Posted on 04/13/2008 9:47:53 AM PDT by MaestroLC
Al-Qaida's nuclear attack against the US is in planning stages, top American intelligence officials have said.
Deposing before a Congressional Committee on Homeland Security early this week, these US intelligence officials told US lawmakers that the threat of nuclear attack by the Taliban was growing and there is need to enhance its security measures.
Charles Allen, Undersecretary for Intelligence and Analysis and Chief Intelligence Officer at the Department of Homeland Security; and Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, the director of Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence for the Department of Energy testified before this key Congressional committee on nuclear terrorism on April 2.
''There's been a long-term effort by Al-Qaida, to develop an improvised nuclear device,'' Allen said. ''I have no doubt that Al-Qaida would like to obtain nuclear capability. I think the evidence in their statements that they've made over many years publicly indicate this,'' he argued in his testimony.
Giving details of the Al-Qaida preparation, based on years on intelligence inputs, Mowatt-Larssen said: ''An Al-Qaida nuclear attack would be in the planning stages at the same time as several other plots, and only Al-Qaida's most senior leadership will know which plot will be approved.''
In keeping with Al-Qaida's normal management structures such as the role of Khalid Sheikh Muhammad in the 9/11 attacks, Mowatt-Larssen said there is probably a single individual in charge, overseeing the effort to obtain materials and expertise.
The intelligence officials commented that some nuclear experts / scientists may have joined Al-Qaida years ago, long before the world began paying adequate attention to the proliferation of the kinds of technologies that could yield a terrorist nuclear weapon.
Referring to the planning of the 9/11 attack, Mowatt-Larssen said it was operationally very straightforward. ''It had a very small footprint, was highly compartmented. Al-Qaida's nuclear effort would be just as compartmented and probably would not require the involvement of more than a small number of operatives who carried out 9/11,'' he said.
Mowatt-Larssen then went out to divulge his information about a prototypical Al-Qaida nuclear attack plot. This would have, he said, approval and oversight from Al-Qaida's most senior leadership, with possible assistance from other groups and a planner responsible for organizing the material, expertise and fabrication of a device; operational support facilitator, responsible for arranging travel, money, documents, food and other necessities for the cell; assets in the United States or within range of other Western targets to case locations for an attack and to help move the attack team into place; and finally, the attack team itself.
This hearing was followed by another classified session wherein other details about the possible nuclear attack by the Al-Qaida terrorist network were possibly explained to the US lawmakers in details.
''Beyond the basics I have outlined here, we do not know what a terrorist plot might look like. There is, however, a chokepoint in a terrorist effort to develop a nuclear capability. It is impossible to build a nuclear weapon without fissile material,'' he said.
The officials said that the task for the intelligence community is not easy. ''We must find something that is tactical in size but strategic in impact. We must find a plot with its networks that cut across traditional lines of counter proliferation and counterterrorism. We must stop something from happening that we have never seen happen before,'' he said.
Mowatt-Larssen said the US successes against Taliban in Afghanistan have yielded volumes of information that completely changed its view of Al-Qaida's nuclear program. ''We learned that Al-Qaida wants a weapon to use, not a weapon to sustain and build a stockpile, as most states would,'' he said.
''The nuclear threats that surfaced in June 2002 and continued through the fall of 2003 demonstrated that Al-Qaida's desire for a nuclear capability may have survived their removal from their Afghanistan safe haven,'' he said.
Observing that the Al-Qaida's nuclear intent remains clear, he said it obtained a fatwa in May 2003 that approved the use of weapons of mass destruction. Al-Qaida spokesman Suleyman Abu Ghayth declared that it is Al-Qaida's right to kill four million Americans in retaliation for Muslim deaths that Al-Qaida blames on the United States.
''Osama bin Laden said in 1998 that it was an Islamic duty to acquire weapons of mass destruction. In 2006, bin Laden reiterated his statement that Al-Qaida will return to the United States.
He said Al-Qaida has a track record of returning to finish a job they started. They failed at the World Trade Center in 1993. They came back in 2001. They canceled plans for chemical attacks in the US in 2003. ''We do not yet know when and where they intend to strike us next, but our past experience strongly suggests they are seeking an attack more spectacular than 9/11,'' he said.
''To delve a little into how they may be thinking about the nuclear option, at any given moment, Al-Qaida probably has attack plans in development. Nine-eleven was planned when the USS Cole was attacked in Yemen and when our embassies in Dar es Salaam and Tanzania were attacked in Africa,'' he said.
You don’t ‘improvise’ a nuclear devvice. Dead give-away this is a spoof article.
Obama will talk them out of it. We know he can.
It is impossible to build a nuclear weapon without fissile material,’’ he said. ...
You mean the stuff the Iranians are working on?
I really wonder if they realize that if they nuke us, Islam will be erradicated and muslims the world over will be decimated. That’s not a good thing - it will be a bllodbath the likes of which the world has never seen - but it is what will happen...
In that case every BBQ joint in the country will be ordered to stop serving pork — and the wearing the hijab will required of all women.
Wellllll... You *can* improvise an *atomic* device - see “gun-type” atomic devices.
All you need is the fissile material. And Iran has some.
You’ll shoot your eye out.
Nah... Jimmah Carter will make the rounds and say "I come in peace, brother" and all will be well.
Hahahahah......
All joking and Red Ryder jokes aside, a gun-type is the easiest to make. Couple kids in my high school actually made one (without fissile material) for their senior science project.
I agree....one very stupid move on the fanatics part. Opps forgot...fanatics can’t think with a sane mind.
“Dead give-away this is a spoof article”
____________________________
confused by what you mean by this. the hearing did take place on april 2.
From the Washington Post: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/activity/2008/apr/02/
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (11 a.m.): Holds a hearing on “Nuclear Terrorism: Assessing the Threat to the Homeland.” Homeland Security Chief Intelligence Officer Charles Allen; Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, director of the Energy Department’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; Matthew Bunn of the Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; and Gary Ackerman of the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, testify. Contact: 202-224-2627 or Sheila Menz (Lieberman), 202-224-1389 or Jen Burita (Collins), 202-224-4751 342 Dirksen.
“You don’t ‘improvise’ a nuclear devvice. Dead give-away this is a spoof article.”
A “dirty bomb” could be considered an improvised device — they “just” spread nuclear material all over a major city and contaminate it for years.
“Mowatt-Larssen said there is probably a single individual in charge, overseeing the effort to obtain materials and expertise. “
__________________
His name - Adnan El Shukrijumah
lots of info on him here on FR and elsewhere.
Nuke Mecca during Hajj.
IMO-I’m surprised they haven’t used one already.Why build a nuke from scratch?With AQ’s financial resources-i find it hard to believe they couldn’t simply purchase one(or more)nukes from a corrupt official in the former Soviet Union.From what i’ve read i understand the security at some of the storage facilities isn’t exactly top notch.Same with biological/chemical weapons.
This insinuates that Iran is in on it.
Agreed. Nothing will persuade the world to eradicate Islam more than a nuke attack on ANY city - American or otherwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.