Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bandurria Is Oldest Peruvian Archaeological Site, Say Expert
Andina ^ | 4-16-2008 | Alejandro Chu

Posted on 04/20/2008 7:28:12 PM PDT by blam

Bandurria is the oldest Peruvian archaeological site, says expert

Archaeological site of Bandurria located in Huaura, Lima

Lima, Apr. 16 (ANDINA).- The archaelogical site of Bandurria dating back 3200 BC (located in the province of Huaura, Lima) is considered the origin of ancient American civilization, said archaeologist Alejandro Chu Barrera, director of the Archaeological Project of Bandurria. “Several radiocarbon datings done in the United states confirmed that Bandurria dates back from 3200 B.C., while Caral dates from 2900”, said the archaeologist.

The expert mentioned that the main reason for the development of highly organized cultures along the Peruvian coast is explained in the availavility of marine resources which allowed to improve the population’s diet of the place.

Bandurria is located 140 kilometres from Lima and received this peculiar name because of a bird which inhabit this area. It was discovered by late 1973 but first excavations took place in 1977. It wasn't until July 2005 that the site begun to be excavated by a team of archeologists and students from San Marcos National University, led by archeologist Alejandro Chu.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bandurria; godsgravesglyphs; oldest; peru; site

1 posted on 04/20/2008 7:28:13 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
GGG Ping

"Bandurria dates back from 3200 B.C., while Caral dates from 2900”,

This is going to upset Ruth Shady, terribly.

2 posted on 04/20/2008 7:30:47 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Is that the real Ruth Shady?


3 posted on 04/20/2008 9:02:55 PM PDT by billorites (Freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is going to upset Ruth Shady, terribly.

Well! Haas and Creamer aren't too happy about it, either.

4 posted on 04/21/2008 2:34:12 AM PDT by woofer (Earth First! We'll mine the other eight later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woofer
"Well! Haas and Creamer aren't too happy about it, either."

I think Haas and Creamer theorized that the people originally settled on the coast and then gradually migrated inland over time. Shady's theory is exactly the opposite, if I recall correctly. H&C parted company with Shady and began work on sites nearer the coast. So...

5 posted on 04/21/2008 6:52:20 AM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
:'D Thanks Blam. You really speak to the young. ;')

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


6 posted on 04/21/2008 7:12:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; blam
SITIO WEB OFICIAL DE LA PIRÁMIDE DE BANDURRIA. Buff-necked ibis - Bandurria
7 posted on 04/22/2008 2:50:46 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (a fair dinkum aussie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Nice pics! Interesting site, not least because of the age.


8 posted on 04/22/2008 8:10:47 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Is RC Dating really that exact that it can pinpoint within 300 years? I was reading some stuff the other night about RC Dating of bones and such of aboriginies and they were talking about a leeway of up to 6,000 years plus or minus. Granted, in the case I was reading we’re talking about estimating from RC Dating some 60,000 years ago, but can they be that exact with it when the dates are much closer?


9 posted on 04/22/2008 7:42:15 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (The LibertyRocks Blog - http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com & http://www.LibertyRocks.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson