Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. House defeats $162.5 bln in new war funds (By a vote of 149-141....)
Reuters ^

Posted on 05/15/2008 12:54:22 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

U.S. House defeats $162.5 bln in new war funds Thu May 15, 2008 3:42pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday defeated legislation that would have funded the war in Iraq for another year, in a surprise move that the Senate could overturn.

By a vote of 149-141, the Democrat-controlled House rejected a measure that would have given the Pentagon $162.5 billion to keep the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan running through next summer, slightly below President George W. Bush's request.

A large group of anti-war House Democrats voted against the funds. That, coupled with 132 Republicans voting "present," meaning neither "yes" nor "no," killed the measure for now.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; defensespending; pelosi; reid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: SolidWood

Then why didn’t the spineless repubs vote “no”?


61 posted on 05/15/2008 2:01:03 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

As I wrote before: See post #43 and #46.


62 posted on 05/15/2008 2:02:29 PM PDT by SolidWood (Refusal to vote for McCain is active support for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Hold on! There are only 435 seats in the House. How do these numbers add up? 149 "nays" plus 141 "yeas" plus 132 "present" adds up to 422 -- but the "yeas" and "presents" yield 273 Republicans?

You assume that only Republicans voted for the bill.

63 posted on 05/15/2008 2:05:05 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

I am ashamed to say that I once considered myself to be a member of the Republican Party.

Every one of those spineless jellyfish can go straight to hell for all I care.


64 posted on 05/15/2008 2:08:00 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Average White Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

I believe there was an Illegal Immigrant amnesty rider attached. There’s an article here somewhere about an agricultural related amnesty plan.

These Republicans may have done us a favor. Hopefully a clean funidng bill will replace this deceitful travesty.


65 posted on 05/15/2008 2:08:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (If you continue to hold your nose and vote, and always win, your nation will be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I believe there was an Illegal Immigrant amnesty rider attached.

That's in the Senate's version I believe.

66 posted on 05/15/2008 2:12:52 PM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This only part of the treachery involved with the new Iraq funding bill.

Senate panel adds immigration measure (AGJobs Amensty) to Iraq supplemental

67 posted on 05/15/2008 2:15:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (If you continue to hold your nose and vote, and always win, your nation will be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

Thanks. It was proposed by Feinstein, so I should have surmised that on my own. I appreciate it.


68 posted on 05/15/2008 2:16:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (If you continue to hold your nose and vote, and always win, your nation will be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Please read the comments (especially #35, 37, 40, 43, 46).


69 posted on 05/15/2008 2:17:20 PM PDT by SolidWood (Refusal to vote for McCain is active support for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Oh sure Einstein that will work...sheesh do you not read?
That, coupled with 132 Republicans voting “present,” meaning neither “yes” nor “no,””

Well, I don’t recall ever claiming to be Einstein but I was speaking of Republicans generically, not the Republican Party or the Republicans currently in national office, and especially not those who were there and failed to do anything about it. Each Republican is going to have to carry their own conservative campaign without help from the GOP because the GOP has capitulated the high ground to the liberals. They need to trumpet Democratic failure to support the troops and war effort and they need to attack the do-nothings in office right now. It is the only way to win back conservative enthusiasm for Republican candidates.


70 posted on 05/15/2008 2:18:54 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

Not to mention the word “SENATE” in the title... ouch!


71 posted on 05/15/2008 2:20:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (If you continue to hold your nose and vote, and always win, your nation will be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

:-p


72 posted on 05/15/2008 2:21:46 PM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

:-p


73 posted on 05/15/2008 2:21:46 PM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Fox_Mulder77

Heh heh heh... take care bud.


74 posted on 05/15/2008 2:24:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (If you continue to hold your nose and vote, and always win, your nation will be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

I caught that after I posted.

Thanks for the heads-up though.


75 posted on 05/15/2008 2:25:43 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Average White Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: navyguy

Because they are pathetic losers. That is why. Republicans are on their way out, if for no other reason than they are spineless weenies.


76 posted on 05/15/2008 2:26:10 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
That, coupled with 132 Republicans voting "present," meaning neither "yes" nor "no," killed the measure for now

It just makes tossing the RNC mailers into the trash that much more fun.

77 posted on 05/15/2008 2:26:27 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Ted Kennedy - Codename -> "Bobber")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
That, coupled with 132 Republicans voting "present," meaning neither "yes" nor "no," killed the measure for now

It just makes tossing the RNC mailers into the trash that much more fun.

78 posted on 05/15/2008 2:26:36 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Ted Kennedy - Codename -> "Bobber")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How’d you like to be deployed in Iraq and read about this cr—!


79 posted on 05/15/2008 2:27:03 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

They passed that farm bill folks, GOPukes helped them in a veto proof end. Hang on to your wallet and start a program of tar and feathers for these traitors.

They need to be ejected from Congress ASAP!


80 posted on 05/15/2008 2:29:28 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson