LEL: “PURE EVIL”
I couldn’t agree more. How is the newborn harmed by allowing it to stay with its mother? If actual abuse is proven in a court of law, that is one thing. To rip a newborn from its mother simply because the girl is a member of a religious cult we may or may not agree with is, as you say, pure evil.
Whatever happened to land of the free, even for people we may or may not agree with? Hundreds of thousands if not millions of underage girls are having sex and many are having babies. Shall we seize all children born to underage mothers, since apparently the mere fact they are giving birth is enough to prove a crime (statutory rape) and abuse occurred? I hope not.
That has been my argument for the last few weeks. I even got banned from Free Republic (after being a member for 10 years) for standing up for American families.
This is wrong!
It’s folks like you who make this a whole lot worse than the reality. Here’s why: since the girl is in State custody, if the state does not take custody of the newborn the newborn will not be with his mother. Get it? The mother is in custody because there is reasonable cause to beleive she was unlawfully impregnated, not once but TWICE! Sheesh.
I've been wondering how far they really plan to go with this. It is troubling to me. The other issue is the idea that children can be taken due to belief in future abuse that will be a tricky thing legally.
One thing is for sure, this mess will keep many lawyers, and the courts tied up for years. I have already noticed many legal "experts" in the media saying everything the authorities did was legal and by the book, and just as many claiming everything was done wrong. Should be interesting to see how they sort it all out.