Skip to comments.
FBI busts "special interest" illegals
KRQE TV ^
| May 1, 2008
| Todd Dukart
Posted on 05/01/2008 3:20:13 PM PDT by AuntB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Vigilanteman
But he is tough on terror, they say. The only ones I know that he is tough on are Conservatives.
I am not going to vote for him.
21
posted on
05/02/2008 4:46:57 AM PDT
by
sport
To: FORTRUTHONLY
Exactly. All illegal aliens have committed a crime. Yet Hillary, along with Obama and McCain, voted against the Cornyn amendment which would have barred terrorists and gang members from this country.
22
posted on
05/02/2008 5:34:11 AM PDT
by
Dante3
To: sport
I'd like to see McCain do something, anything such as naming a solid conservative VP or sincerely apologizing for his role in amnesty or McCain-Feingold which would make me want to vote for him.
But if the election were held today, I couldn't even vote for him while holding my nose. They don't make poles long enough either.
23
posted on
05/02/2008 6:19:47 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
To: BIGLOOK
That's a given. And add identity theft or falsification of official documents, mail fraud, several violations of the RICCO Act, tax fraud and one that a New Hampshire deputy sheriff charged....Trespassing. You logic is correct but never use the subjunctive mood in a conclusion. Welcome aboard, FORTRUTHONLY.
I was not aware that FR forum came with free grammar lessons. I am not as worried about my spelling/grammar abilities since English IS my second language and I fluently speak a total of 6 others but alas, thanks for the welcoming wagon :)
To: Dante3
Exactly. All illegal aliens have committed a crime. Yet Hillary, along with Obama and McCain, voted against the Cornyn amendment which would have barred terrorists and gang members from this country.
Once again we're proven the slim pickings for this year's elections.
To: FORTRUTHONLY
That's not a grammar lesson, it's a lesson in sentential logic. Logical conclusions never contain 'should', 'could', 'would'; it would make them assumptions rather than conclusions.
Don't take offense by this, your argument was sound but using subjunctive mood in the conclusion weakened it.
Therefore, I am glad to meet you.
26
posted on
05/03/2008 12:39:34 PM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(MSM-Keelhauling the News Daily!)
To: BIGLOOK; FORTRUTHONLY
The word “trespassing”, as used by the poster, is not a subjunctive. Trespassing can also be a noun, meaning transgression, and it was correctly used.
Welcome aboard, FORTRUTHONLY. Your logic, grammar (and manners) are impeccable.
27
posted on
05/03/2008 12:54:50 PM PDT
by
Eroteme
To: BIGLOOK
Ok, just re-read the posts and saw that you were not referring to the word trespassing; that was your word. Sorry.
I think we all should be glad to have another clear-thinking FR member whose posts add to substantive content
28
posted on
05/03/2008 12:59:33 PM PDT
by
Eroteme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson