Skip to comments.
The case for Vice President Coburn
Politico ^
| 4/3/08
| JEREMY LOTT
Posted on 04/03/2008 10:08:38 AM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
coburn would be an interesting choice. would conservatives be happy with coburn on the ticket ?
1
posted on
04/03/2008 10:08:39 AM PDT
by
kingattax
To: kingattax
Yep, and he’s been in cahoots with McCain over talks on the economy. I think he’s McCain’s best pick (of the ones that McCain might pick!)
To: kingattax
Almost any of the Okies would be good.
Judging by most of their elected representatives, Oklahoma is the sanest state in the US.
3
posted on
04/03/2008 10:12:11 AM PDT
by
EyeGuy
To: kingattax
At first, I though he was talking about James Coburn...
4
posted on
04/03/2008 10:12:53 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: kingattax
Nobody seems to get it. John McCain wants NOTHING to do with Conservatives. He believes that we'll vote for him no matter what. All it takes is the random NY Times hit piece and the Conservatives will vote for him out of spite.
Our focus should be getting as many conservative congressmen elected as possible.
To: kingattax
I would be ecstatic if Coburn were the VP nominee!
I’ve heard him speak. He’s rational and intelligent. I believe that he could hold his own against the Dems VP nominee.
But then again, I also thought Jack Kemp would hold his own against Al Gore back in ‘96 and Kemop looked like a deer in the headlights in their only debate.
Geographically, I’m not sure it’s the best pick in the world. Oklahoma is gonna be a red state. But then again, Bush did pick Cheney - who was from Wyoming.
6
posted on
04/03/2008 10:14:32 AM PDT
by
MplsSteve
To: kingattax
Fred Grandy was talking about him this morning on
WMAL. There are a couple strikes against him though: 1) OK isn't a state with a lot of electoral votes; 2) There are already entirely too many senators running for the White House.
7
posted on
04/03/2008 10:15:37 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
("McCain is a war hero. He's also a useful idiot for the Democrats." - Mark Levin)
To: Army Air Corps
8
posted on
04/03/2008 10:16:43 AM PDT
by
50sDad
(Liberals: Never Happy, Never Grateful, Never Right.)
To: 50sDad
Our Man Flynt! Wonder if they're related? It's not a common name.
9
posted on
04/03/2008 10:18:36 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
("McCain is a war hero. He's also a useful idiot for the Democrats." - Mark Levin)
To: MuttTheHoople
Our focus should be getting as many conservative congressmen elected as possible.
:::::::
This is true and it must happen. But so must getting McCain in the White House. While he is not a conservative on many issues, as we well know, he will certainly be better than putting a power-mad, inept, socialist, Marxist in the Oval Office — that would be a disaster without any doubt. At there is a chance with McCain.
10
posted on
04/03/2008 10:20:26 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: kingattax
Senator Inhofe would be even better.
But I think Rob Portman is more likely. Like Lincoln, McCain would like to have God on his side, but he must have Ohio ( In the Lincoln quote it was Kentucky ).
11
posted on
04/03/2008 10:20:30 AM PDT
by
devere
(http://www.usmm.net/p2/thiswar.jpg)
To: kingattax
We conservatives would be ecstatic if McCain chose Tom Coburn as his running mate. Coburn would help in holding McCain's feet to the fire on several key issues. Especially immigration reform. The rightwing would have a solid conservative and outspoken voice to count on.
12
posted on
04/03/2008 10:22:19 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(McCain Wants My Conservative Vote --- EARN IT or NO DEAL !!!)
To: kingattax
Oh yeh, that's the ticket for Coburn.
It might satisfy conservatives but I can't see Coburn letting himself be made into a Dan Quayle.
And that's what would happen.
13
posted on
04/03/2008 10:22:32 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: kingattax
one of the most radical of the freshman Republicans....
My kind of guy BUT, I don't think McCain has the 'nads to pick a "radical" Conservative as his running mate and the media would "Goldwater" him like they did Barry Goldwater in '64. They would portray him as a wild-eyed, crazy man.
14
posted on
04/03/2008 10:23:08 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Barack Obama's Pastor is nuttier than a squirrel turd.)
To: princess leah
since mcCain is totally enamored with his ‘maverick’ image, don’t be surprised if his pick is off the wall and makes absolutely no political sense.
15
posted on
04/03/2008 10:25:02 AM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: kingattax
Coburn is a good guy, but the last thing we need is another SENATOR in this race.
Enough with the Senators!
16
posted on
04/03/2008 10:25:53 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Agreed. Senators historically don’t do well in Presidential elections. We don’t need to overload the ticket with them.
17
posted on
04/03/2008 10:27:38 AM PDT
by
CougarGA7
(Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
To: kingattax
>> coburn would be an interesting choice. would conservatives be happy with coburn on the ticket ? <<
I, for one, would be ECSTATIC!
Hell, I might even vote for that ticket :^D.
18
posted on
04/03/2008 10:35:32 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: kingattax
I think the people would be happy but the Senate would be scared to death. He’s a good man and I think an honest one. Now wouldn’t that be a change for the American people......the people would love it.
19
posted on
04/03/2008 10:40:59 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: kingattax
McCain/Hagel in '08.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson