Posted on 04/23/2008 1:23:56 PM PDT by blam
Scientists say pyramids could be concrete
April 23, 2008
Scientists are taking a new look at Egypt's pyramids to see if some of the blocks could have been made from concrete.
Linn W. Hobbs, a materials science professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told The Boston Globe there is a chance ancient Egyptians could have cast the blocks from synthetic material instead of carving them from quarries. Scientists have long believed Romans were the first to use structural concrete.
Undergraduates in MIT's Materials in Human Experience class are building a scale-model pyramid made of quarried limestone and blocks cast from crushed limestone sludge fortified with clay, silica and natural desert salts.
Archaeologists say there is no evidence the pyramids are built of any synthetic material, the newspaper said. Hobbs said the concrete theory, advanced in the 1980s by French chemical engineer Joseph Davidovits, is fascinating because it would mean the ancient Egyptians were great materials scientists as well as great civil engineers.
I have seen this speculation before on FR, a few years ago. It would be a much easier explanation than hauling those humongous blocks in those humongous numbers from far away then raising them into place. If it finally turns out to be correct.
http://www.aeraweb.org/khufu_quarry.asp
http://www.theglobaleducationproject.org/egypt/studyguide/6stone.php
According to Barrack Hussein Obama’s pastor, they were cut with high speed diamond wet saws then lapped to a mirror finish, transported to the job site where stationary and mobile cranes hoisted them into place.
It was during this era that humans and cartoon characters diverged from their common ancestors. Humans retained their vestigial fifth fingers.
ping
Are you sure, absolutely sure, that Al Gore didn’t create the third dimension shortly before he invented the internet and global warming/cooling/whatever?
The basic pyramid blocks had to have been poured; way too much work and you’d waste more than half the available stone material otherwise.
Ok, cut and moved OR cast in place they STILL had to move
a billion TONS of mass into position.
At the rate of 400 blocks or 800 tons or more a day of limestone aggregate and assorted water and chemicals still pretty incredible.
I don’t think we have the answer yet.
Sorry not a billion tons but ten million tons or so.
Still amazing.
|
|||
Gods |
Note: this topic is from April 2008. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.