Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women from polygamist sect say officials misled them
Houston Chronicle/AP ^ | 4-15-08 | JENNIFER DOBNER and MICHAEL GRACZYK

Posted on 04/15/2008 10:27:22 AM PDT by Snickering Hound

ELDORADO — Mothers separated from their children as part of a wide-ranging abuse investigation within a polygamist retreat accuse state officials of misleading them before taking their offspring into custody.

Authorities raided the sect's ranch more than a week ago in response to allegations that underage girls were forced to marry older men. Women and children from the secretive community were taken to a West Texas fort-turned-museum and a rodeo pavilion, but on Monday officials began separating women and some of their offspring without warning, members of the sect said.

While some women and children were taken from the shelters to the nearby San Angelo Coliseum, other women were allowed to return to the ranch — but only those who were childless or had children under the age of 5.

About three dozen of the women who returned to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints ranch spoke out Monday, after 11 days in temporary shelters. They said in interviews that police surrounded them Monday and gave them a choice between returning home, or relocating to a women's shelter.

"It just feels like someone is trying to hurt us," said Paula, 38, who like other members of the sect declined to give her full name. "I do not understand how they can do this when they don't have a for sure knowledge that anyone has abused these children."

Marissa Gonzales, a spokeswoman for the Department of Family and Protective Services, said the move was a typical procedure taken by the agency.

"It is not the normal practice to allow parents to accompany the child when an abuse allegation is made," Gonzales said.

Brenda, a 37-year-old mother of two teenage boys, said the women were threatened with arrest if they resisted the court order. Previously, the women had been told they would stay with the children at least until Thursday, when a custody hearing is scheduled, she said.

A call to CPS for comment late Monday on the women's claims was not immediately returned.

CPS's closing of the shelters came a day after three mothers from the ranch petitioned Gov. Rick Perry to inspect the shelters to see firsthand how families were being treated. The women said the living conditions were cramped and that some of the children had become sick.

About 20 children were recovering from a mild case of chicken pox, said Dr. Sandra Guerra-Cantu with the state Health Department.

Perry spokesman Robert Black said the governor did not believe the children were being housed in poor conditions at the West Texas fort.

"Let's be honest here, this is not the Ritz," Black said. But he called the accommodations "clean and neat."

CPS said officials have been planning the move for a week but that the coliseum was unavailable earlier. About two dozen teenage boys were moved to a facility outside San Angelo with the judge's permission, CPS said. The location was not released.

The state is accusing the sect of physically and sexually abusing the youngsters and wants to strip their parents of custody and place the children in foster care or put them up for adoption. The sheer size of the case was an obstacle.

"Quite frankly, I'm not sure what we're going to do," state District Judge Barbara Walther said after a conference that included three to four dozen attorneys either representing or hoping to represent youngsters.

Brenda and others were critical of CPS, saying the agency misled them as to what was to happen Monday, weren't told why the children were removed from the compound and given inaccurate messages about opportunities to meet attorneys.

"We got to where we said, 'We cannot believe a word you say. We cannot trust you,'" she said.

Officials said the investigation began with a call from a young girl who has yet to be located by CPS. The women in the sect said they suspect she may be a bitter ex-member of the church.

The FLDS practice polygamy in arranged marriages, sometimes between underage girls and older men. The group has thousands of followers in two side-by-side towns in Arizona and Utah.

The church has repeatedly fought because of its lifestyle before. Men, women and children have been swept up in raids that took place in 1935, 1944 and 1953.

"It's been all through history, " said Brenda, the mother of two. "We were just here trying to live a peaceful, happy, sweet life. We don't understand why we can't do this freely."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: allyourkidsare; belongtogovernment; churchandstate; cps; flds; guiltyuntildisproven; jeffs; lds; mormons; parentalrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-374 next last
To: lady lawyer

Pillow fights?


61 posted on 04/15/2008 12:30:43 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Doesn’t fit here.
We are “They”, and We are going after these filthy minded, vile excuses for parents, with Texas guns a blazing.


62 posted on 04/15/2008 12:32:28 PM PDT by prayforpeaceofJerusalem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Maybe you are confusing the Bible with the Doctrine & Covenants. The C&C and not the Bible, plainly states that God commands and condones polygamy. No wonder you LDS Mormons defend it so.

D&C 132:34-40 http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/132

34 God commanded Abraham, and Sarah gave Hagar to Abraham to wife. And why did she do it? Because this was the law; and from Hagar sprang many people. This, therefore, was fulfilling, among other things, the promises.

35 Was Abraham, therefore, under condemnation? Verily I say unto you, Nay; for I, the Lord, commanded it.

36 Abraham was commanded to offer his son Isaac; nevertheless, it was written: Thou shalt not kill. Abraham, however, did not refuse, and it was accounted unto him for righteousness.

37 Abraham received concubines, and they bore him children; and it was accounted unto him for righteousness, because they were given unto him, and he bode in my law; as Isaac also and Jacob did none other things than that which they were commanded; and because they did none other things than that which they were commanded, they have entered into their exaltation, according to the promises, and sit upon thrones, and are not angels but are gods.

38 David also received many wives and concubines, and also Solomon and Moses my servants, as also many others of my servants, from the beginning of creation until this time; and in nothing did they sin save in those things which they received not of me.

39 David’s wives and concubines were given unto him of me, by the hand of Nathan, my servant, and others of the prophets who had the keys of this power; and in none of these things did he sin against me save in the case of eUriah and his wife; and, therefore he hath fallen from his exaltation, and received his portion; and he shall not inherit them out of the world, for I gave them unto another, saith the Lord.

40 I am the Lord thy God, and I gave unto thee, my servant Joseph, an appointment, and restore all things. Ask what ye will, and it shall be given unto you according to my word.


63 posted on 04/15/2008 12:36:18 PM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

No comparison.
Children bred generation after generation to feed the lusts of vile, filthy old men [themselves bred to believe that might makes right]is not in the Bible.
There is a comparison of sorts, though, to Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities of the plain, in this behavior. If you go read about their framing iniquity by law, as found in the Book of Jasher, before YHWH nuked ‘em.
http://www.ccel.org/a/anonymous/jasher/home.html


64 posted on 04/15/2008 12:37:00 PM PDT by prayforpeaceofJerusalem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Infighting over who is the real mormon?
FLDS follow the founding fathers of Mormonism.


65 posted on 04/15/2008 12:40:46 PM PDT by prayforpeaceofJerusalem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Abraham didn’t HAVE a polygamous marriage. He had a concubine, because of Sarah’s lack of faith. That situation ended in disaster that is still having repercussions today.

Isaac was not polygamous.


66 posted on 04/15/2008 12:47:06 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Better a leftist Dem with energized GOP opposition, than a leftist "Republican" with no opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

I asked for one Biblical scripture condemning Abraham or Israel for practicing polygamy. No one can quote me one, because there isn’t one. So you change the subject.


67 posted on 04/15/2008 12:47:24 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NativeTxn
I read somewhere last weekend that Warren Jeffords or whatever the cult leader's name is had gone to the other cult places before the move to Texas and taken children under 6yrs old and brought them to the complex without their parents. Now, I wonder why he did that and now it makes sense why none of the children seem to know their names or their parents!

These poor children. I hope this man is never released. This whole thing makes me sooo sad for all these children.

68 posted on 04/15/2008 12:48:44 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (A good man has come home to San Diego! Thank you Congressman Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Are you saying that parents don’t have the right to determine how their children will be brought up?


69 posted on 04/15/2008 12:49:13 PM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
The stuff about the supposed used of beds in the temple came from a disaffected member who left the group before it even had a temple. It may or may not be true.

For someone who so loudly declared that these "people" are not Mormons, you sure sound like you are defending them in your susequent posts. Hmmmm.... very odd

70 posted on 04/15/2008 12:51:45 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (A good man has come home to San Diego! Thank you Congressman Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Abraham’s wives had different legal status, that is true, but he was still polygamous.

And, you can’t deny that Jacob/Israel was polygamous. So was Moses. We know of at least two wives, Zipporah and the Ethiopian woman.


71 posted on 04/15/2008 12:51:46 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Look LL, you have been given scriptures showing God’s plan for marriage is one man, one woman. You have seen scriptures showing the ravages of the sin of “adding wives,” and yet you can’t accept them. Is it because of your “new” scriptures like those found in the D&C?

Give me one Biblical scripture condemning slavery. Yes, I am changing the subject.

The subject NOW is, “if the Bible doesn’t outrightly condemn something, does that mean it is God’s commandment?”


72 posted on 04/15/2008 12:53:13 PM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

I don’t agree with their practice of polygamy. But that doesn’t mean I think families should be torn apart, and little children taken away from their mothers, on a phony search warrant, backed up by allegations that no one can corroborate.


73 posted on 04/15/2008 12:53:40 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
“Where in the Bible does it say that Abraham and Israel were committing sin by their polygamous marriages?”

It doesn't. However, like divorce which was legal under the Mosaic Law, Jesus raised the standard; forbidding divorce and affirming the proper marriage of one man & one woman.

74 posted on 04/15/2008 12:58:09 PM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

The Bible describes what were probably monogamous marriages. The Bible also describes holy men — prophets and patriarchs — engaging in polygamous marriages without condemnation.

The Bible mentions slavery. The Bible does not, to my knowledge, describe holy men being slavemasters.

The Bible never says that Abraham having Hagar for a (second tier) wife was a sin. That is pure interpretation. The Bible never says that Israel having (at least) four wives was a sin. That is gloss placed on the Bible by others, whom you apparently agree with, as is your right.


75 posted on 04/15/2008 12:58:32 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY

Paul said that a bishop should be the husband of one wife. That’s the only thing that I can think of in the New Testament that speaks directly to the issue.


76 posted on 04/15/2008 12:59:35 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Joseph Smith was not a false prophet.


77 posted on 04/15/2008 1:00:26 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

I just love it when Mormons defend polygamy. Thanks for being so honest and forthright in your beliefs!


78 posted on 04/15/2008 1:02:01 PM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
I asked for one Biblical scripture condemning Abraham or Israel for practicing polygamy. No one can quote me one, because there isn’t one. So you change the subject.

Classical misdirection technique.

79 posted on 04/15/2008 1:02:32 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

It wasn’t misdirection. We have people on this and other threads hollering that polygamy is a sin, and unbiblical. I’ve simply asked them to show me where the Bible says so. They can’t.

They can provide plenty of interpretation by their preachers that it must be a sin. But they can’t find anything in the Bible that says so. This is particularly true where men that are supposedly revered by Bible-believing people as prophets were unquestionably practicing polygamy. Where do you think the Twelve Tribes came from?

It is not “misdirection” to ask a person who believes that all they need is the Bible to point out something in the Bible that actually supports what they are saying.


80 posted on 04/15/2008 1:05:22 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-374 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson