We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn't even want us to go into Afghanistan. I mean, that's what we're dealing with. ... They know I don't agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me.
At this point, I think this may be a mistake.
A Hillary nomination is more centrist and appeals to more independents than an Obama nomination. She is much more dangerous as a winner with a Democrat Congress.
An Obama nomination leaves her out in the cold where she will NOT tolerate being. She will work to get him beaten so she can try again in 2012. A force of McCain, independents and the Clintons can likely beat Obama.
The reverse is not true. Obama would not work to defeat her because he has far more time to try again.
She is going to win Pennsylvania and continue, but Indiana and North Carolina would be good places to stop her. She can rest firmly assured of the nomination in 2012 if Obama is beaten by McCain.
Hey Hillary, better put some ice on that!
Moveon.org hasn’t been about moving on for years. When I look at what they say about President Bush, I know many of their members are stuck in 2004, or even 2000. And I can’t remember the last time they had a new idea. Is it illegal for a political organization to change its name?