PURE EVIL. There was no reason to take her baby away.
Except of course, to protect the child - if one cares about such things.
Get a grip.
They didn’t separate her from her children. They are ALL in state custody together.
I am hoping the above just means the state has jurisdiction now. It is possible the mother and child were placed together in a foster home. At least I hope so.
LEL: “PURE EVIL”
I couldn’t agree more. How is the newborn harmed by allowing it to stay with its mother? If actual abuse is proven in a court of law, that is one thing. To rip a newborn from its mother simply because the girl is a member of a religious cult we may or may not agree with is, as you say, pure evil.
Whatever happened to land of the free, even for people we may or may not agree with? Hundreds of thousands if not millions of underage girls are having sex and many are having babies. Shall we seize all children born to underage mothers, since apparently the mere fact they are giving birth is enough to prove a crime (statutory rape) and abuse occurred? I hope not.
Wrong!
In this cult, she would have had her baby taken away at some point, and passed to another woman -or two or so...
Agreed.
Only it is IMPURE EVIL...
Fascist Satanic Statism at its worst !!
“First they came for the strange religious cults....” Ya’ll know the rest..
Speak up now, while we are still able!
Have they taken the baby away from her physically? Or is is just the baby is under the jurisdiction of the state legally? Because reports have stated that the mothers believed to be under 18 have been placed in foster care *along with their children*. So they and the children are in state custody, but they’re with their children.
Who did they take it away from? The state is keeping all minor mothers with their children. In this case, they know for sure who the mother is, so the baby is with its mother. Why do you have a problem with that? The mother is clearly in no position to support or house either of her children, and the father — who may or may not ever surface and make a custody claim — in nowhere to be found, so the state needs to take legal custody, but there is no indication that they have taken the baby away from the mother, or have any plans to.
I didn’t see that they actually took the baby away (but maybe they did, do you have more info?). I would have to imagine the baby was placed in state custody because at this point, the girl is in state custody. What other option did they have?
susie