Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BIGLOOK
That's a given. And add identity theft or falsification of official documents, mail fraud, several violations of the RICCO Act, tax fraud and one that a New Hampshire deputy sheriff charged....Trespassing. You logic is correct but never use the subjunctive mood in a conclusion. Welcome aboard, FORTRUTHONLY.

I was not aware that FR forum came with free grammar lessons. I am not as worried about my spelling/grammar abilities since English IS my second language and I fluently speak a total of 6 others but alas, thanks for the welcoming wagon :)
24 posted on 05/03/2008 6:36:02 AM PDT by FORTRUTHONLY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: FORTRUTHONLY
That's not a grammar lesson, it's a lesson in sentential logic. Logical conclusions never contain 'should', 'could', 'would'; it would make them assumptions rather than conclusions.

Don't take offense by this, your argument was sound but using subjunctive mood in the conclusion weakened it.

Therefore, I am glad to meet you.
26 posted on 05/03/2008 12:39:34 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (MSM-Keelhauling the News Daily!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson