1 posted on
05/16/2008 12:14:59 PM PDT by
jrooney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: jrooney
Oh YEAH?? how DARE he call me “FAT” ?!! I oughta...
...oh, wait.
Nevermind.
2 posted on
05/16/2008 12:17:57 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: jrooney
Well-played, Senator McCain.
Just convince me that the gobaloney warming nonsense is just campaign bamboozlement of frailminded “moderates”, and I might be willing to get back on board.
3 posted on
05/16/2008 12:18:53 PM PDT by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(QMC(SW) USN........ CG21 DD988 FFG34 PC6 ARS53)
To: jrooney
Mike Huckabee on Fox & Friends this morning was making the point that the Democrats should have pretended that Bush’s remarks didn’t have anything to do with them. He said that if you throw a rock over the fence, it’s the dog that gets hit that lets out a howl.
To: jrooney
McCain’s remark is blatantly racist...(or so we will hear on the evening news).
5 posted on
05/16/2008 12:22:30 PM PDT by
tips up
To: jrooney
LOL. Thats a priceless response.
6 posted on
05/16/2008 12:23:14 PM PDT by
contemplator
(Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
To: jrooney
All you Jewish democrats out there ought to be wary of electing a self-professed appeaser to the White House. Never forget what that meant to Jews across Europe when appeasers governed democracies. What will it mean to Jews in Israel today?
7 posted on
05/16/2008 12:23:33 PM PDT by
henkster
(Obama '08: A 3rd world state, here & now!)
To: jrooney
This guy is an absolute idiot, or an absolute quisling. My vote is on the latter.
There are 50 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan who differ with Obama...they are free to do so nowq because of Bush.
There has not been a major terror attack on our soil since 911, because of Bush and taking the fight to the enemy on their turf.
...and in the process, Iran, who is the chief sponsor of terror, is surrounded by our forces now, who are ready to attack should we need to.
Obama would have the world still living with Saddam Hussein, and an inabaility for us to respond to either him or Iran...and he calls that world safer.
I pray the American people will have the wisdom to see the difference.
BARACK HUSSEIN CHAMBERLAIN
8 posted on
05/16/2008 12:23:34 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: jrooney
“Appeaser?!!! Hey, he’s talking about ME! Hey, ME! OVER HERE, he’s talking about ME!!!”
9 posted on
05/16/2008 12:24:40 PM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: jrooney
The rats outsmarted again by the dumbest man to ever be a US president.
11 posted on
05/16/2008 12:26:02 PM PDT by
telebob
To: jrooney
The problem is that the average Joe voter cannot define appeasement much less care about who calls who one. This little quip is lost on most voters. Hussein needs to be attacked on his liberal domestic issues and lack of experience and character.
To: jrooney
I would like to hear
McCain say that.
Tucker had best watch it before John tosses him out...
16 posted on
05/16/2008 12:29:11 PM PDT by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: jrooney
...Obamas retort was a hysterical diatribe in response to a speech in which his name wasnt even mentioned. DOWN GOES OBAMA! DOWN GOES OBAMA!
17 posted on
05/16/2008 12:30:03 PM PDT by
McGruff
To: jrooney
Hey Barrack Hussein Obama: Shakespeare...”Me thinks thoust doth protest too much”! If the shoe fits, and it obviously does, wear it.
18 posted on
05/16/2008 12:30:24 PM PDT by
Road Warrior ‘04
(Kill 'em til they're dead, then kill 'em again!)
To: jrooney
This is SOOOOO GOOD for McCain after the global warming disaster.
To: jrooney
"McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds fired back that Obamas retort was a hysterical diatribe in response to a speech in which his name wasnt even mentioned."
LOL! This statement offers some hope that McCain will not be a doormat for the Demagogues despite his usual preference for civility -- this should be one of the main talking points of every R. over this issue of Obama and Bush's speech -- the Demagogues are in hysteria when President Bush did not even mention any of them. If anything the statement might have been directed most at Jimmy Carter, but since Obama is in effect running for "Jimmy Carter's 2nd Term" it's not surprising that Obama took such offense.
23 posted on
05/16/2008 12:32:43 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Obama: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
To: jrooney
Weeell, maybe our Bulldog does have some teeth.
To: jrooney
I'm sorry I'm just laughing my $ss off...PUNKED...this is too funny! McPycho better take this wonder gift and run with it!!
To: jrooney
Democrats: The Party of Sissies.
30 posted on
05/16/2008 12:46:12 PM PDT by
DGHoodini
("I never did believe you much, anyway...")
To: jrooney
35 posted on
05/16/2008 12:56:13 PM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
To: jrooney
Obama should stick to subjects he's clearly forthcoming on, like gay marriage, and stop being sooooooo sensitive on the possible inference that he was the appeaser Bush was warning against.
39 posted on
05/16/2008 12:58:32 PM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(If you liked Carter and you like Kennedy, you'll love Obama.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson