Posted on 05/08/2008 9:26:55 AM PDT by neverdem
NJ has a de facto ban.
So does Maryland!
BUM(P)ing
There are several states where issuance is at the discretion of the chiefs of police and the like. In all of those states, the people with money, power, and political connections are granted permission to carry a firearm. The peasants need not even ask.
Actually, you CAN carry a pistol in Illinois as long as it is in a separate container (like a zippered pouch). There is a “loophole”, if you will, in the law that allows this. I don’t have a link for it but maybe someone less-lazy than me can provide it.
As it now stands, Chicago can basically pass any law it wants, regardless of State Law. And to some respects Cook County too. Maybe this is what Doug Aurand in Winnebago is looking at.
In any case it sure will be interesting. 'King' Daley and 'my' ijit gov, Blago, will go apoplectic. Daley because he thinks he runs all of IL, and gov Blago because, well, he's an ijit.
Chances are, I’m going to have to move to Wisconsin soon. Crap. Apparently they tried to prosecute a store owner who kept a loaded firearm on his person in the store. The state supreme court had to state that it was ok for a store or home owner to keep a loaded weapon on themselves to defend their store or home... pretty sad when they have to actually spell out the right to defend yourself on your own property. Guess I’ll be joining one of the local gun groups to push for changes.
My understanding of Wisconsin law, as it pertains to the powers of counties (and I have personal work experience therewith, albeit a score of years ago), is that counties, being sub-divisions of the state, do not have “home rule,” meaning they they perform only such governmental functions as are expressly permitted by state law. Cities and villages, on the other hand, having the powers of home rule, may do whatever is not expressly proscribed by state law, provided it is constitutional.
As much as I admire what Winnebago county is contemplating enacting, I doubt they have the requisite statutory authority.
That 'loophole' wasn't a really 'loophole' and anyway, no longer exists. It was 'closed' a few years ago.
It did pertain to a gun in a zippered pouch (fanny pack) with the magazine in a separate partition of the pouch. But the Cook County States Attorney, notorious gun grabber DICK DeVine, warned all that no one better try it as he'd prosecute anyone to the fullest extent of the law (more so than a gang banger). Then the IL General Assembly closed the 'loophole' with more exact language as to how a gun can legally be transported and Fanny Packs are now a specific no-no.
btw, The org that was pushing this 'carry loophole' was Concealed Carry, Inc. and is now out of business due to legal fees (he had a good idea but was fighting a losing battle).
Where’s Winnebago County, WI or IL?
My understanding is...it has to be in a carry case of some kind, with the ammo in a different location...and must be in an area of the auto that cannot be accessed without first having to exit the auto. (like the trunk). Not sure what the rule is if it’s in a van or a pickup truck regarding that requirement.
Let's be honest. It wouldn't have necessarily taken a "qualified" person to stop this. Hell, the shooter didn't have any training and was able to kill 32.
Central Eastern Wisconsin
OK, correction. While there is one in WI this is apparently the one in IL.
A woman was prosecuted for carrying an unloaded handgun in her purse into a Courthouse somewhere downstate. The ILSC said that a purse qualified as a case and the woman was declared 'not guilty'.
The DuPage County Prosecutor publicly announced he would no longer prosecute any 'fanny pack' cases in his jursidiction.
L
Here we go again. Are they really expecting suicidal, gun-shooting maniacs to comply with such laws?
On the other hand, even the maniacs would likely hesitate before they used concealed weapons if they knew that people might be carrying concealed weapons.
Thanks to constitutional flunky state lawmakers and the people who elected them to office, Illinois and Wisconsin are in contempt of both the 2nd and 14th Amendments.
Illinois and Wisconsin wrongly ignore that John Bingham and the 39th Congress clarified that the 2nd A. is a personal right which the 14th A. applied to the states. See the 2nd A. in the middle column of the following page from the Congressional Globe, a precursor to the Congressional Record.
http://tinyurl.com/y3ne4nThe page referenced above is one of Bingham's discussions of the 14th A., Bingham being the main author of Sec. 1 of that amendment.
IL.
North. On Wis border. Rockford, IL is in Winnebago Cty.
And in Rockford, you need concealed carry. It has 'changed'.
And this is a shocker.:
The DuPage County Prosecutor publicly announced he would no longer prosecute any 'fanny pack' cases in his jursidiction.Wow! Joe Birkett has IMO been portrayed as a gun grabber. Not as bad as DICK DeVine (sic) in Cook, but not exactly 'gun friendly' (I still voted for him).
But if that's true I may start wearing a Fanny Pack 'holster' with my Makarov :-)
[my 9mm is too large, its a Star, Model B (C&R)]
Ironically, in Wisconsin it's "concealed carry" that's illegal. You can "open carry" legally, although you might find youself in trouble anyway if some jerk cop thought you were brandishing in some way...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.