Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's working!


1 posted on 04/22/2008 8:10:55 AM PDT by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: seanmerc

I thought of registering Dem when Hillary was running for the Senate....But didn’t want to hang my head in disgrace in my hometown.


2 posted on 04/22/2008 8:21:48 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
It's amazes me that some just don't understand the simple principles of Operation Chaos.

Come on people. This is not rocket science.

4 posted on 04/22/2008 8:35:19 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Ha! Move-on was a front for Slick Willie, but they’ve moved on to Obama. Sorry Hillary!


5 posted on 04/22/2008 8:45:23 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

Fellow travellers will throw anyone under the bus. Stalinist playbook in play.


7 posted on 04/22/2008 8:47:51 AM PDT by weegee (Vote Obama 2008 for a bitter America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Hillary said:
We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn't even want us to go into Afghanistan. I mean, that's what we're dealing with. ... They know I don't agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me.

11 posted on 04/22/2008 8:58:32 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc

So basically what Rush is saying is that between Hillary and Obama as President, he’d take Hillary.

This will end up giving her the Presidency, even though it limits Obama to VP only.


12 posted on 04/22/2008 9:03:46 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: seanmerc
My problem with this is that it makes Conservatives/Republicans directly involved with 'Rat political decisions. I hate it as an idea and I hate what it might mean.

"Be careful what you wish for ..."

If Hillary gets the nominee - and WINS - it will just give Republicans something else to fight about amongst ourselves. "It's your fault!! You went with Operation Chaos!! You voted for Hillary and look what happened!"

With Mormons fighting "true" Christians, pro-lifers fighting pro-choicers, ED's fighting evos, Libertarians fighting Republicans ... don't we have enough to fight about?

Leave the 'Rats alone. Let them duke it out. I just want to watch a good fight. I don't want to be part of it.

15 posted on 04/22/2008 9:36:17 AM PDT by LiberConservative ("Typical" White Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson