Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear scientists eye future landfall on a second 'island of stability' (atomic number 164?)
Chemistry Times ^ | 4/8/08

Posted on 04/08/2008 10:56:22 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Modern-day scientific Magellans and Columbus's, exploring the uncharted seas at the fringes of the Periodic Table of the Elements, have landed on one long-sought island - the fabled Island of Stability, home of a new genre of superheavy chemical elements sought for more than three decades.

In a presentation at the 235th national meeting of the American Chemical Society, one of the captains of these expeditions into the unknown, described how researchers now are eying other islands on the more-distant fringes of the periodic table.

"Now that it has been shown that the 'island of stability' of superheavy elements exists, it would be interesting to predict the position of other islands," said Yuri Oganessian, Ph.D., of Russia's Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna. He is the scientific leader at the Institute's Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions.

The discovery of superheavy elements at the beginning of this century by Oganessian's group also confirmed the existence of the Island of Stability, a theoretical region of the periodic table, which distinguished chemist and Nobel laureate Glenn Seaborg considered as one of the keystones of fundamental science. The "sea-and-island" analogy arose because these superheavy elements lie in an area of the periodic table where other elements are unstable, disappearing in much less than the blink of an eye. The superheavies, in contrast, are somewhat more stable than their shorter-lived cousins.

Oganessian's group has teamed with California's Lawrence Livermore Laboratory to synthesize five new elements (113, 114, 115, 116, and 118) over the past six years. Such superheavy elements do not exist in nature and can only be created by smashing lighter elements together at tremendous speeds obtained by means of highly sophisticated particle accelerators.

The periodic table, a fixture on the walls of science classrooms around the world, lists all the chemical elements. These materials make up everything in the universe, from human beings, medicines, and food to stars and swirling clouds of gas a billion light-years across the universe. Click here (pubs.acs.org/cen/80th/elements.html) to view the ACS's interactive Periodic Table of the Elements.

The first 92 elements on the table exist naturally. The rest - which now extend to element 118 - were created by scientists in atomic nuclei collision with the aid of particle accelerators. Aptly named, these machines accelerate atoms to nearly 1/10 the speed of light and smash them into other so-called "target" atoms. Sometimes the nuclei of two colliding atoms fuse and a new element is formed.

Oganessian and his colleagues are currently using Dubna's particle accelerator in an attempt to synthesize yet another superheavy element, No. 120, to add more territory to the island of stability. Strikingly, Oganessian believes that another, more distant, island of stability lies further out in that sea at the periodic table's fringes.

"The next island is located very far from the first one," said Oganessian. How far away might that next island be" In terms of numbers on the periodic table, it could lie around atomic number 164, as some theorists predicted, certainly a long way from where researchers are exploring today in hopes of discovering element 120.

But reaching the shores of the next island of stability will require a more deep understanding of the processes of element formation and a newer, more sophisticated particle accelerator, Oganessian believes.

In order to study the physical and chemical properties of the current and yet-to-be discovered superheavy elements, the researchers will need to produce many more nuclides than they have been able to do so far, according to Oganessian.

"For this purpose, we need to increase the beam intensity, which will demand a new accelerator," Oganessian said.

It is difficult to anticipate what practical uses might come out of the search for new superheavy elements. For now, the focus is on discovery, not application. However, some previously synthesized elements have yielded tremendous benefits for people. One example, element 95 - Americium - discovered in 1944, is used in smoke detectors and in medical and industrial radiography.

Oganessian declined to speculate on potential uses of future superheavy elements, but noted that it will take revolutionary new technology to produce large enough amounts of these elements to make them of practical use. Although he said it is hard for him to imagine such a technology, he expressed faith in the abilities of future researchers.

"I don't want to fantasize, but if they can devise a method for the production of superheavy elements in large quantities, I am sure they can find some worthy application for these elements," Oganessian said.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: chemistry; elements; island; periodic; stability; superheavy; table
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2008 10:56:23 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I had no idea that any artificial element had ever existed for more than a fraction of a second—let alone that I had one in my house!


2 posted on 04/08/2008 11:02:47 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Perhaps unobtanium will be found after all................


3 posted on 04/08/2008 11:03:52 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Eka-Platinum ping


4 posted on 04/08/2008 11:04:10 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Clickable link: pubs.acs.org/cen/80th/elements.html

When I learned the table in school, 104 was the end of the line although not yet created.

5 posted on 04/08/2008 11:04:48 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

When I was in school it was 4.

Air · Fire · Water · Earth


6 posted on 04/08/2008 11:07:18 AM PDT by OSHA (<---Typical white person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Perhaps unobtanium will be found after all................"

Yeah, but when they do, they'll rename it to Voilaium.

7 posted on 04/08/2008 11:08:40 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Perhaps unobtanium will be found after all................

And in the next island of stability, eka-unobtanium!

8 posted on 04/08/2008 11:09:34 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

But it only lasts for four hours, so they’ll haveta call it Viagrium......


9 posted on 04/08/2008 11:10:24 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OSHA
"When I was in school it was 4. Air · Fire · Water · Earth"

Your thinking of Earth Wind & Fire. Funny how the 60's make you forget your schoolin.

10 posted on 04/08/2008 11:10:40 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

>>I had no idea that any artificial element had ever existed for more than a fraction of a second<<

Dear Arthur McGowan,

Plutonium is a transuranic element (all elements with an Atomic Number of greater than 92 - the Atomic Number of Uranium - are so-called transuranics) and is used in some atomic bombs (like the one dropped on Nagasaki, “Fat Man;” the Hiroshima bomb was a Uranium bomb.)

It goes without saying that Pu-239 (the isotope used in the bomb) has a halflife of much more than a fraction of a second. In fact, its halflife is approx. 24,000 years.

Regards,


11 posted on 04/08/2008 11:11:24 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Or they’ll find Corbomite instead..............


12 posted on 04/08/2008 11:12:02 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’d rather see viagrium on the periodic chart than impotium.


13 posted on 04/08/2008 11:12:05 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

or dysfunctium..............


14 posted on 04/08/2008 11:14:10 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

The Elements
By Tom Lehrer

Now, if I may digress momentarily from the main stream of this evenings symposium, I’d like to sing a song which is completely pointless but is something which I picked up during my career as a scientist. This may prove useful to some of you some day perhaps, in a somewhat bizarre set of circumstances. It’s simply the names of the chemical elements set to a possibly recognizable tune.

There’s antimony, arsenic, aluminum, selenium,
And hydrogen and oxygen and nitrogen and rhenium,
And nickel, neodymium, neptunium, germanium,
And iron, americium, ruthenium, uranium,
Europium, zirconium, lutetium, vanadium,
And lanthanum and osmium and astatine and radium,
And gold and protactinium and indium and gallium,
< gasp >
And iodine and thorium and thulium and thallium.

There’s yttrium, ytterbium, actinium, rubidium,
And boron, gadolinium, niobium, iridium,
And strontium and silicon and silver and samarium,
And bismuth, bromine, lithium, beryllium, and barium.

Isn’t that interesting?
I knew you would.
I hope you’re all taking notes, because there’s going to be a short quiz next period.

There’s holmium and helium and hafnium and erbium,
And phosphorus and francium and fluorine and terbium,
And manganese and mercury, molybdenum, magnesium,
Dysprosium and scandium and cerium and cesium.
And lead, praseodymium, and platinum, plutonium,
Palladium, promethium, potassium, polonium,
And tantalum, technetium, titanium, tellurium,
< gasp >
And cadmium and calcium and chromium and curium.

There’s sulfur, californium, and fermium, berkelium,
And also mendelevium, einsteinium, nobelium,
And argon, krypton, neon, radon, xenon, zinc, and rhodium,
And chlorine, carbon, cobalt, copper, tungsten, tin, and sodium.

These are the only ones of which the news has come to Haaaaaaaahrvard,
And there may be many others, but they haven’t been discovered.
Now, may I have the next slide please?
Got carried away there.


15 posted on 04/08/2008 11:15:32 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The first 92 elements on the table exist naturally.

Not technetium (atomic number 43) or promethium (atomic number 61). Their longest half lives are 4.2 million years and 17.7 years respectively.

16 posted on 04/08/2008 11:27:58 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

They will have a problem since the superheavy will eat all its electrons.


17 posted on 04/08/2008 11:30:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Perhaps unobtanium will be found after all................

I have quite a few parts on my 38 year old Porsche that are made from unobtanium. The problem isn't finding it. It's finding MORE of it.

18 posted on 04/08/2008 11:41:40 AM PDT by BubbaBasher (Without the 2nd ammendment there would be no 1st ammendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I would settle for a stable 3.


19 posted on 04/08/2008 11:47:37 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

And all this time, I thought you had named yourself!


20 posted on 04/08/2008 11:50:27 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson