Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: purpleraine

The school handbook, approved by the Board of Education, states the children must stand for the Pledge but they don’t have to recite it.

That strikes a good balance between understanding respect and for the ability to show dissent without disruption.

For the Arlington incident I cited earlier, when you are at a place that honors those who have given their lives to protect us, our freedoms, and our way of life, respect is to be shown, and disrespect should not be tolerated. That transcends rights and involves common decency and honoring the sacrifice made by others on our behalf.

If a person cannot be civil in a hallowed place, they need to be elsewhere.


63 posted on 05/09/2008 10:55:28 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: exit82
The whole purpose of the right is to "disrespect" if you chose to. This type of "disrespect" is not disruptive and does not create a safety problem. The only disruption comes is when the school officials decide to force people to stand.

The power and authority of government does not transcend rights. That's why they're rights.

The school handbook is just a further example of that abuse of power. "We want you to look like you're doing something you chose not to do. We don't want anybody to know you're exercising your rights."

65 posted on 05/10/2008 6:09:44 AM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson