I believe LAT national presidential polling are always inaccurate because they do not weigh their polls properly.
1 posted on
05/10/2008 12:54:35 PM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
Well, thats it.
Lets all go home. - The LA times has decided the election...
2 posted on
05/10/2008 12:56:11 PM PDT by
bill1952
(I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
To: Red Steel
Hitler beats McCain in an LA Times Poll!
To: Red Steel
Who in the hell believes a Los Angeles Times poll? NOT me:-)
4 posted on
05/10/2008 12:57:27 PM PDT by
geo40xyz
(McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
To: Red Steel
5 posted on
05/10/2008 12:57:40 PM PDT by
golfisnr1
(Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
To: Red Steel
Alas, I am beginning to think Obama would beat McCain in a poll sponsored by FR.
7 posted on
05/10/2008 1:00:11 PM PDT by
mware
(mware...killer of threads.)
To: Red Steel
What is the “Los Angeles Times”? Is it a “newspaper” or something?
To: Red Steel
2,208 adults nationwide -- 1,986 of them registered voters Leaving 222 folks who don't care enough to register to vote.
10 posted on
05/10/2008 1:02:38 PM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Red Steel
Jeez.
10% of the people polled in this dog aren't even voters.
This is a poll of adults. Polls of adults always favor the 'Rats. They didn't even need to take this poll to get this result.
C'mon.
11 posted on
05/10/2008 1:03:15 PM PDT by
FredZarguna
("I want that crazy uncle institutionalized, pronto.")
To: Red Steel
National adults? Not even like voters or even registered voters.
They could not have chosen a worse demographic within which to poll. They did it because it is the cheapest way to poll. No worries about are respondents registered and if they are have they voted in past elections and are they planning to vote this time. Nope, all they need to ask is “are you over 18 years of age”.
Worthless poll from an organization that is known for worthless polls. It was this rag that had Busemonte (sp) beating Schwarzenegger by 10 points the day before the election.
12 posted on
05/10/2008 1:06:42 PM PDT by
lexusppd
To: Red Steel
Oops, didn’t see the demographic breakdown that said 1900 or so were registered voters. Sorry, my bad.
14 posted on
05/10/2008 1:07:55 PM PDT by
lexusppd
To: Red Steel
It’s a poll of adults and registered voters. Add a few points to McCain. But he’s still not winning. Rasmussen, the best pollster out there, has both Obama (up by 3) and Hillary (up by 5) beating McCain. Since we’re still deep in the throes of Operation Chaos, that doesn’t bode well for McCain.
16 posted on
05/10/2008 1:11:41 PM PDT by
LadyNavyVet
("No more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition ..." Ronald Reagan)
To: Red Steel
Two words: Electoral College.
17 posted on
05/10/2008 1:12:07 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
To: Red Steel
The headline should have read, "The Witch and the Devil beat John McCain in
Los Angeles Times poll."
In these demonic times, this is the Season of the Witch.
To: Red Steel
Be the same as playboy having a poll,”do you find naked ladies breasts a good thing”?
The pool seems slanted to begin with.
20 posted on
05/10/2008 1:20:34 PM PDT by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: Red Steel
The LA Times is still in business? And all this time I thought Variety was the paper of record for Los Angeles.
To: Red Steel
If I had a dime for every poll that’s been used to create news, I’d be . . . a rich white woman. An older rich white woman.
Barack don’t say “White Woman,” he say “White Folk.” I am not a Folk. I’m not all ‘white’ either. Lots of tan, some red. Never saw a white person unless he was wearing a robe with a pointy hat. Is that what ol’ Barack is referrin’ to when he says “White Folk?”
You think? I think! (Therefore I am a Conservative.)
27 posted on
05/10/2008 3:17:17 PM PDT by
HighlyOpinionated
(http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com -- read, learn, blog, or get out of my way.)
To: Red Steel
I haven’t trusted a thing Pravda on the Pacific has stated in the last thirty years.
29 posted on
05/10/2008 3:18:42 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Who opposes John McCain's leftist agenda? The RNC, Rep Congress members, the Democrats? Good luck!)
To: Red Steel
The LAT is also just as strong an arm of the Democrat party as the NYT.
What other story can you expect from this liberal paper with a circulation of 99 thousand.
34 posted on
05/10/2008 11:45:43 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson