Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aerodynamic Heavy-Duty Truck Trailer Cuts Fuel Consumption and Emissions By Up to 15% (SKIRTS!)
www.greencarcongress.com ^ | 04/18/2008 | Staff

Posted on 04/17/2008 1:33:38 PM PDT by Red Badger

Creating an improved aerodynamic shape for heavy-duty truck trailers by mounting sideskirts can cut fuel consumption and emissions by up to 15%, according to road testing by the Dutch research partnership PART (Platform for Aerodynamic Road Transport). PART is a partnership between TU Delft, TNT, Scania Beers BV, FOCWA Carrosseriebouw, Ephicas, Kees Mulder Carrosserieën, Van Eck Carrosseriebouw, Syntens, Squarell Technology, Emons Group and NEA.

Sideskirts are plates which are mounted on the sides of trailers, primarily with a view to underrun protection. The new aerodynamic design of the sideskirts substantially reduces the air currents alongside and under the trailer and thereby also the air resistance.

Initial driving tests with a trailer equipped with the aerodynamic sideskirts over a straight stretch of public road revealed a cut in fuel consumption of between 5% and 15%. Subsequent research comprising long-term operational tests by TNT displayed a fuel reduction of 10%.

These results confirm calculations and findings from the wind tunnel tests that had established that the observed 14 - 18% reduction in air resistance led to 7 - 9% less fuel consumption. In practice, the figures are in fact even better.

PART expects that the cost of fitting aerodynamically-shaped sideskirts will be recouped within two years. Furthermore, the sideskirts can be fitted to approximately half the trucks currently in use in the Netherlands as the skirts can also be retrofitted.

In 2005, 10,000 new trailers were taken into use in the Netherlands. With an average fuel consumption of 30 liters per 100 kilometers [7.8 mpg US], that translates into 750 million liters of diesel consumption in the Netherlands each year. We can cut fuel consumption by 5% or more for 50% of those trailers. That means a reduction of 50 million tons of CO2 emissions a year. This research can therefore result in a substantial, structural contribution to cutting fuel consumption and an annual saving of tens of millions of Euros, next to that cut in CO2 emissions by the road transport sector.

Together with this sector we have created a practical platform for further research and development, but we still need active government participation. Just obtaining permits for all the road tests has involved a huge amount of time, energy and frustration. The next step is realizing a practical partnership between the government and industry in order to put the solutions into practice. —Prof. Michel van Tooren of TU Delft’s Aerospace Engineering faculty

Road tests have also already been initiated on boat tails. These constructions on the rear of a trailer ensure a reduction in the wake—the vacuum and air currents which arise when the trailer is moving. In theory, a boat tail could also mean a cut in air resistance of 30%, with a fuel reduction of 10 - 15%. These road tests should also confirm the earlier, highly positive results from the windtunnel.

Boat tails, however, are limited in practical use, in particular when loading and unloading—safety aspects and problems with exceeding maximum vehicle sizes prevent these being used for many types of vehicles.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 18wheelers; diesel; truck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST just FReepmail me.....

This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

WITH THE HIGH COST OF DIESEL FUEL TODAY, TRUCKER FREEPERS MAY WANT TO ADD SOME OF THESE, EVEN IF HOMEMADE, TO THEIR RIGS!.......................15% IS A BIG DEAL!!.............

1 posted on 04/17/2008 1:33:38 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; sausageseller; ...

SAVE SOME MONEY ON THE ROAD KNOCK!!!!!...............


2 posted on 04/17/2008 1:34:14 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If it stops the trucks from blinding me in the rain, I am all for it.


3 posted on 04/17/2008 1:37:13 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

I CANNOT BELIEVE IT TOOK THIS LONG FOR SOMEBODY TO COME UP WITH THIS!!...


4 posted on 04/17/2008 1:38:38 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL - stop yelling at me.

From the picture in the article, they are rigid - that poses a problem on hills.

But you are correct - it is a no-brainer.


5 posted on 04/17/2008 1:40:55 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yeah, I’d like to see that after the first re-tread lets go and explodes.


6 posted on 04/17/2008 1:43:54 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

They should get better retreading technology. I was almost hit by a fragment on the interstate once.........


7 posted on 04/17/2008 1:46:06 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

IN countries that drive on the right, driver side roadside flats are going to get a lot more complicated to fix.

They’ve had pretty much the same thing on full size RV’s for years, the added outside storage compartments. Can’t believe no one thought of this before now.

And what will action movie directors do now in their fast convertibles chase scenes?


8 posted on 04/17/2008 1:46:10 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

... or when he throws a tire chain...


9 posted on 04/17/2008 1:47:08 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
To heck with skirts, give me more wheels, and machine guns, and rockets, and...


10 posted on 04/17/2008 1:48:04 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution ? 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

THey probably fold up for service....


11 posted on 04/17/2008 1:48:58 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Well, if they’re built right, they’ll contain the debris and unfortunate car drivers won’t get flying debris through the windshield.


12 posted on 04/17/2008 1:50:11 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And now they need to realize that they should stop trying to shove all that air up and over the top of the truck, and push it along the sides. Ford came out with a concept tractor that did this, and their studies indicated doing so would increase mileage by some 14%, but nothing ever came of it.


13 posted on 04/17/2008 1:58:35 PM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
"Well, if they’re built right, they’ll contain the debris and unfortunate car drivers won’t get flying debris through the windshield."

Wishful thinking, they aren't going to be making it out of 1/4" steel. More like fiberglass or lightweight aluminum panels. Weight, weight, weight.

14 posted on 04/17/2008 1:58:56 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider

That vehicle sat for years over by the Hollywood (101) freeway not too far from the Barham exit. Used to see it all the time when I drove past. My kindof moter home... LOL


15 posted on 04/17/2008 1:59:43 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

Um, Kevlar liners?

Lightweight, strong, will contain blast. Surprise!


16 posted on 04/17/2008 2:00:36 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Next experiment will be to link 100 of these in a row and run them down the highway together. The aerodynamic improvement will be hailed as a new efficiency breakthrough.


17 posted on 04/17/2008 2:01:04 PM PDT by thulldud (Insanity: Electing John McCain again and expecting a different result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

Or you could embed the kevlar in the fiberglass... or even use it as the matrix in the mix... or you could make them out of carbon fiber, which would be the lightest material AND still be able to hold in the debris.


18 posted on 04/17/2008 2:02:16 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

IMO they could get another 15% or more if they would make that flat front more aerodynamic.

Air flowing around the back also creates a vacuum, and if they would make that more aerodynamic instead of flat, that would help also.


19 posted on 04/17/2008 2:02:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
And now they need to realize that they should stop trying to shove all that air up and over the top of the truck, and push it along the sides. Ford came out with a concept tractor that did this, and their studies indicated doing so would increase mileage by some 14%, but nothing ever came of it.

Maybe it blew cars off the road.

20 posted on 04/17/2008 2:10:55 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson