Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChessExpert

Does that graph mean to imply the Top Individual income tax rate in 1955 was 90%?

How much would the change in rules about tax deductions skew this graph I wonder?


31 posted on 05/20/2008 9:11:04 AM PDT by IamConservative (Character: What you do when no one is looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: IamConservative

The top marginal tax rate in 1955 was 91% — down slightly from the 94% it was in the last 2 years of World War II.

It was 70% when Ronald Reagan took over the presidency in 1981. When he left office, it was 28%.

Difficult to figure out what deductions would mean to those old top marginal rates. The 28% achieved in 1988-90 was the result of agreements eliminating many tax-shelters and various other deductions but after Bush Senior gave up on “no new taxes” it was back to the old ways: upping marginal tax rates and bringing back the old deduction dodge. JMHO.


33 posted on 05/20/2008 10:06:26 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: IamConservative

Hahah, was wondering the same thing! There is a flaw in the model here or WSJ is somehow misintepreting what the research means.


39 posted on 05/20/2008 11:54:12 AM PDT by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: IamConservative
Does that graph mean to imply the Top Individual income tax rate in 1955 was 90%?

Nope! It doesn't imply it -- it plainly states that fact. It was 90% and the Dmocraps were even trying to raise that.

76 posted on 05/21/2008 6:45:15 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (You're wasting your timne with that one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson