWI and WWII were, by and large, won with rifles chambered in .30-06 and .303, cartridges which are ballistically similar to the .308, and whose .30 caliber bullets are virtually the same.


4 posted on 05/26/2008 5:19:03 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

—my tagline applies , again-—


5 posted on 05/26/2008 5:19:37 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Nor do I.


6 posted on 05/26/2008 5:20:57 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Perhaps the writer should carry 300 rounds of each for a day and then get back to us on which he prefers.


7 posted on 05/26/2008 5:21:56 AM PDT by SirFishalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"The [M14] long-barreled rifle, an imposing weapon built for wars long past, spits out bullets larger and more deadly than the ...rifles that most soldiers carry."

I thought the .308 was a "NATO" round, therefore considered a "standard" military option.

The piece ended where it should have begun.

"One of the things I've discovered in guns is that damned near everyone is an expert," he says. "And they all have opinions."

8 posted on 05/26/2008 5:23:35 AM PDT by n230099 ("If you don't blame the camera for porn, then don't blame the gun for shootings". (Unknown))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I'll give you that .303 is ballistically similar to .308 - they use about the same size bullet (174 gr) and deliver MVs in the 23-2500 fps range.

But the .30'06 is quite another breed of cat. It's bigger, more powerful, and will throw a much larger bullet out there at the same velocities as the .308 or .303. There's also no mistaking that it's a more powerful round when you pull the trigger!

The SMLE was a fine rifle (I have a couple of them) but the Springfield and then the Garand delivered more punch.

9 posted on 05/26/2008 5:28:35 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

As I recall the switch (to the lighter bullet) was based upon (1) weight factors (2) a wounded soldier requires 2 more soldiers to carry him off the field so that it actually temporarily takes three people out of service (3)less recoil and muzzle rise for those less experienced marksmen.


10 posted on 05/26/2008 5:28:52 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

During my first 2 months in Viet Nam I carried an M-14, then some fool gunnery guy made me give it back and replaced it with an M-16. Seven months later, that P.O.S. M-16 jammed on me during a fire fight. I always considered the M-16 a downgrade to a less accurate, poorly designed piece of crap, with less stopping power.


11 posted on 05/26/2008 5:29:02 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
My dad threw away his M-1 carbine after an embarassing encounter with a German soldier, picked up a Garand from a dead G.I. and carried it the rest of the war.

He said he didn't mind the extra weight of the ammo one bit. Just threw the joker out of his deck of cards (see Willie & Joe).

12 posted on 05/26/2008 5:30:01 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
My husband had the same experience. He HATED the M-16, it jammed a lot - the magazine wouldn't feed right and it also jammed on empties.

Compared to the M-14 the early M-16s were junk. I understand they've improved it somewhat since.

13 posted on 05/26/2008 5:31:54 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
You didn't have the guys coming into the Army off the farm any more. They were flinching all over the place with the M-14.

Also add that there was a philosophy going around of putting more lead out as opposed to training marksmen. This turned out to be a bad idea - "spray and pray" has never worked very well.

14 posted on 05/26/2008 5:33:11 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

The SMLE had a knockdown advantage when using theMK7 loading.Ith Brits put an aluminun front core in the bullet,moving the center of balance to the rear.The bullet would tumble when hitting it’s target,the wounds were massive.


15 posted on 05/26/2008 5:33:33 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

An M-14 is great for punch at a distance. It’s probably not what you want in your hands if you’re clearing a building.

One size does not fit all.


16 posted on 05/26/2008 5:35:36 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (<===Non-bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot

“Perhaps the writer should carry 300 rounds of each for a day and then get back to us on which he prefers.”............

But the 5.56 rounds require 3 hits to accomplish what 1 hit does with the 7.62 round (from the Army FM on the M16). The standard load for 30-06 was 80 rounds.

So what are we accomplishing by carrying more ammo, the ability to make more noise?


17 posted on 05/26/2008 5:39:57 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
"This turned out to be a bad idea - "spray and pray" has never worked very well.

The idea was to wound (severely) the victim so their comrades would expend energy toting them for help.

18 posted on 05/26/2008 5:40:11 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot

Obvious Urban response. Give me the M-14 every day. I used one. I know what it will do. I know what that POS M-16 wont do. Once you have sprayed all your mosquito killer into the brush and you are out of ammo, because it wouldnt take the enemy down, you’ll be whining out the other side of your mouth and tryin to crawl back behind me to get some cover.


19 posted on 05/26/2008 5:40:57 AM PDT by Concho (IRS--Americas real terrorist organization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
Or wood pulp. I think the MK7 was adopted well before WWI, and when the aluminum (or aluminium) got scarce during the war the manufacturers switched to sawdust.

Solids are better for large game though.

20 posted on 05/26/2008 5:42:43 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson