Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 small-town jr. high kids suspended for sitting during Pledge (of Allegiance)
Minneapolis StarTribune (aka The Red Star) ^ | 5/09/08 | Paul Walsh - Staff Reporter

Posted on 05/09/2008 9:11:15 AM PDT by MplsSteve

Three small-town eighth-graders were suspended for not standing at the start of the school day Thursday for the Pledge of Allegiance.

"My son wasn't being defiant against America," said Kim Dahl, mother of one of the students, Brandt, who attends Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton Junior High School in western Minnesota.

Brandt told the Fargo Forum that Thursday's one-day in-school suspension, "was kind of dumb because I didn't do anything wrong. It should be the people's choice."

Kim Dahl said the "punishment didn't fit the crime. If they wanted to know why he didn't stand, they should've made him write a paper."

She said that Brandt has not been standing all year, and "all of a sudden it became an in-school suspension."

The district today is defending the punishments. The school's handbook says all students are required to stand but are not obligated to recite the pledge.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; culturewar; dumbkids; indoctrination; minnesota; pledge; pledgeofallegiance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: purpleraine

“No disrespect tolerated here.
This says all you need to know about freedom and how much others will tolerate when it offends them. Pathetic.”

I don’t understand your post. Can you expand on your thought please so I don’t misunderstand?


61 posted on 05/09/2008 8:58:15 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Not saluting the flag can be an expression of political speech. It is protected by the constitution. Now some people don't think that applies to kids and some do.

When some teacher or principal makes that proclamation against kids who don't stand, they are merely showing that power is more important that rights.

You don't teach the exercise of rights by restricting them. This is a chance for the school to teach why you might stand and why those who don't have a right to sit. They might teach that wars have been fought for those rights. But they usually cowboy up and look for ways to exercise power.

62 posted on 05/09/2008 10:43:38 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine

The school handbook, approved by the Board of Education, states the children must stand for the Pledge but they don’t have to recite it.

That strikes a good balance between understanding respect and for the ability to show dissent without disruption.

For the Arlington incident I cited earlier, when you are at a place that honors those who have given their lives to protect us, our freedoms, and our way of life, respect is to be shown, and disrespect should not be tolerated. That transcends rights and involves common decency and honoring the sacrifice made by others on our behalf.

If a person cannot be civil in a hallowed place, they need to be elsewhere.


63 posted on 05/09/2008 10:55:28 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
"It’s hip to piss on America now."

Sad but true.

64 posted on 05/09/2008 11:01:30 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: exit82
The whole purpose of the right is to "disrespect" if you chose to. This type of "disrespect" is not disruptive and does not create a safety problem. The only disruption comes is when the school officials decide to force people to stand.

The power and authority of government does not transcend rights. That's why they're rights.

The school handbook is just a further example of that abuse of power. "We want you to look like you're doing something you chose not to do. We don't want anybody to know you're exercising your rights."

65 posted on 05/10/2008 6:09:44 AM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

What did you expect it’s Minnesooooooota.


66 posted on 05/10/2008 6:39:02 AM PDT by Rappini (Remember Joe Foss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

The principal has had a change of heart.

My guess is that he would very much not like to be sued.

See: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354864,00.html


67 posted on 05/10/2008 4:06:18 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson