Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Lean Times, Biotech Grains Are Less Taboo (Frankenfoods)
New York Times ^

Posted on 04/21/2008 12:33:30 PM PDT by anymouse

Soaring food prices and global grain shortages are bringing new pressures on governments, food companies and consumers to relax their longstanding resistance to genetically engineered crops.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Technical
KEYWORDS: agriculture; food; geneticallymodified; science
The leftist dilemma.
1 posted on 04/21/2008 12:33:30 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Genetically engineered foods are are wholesome and safe as conventionally grown foods. There is no taste difference. Its a shame its taken soaring food prices to lead the Left to drop its resistance to sensible progress in agriculture.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 04/21/2008 12:36:26 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Frankenfood = Frankencelery


3 posted on 04/21/2008 12:41:43 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am very mad at Disney. Give me my James Marsden song!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
I've never understood the hysteria over genetically altered food. Every food crop is genetically altered by centuries of selective breeding and selection, and transplanting, and grafting, and crossbreeding, and ..........
4 posted on 04/21/2008 12:48:10 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby
That's also true about conventional foods. Genetically modified foods just happen to be engineered to resist diseases and pests and produce superior tasting crops. I have never understood what environmentalists have against biotechnology that would eliminate crop loss, pesticide use and more nutritious foods. Surely, those are things are in everyone's interest. Agriculture is a human pursuit and there has never been anything natural about it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 04/21/2008 12:56:41 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

but if you are willing to pay $6 for a gallon of orange juice at whole foods, this should not strike you with concern.


6 posted on 04/21/2008 1:02:18 PM PDT by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

The EU’s refusla to allow GM foods in the EU has cost Africa a great deal. I would expect this to break down now that we have a supply problem.


7 posted on 04/21/2008 2:15:10 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Bingo!


8 posted on 04/21/2008 2:21:02 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

BTTT


9 posted on 04/21/2008 8:21:31 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I have to credit my sister’s bringing me to an anti-biotech protest rally in Boston as my first step on the road to Conservatism. I wanted to be 180° from those freaks!


10 posted on 04/21/2008 8:46:26 PM PDT by To Hell With Poverty (Obama hates you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

Dijonaise for your DNA.


11 posted on 04/21/2008 11:17:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby

Bingo. You’re spot-on.

The difference in “GMO” plants is that the breeding has been accelerated.

Most people don’t know that corn (which we hear quite a bit about here on FR WRT ethanol production) is a grass. Most all grains are, in fact, selectively bred grasses.

The Indians of the Great Basin (Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Utah) used to depend on the seeds of grasses such as Indian Ricegrass to support themselves. If most people saw Indian Ricegrass, they’d agree that this was “pretty thin pickin’s” and they’d be worrying about many other things in life other than losing weight.

Wheat, as we currently know it, is shorter and produces more grain than it used to 100 years ago. The selective breeding programs over the last 100+ years have increased the yields and reduced the losses due to lodging.

So if someone comes along and genetically modifies wheat to resist blight or insects, this is a bad thing because... why?

Oh, right, because the genetic modification was researched and developed by some large US-based corporation. Riiiight. Got it now.


12 posted on 04/22/2008 12:07:17 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby; anymouse; NVDave
The key difference between traditional genetic manipulation and GMO is that with the traditional method, plants or animals that have desirable characteristics are cross-bred to achieve an even higher level of that characteristic. With GMO foods, the desirable genes are inserted directly into the seed or embryo.

This does at least raise some chance for unexpected (dangerous) results, but for some reason it just doesn't concern me. If the scientists are able to determine which genes are the desirable ones, they can surely also determine which ones are the bad ones, and omit, over ride or remove them. Besides, it's not like this hasn't been done for that last 20 years with no discernible negative side effects.

13 posted on 04/22/2008 5:18:45 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (A Zero Tolerance Policy isnÂ’t a one way street.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Let the people choose what they want, get governments out of it. I think genetically engineered food is great! :)


14 posted on 04/22/2008 7:40:54 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby
I've never understood the hysteria over genetically altered food.

The hysteria is mostly from people who don't have to worry about going to bed hungry. My general observation

* People who agitate against sources of cheap food can generally afford vast quantities of the most expensive gourmet food.

* People who agitate against energy consumption can generally afford to live in the largest, most luxurious houses, and travel around the world.

* People who agitate for reducing the human footprint in pristine wildenesses generally travel to those wildernesses regularly.

* People who agitate against growth in the developing world either live in the developed world or at at the top of the pyramid in the developing world.

15 posted on 04/22/2008 7:52:53 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson