EXPELLED! NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED.

WingClips ^

[LJayne]

There is a movement on the horizon that has the potential to change the educational system in America and influence your kids, you and the youth you serve. For decades now, Neo-Darwinism has maintained a stranglehold within public education, suppressing all other theories on the origins of life—especially those that hint of a "designer".

[Sun]

I read your post the last time, and disagreed then, and disagree now.

There are two sides, but the liberals have control of the government schools, so only one side is taught.

Evolution is NOT evident; it is junk science.

What a waste of time to teach it in the government schools.

Science has done so much to make our lives better. What good does teaching evolution do. Why not spend more time curing diseases, etc..

[Coyoteman]

Another wonder. Here's a Darwinist, whose flawed theory came into existence about 150 years ago, who calls ID which has been around for centuries, "new and strange." Your history as well as your science is greatly flawed.

ID didn't lie and claim to be a science until creation "science" was removed from the classrooms after the Edwards decision.

Google "cdesign proponentsists" and tell me anyone really thinks ID is science.

Out for the night. I have better things to do. (Saturday is the day I dust my dental floss collection.)

[Sun]

“The truth and the existence of God. It would mean a radical change in their life and world view. This is not a bad thing although their fear is that this is a terrible thing.”

Maybe the fear is that we are shaking their “faith.”

[Jim W N]

Neither your somewhat rambling answers nor the Edwards decision has provided a cogent rebuttal to ID. It's OK, I'll be patient

Good luck with the dental floss.

[Sun]

Intelligent Design Science: http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_idtheory.htm

AND

http://acs.ucsd.edu/~idea/irredcomplex.htm

[Tramonto]

It can't be refuted because it is religious belief, not science. It does not rely on evidence, so it can't be refuted by evidence.

There you go again, ID can't be refuted but its already been refuted.

Your statement is a LIE and you know it. Since you are so interested in ID, why don't you actually learn something about it instead of posting your straw man arguments.

[Tramonto]

Another piece of evidence that ID is possible is that scientists have been able to intelligently design proteins that perform specific functions. There are many examples of plants that are in a small part designed by humans to resist cold weather, drought, produce more food etc. Macro evolution on the other hand, just takes too long to observe in one life time so we don’t have any concrete examples like we do for ID.

[TPartyType]

Yes, a clever trick, indeed. I took it as a sign of artificial intelligence.

[bmwcyle]

Fast mutation. This does not mean something evolves. It just changes.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

I spent six years in grad school, half of which was dedicated to the study of evolution,

So, you have half a degree in evolution?

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

But the lie is still spread in hope of fooling folks who don't know any better.

But you have said many times that truth doesn't belong in science, so why complain about this?

[hepatoma]

No. You’re talking about something completely different...or you’re not explaining correctly.

Endogenous retroviruses. Not talking about drug-resistant HIV.

[hepatoma]

“Another piece of evidence that ID is possible is that scientists have been able to intelligently design proteins that perform specific functions.”

That’s evidence that intelligent design is possible, not Intelligent Design.

“Macro evolution on the other hand, just takes too long to observe in one life time so we don’t have any concrete examples like we do for ID.”

Please provide evidence for ID. Actual evidence.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

What a waste of time to teach it in the government schools.

Yes indeed. Can you imagine a bigger waste of Billy's time than forcing him to regurgitate Malthusian dog-eat-dog nonsense, imaginary phylogeny trees, and speculations about monkeys accidentally transforming into chessmasters? Have a look at my FR page and download some of the books, like Hunter's Civic Biology and The ABC of Evolution. What rubbish.

[BufordP]

Go he her out

But, what does it mean . . .?

Just looks to me like a monkey banging on a keyboard. But what were you expecting? Shakespeare?

[Sun]

WOW!! You have a very impressive FR page, and what’s up with all of those Darwins and eugenics?

For example, from your page:

“Francis Darwin Darwin Medalist 1912. Cambridge Eugenics Society member.”

[Sun]

Here’s the trailer for the movie, EXPELLED, No Intelligence Necessary:

http://www.expelledthemovie.com/playground.php

How did life begin in the first place?

And the trailer shows the scientists who were “expelled” for being independent thinkers.

[floriduh voter]

We have a darwinist among us? Arent they for natural selection and only the strong survive if they get their wishes???

[TPartyType]

Good link! Some Freeper has too much time on his hand! HA!

[Jim W N]

Have you noticed how unassailable intelligent design is? The best those in opposition can do is either launch a personal attack or agree I.D. is irrefutable. Its stand-alone self-evidence is plain for all to see. With a correct understanding, one may use it as the best refutation to evolutionism.

Romans 1:19-20: Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: