Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's How to End the [Financial] Panic
Forbes Magazine ^ | 7 April 2008 | Steve Forbes

Posted on 03/31/2008 6:12:11 PM PDT by shrinkermd

...The weak dollar is pummeling equities, disrupting the economy, distorting global trade and giving hundreds of billions of dollars in windfall revenues--through skyrocketing commodity prices--to our adversaries such as Iran and Venezuela. Not since Jimmy Carter has the U.S. had a President so oblivious to the damage done by an increasingly feeble greenback.

...The U.S. Treasury Department could buy dollars in the currency exchange markets. Our allies would gladly cooperate with such an operation; their exports are being hurt more and more. The Fed could mop up some of the excess liquidity it has created since 2004, even as it makes targeted loans to beleaguered banks and financial houses...

...The other measure: The Treasury Department and the Fed should get together with the SEC, the Comptroller of the Currency and other bank regulators and announce that financial institutions for the next 12 months will no longer write down the value of exotic financial instruments (primarily packages of subprime mortgages). Instead, writedowns will occur only when there have been actual losses on those assets. If a mortgage defaults, a bank will then--and only then--recognize the l

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: balancesheet; dollar; endingpanic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Both of these proposals--defending the dollar and temporarily protecting the balance sheet--could be implemented almost overnight.

It is a tragedy of the first order that we are not running Steve Forbes for either President or VP. He knows what can be done now rather than years in the future. Just what is needed in a panic.

1 posted on 03/31/2008 6:12:19 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Good post.


2 posted on 03/31/2008 6:16:27 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I like Teve Torbes. And Dob Bole does too. ;)

He’d get my vote!


3 posted on 03/31/2008 6:20:45 PM PDT by Redgirl (Be excellent to each other! - Bill and Ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Bump for later. Thanks.


4 posted on 03/31/2008 6:21:43 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
It is a tragedy of the first order that we are not running Steve Forbes for either President or VP.....

Ditto

5 posted on 03/31/2008 6:22:00 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Maybe not for prez, but Secretary of the Treasury might be a great post if he’s willing to serve.


6 posted on 03/31/2008 6:24:19 PM PDT by PrincessB ("I am an expert on my own opinion." - Dave Ramsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I like Forbes but he could never win the presidency. Sorry, I know it’s not fair but you have to be at least a little bit telegenic.


7 posted on 03/31/2008 6:29:33 PM PDT by G.Love ( Romney '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
It is a tragedy of the first order that we are not running Steve Forbes for either President or VP.

Oh, really, could you give me the links to his statements about this happening eight are ten years ago, are even five years ago. Are is this just more closing the barn door after the fact.

8 posted on 03/31/2008 6:34:18 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

“...The other measure: The Treasury Department and the Fed should get together with the SEC, the Comptroller of the Currency and other bank regulators and announce that financial institutions for the next 12 months will no longer write down the value of exotic financial instruments (primarily packages of subprime mortgages). Instead, writedowns will occur only when there have been actual losses on those assets. If a mortgage defaults, a bank will then—and only then—recognize the l [oss]

All righty then, Mr. Banker, I have roughly $2 trillion in Alt-A mortgage tranches available. They remain rated triple A by Moody’s. Their yield is 7%, but just for you, I’ll discount the face values so that they yield 9%. You, Mr. Banker, can borrow at the Fed window for about 3%, so it seems to me you have a risk-free 6% ROI opportunity here with substantial upside if the implied internal defaults can be cured. Can I interest you in a few hundred million?

[crickets]

Non-starter. Unless you can get the banks’ employees to mot cash their paychecks but agree that they are being paid, and the local electic company to agree that the banks’ electric bills are being paid.

The solution to this problem does NOT lie along a road paved with further fictions and non-transparency. A loan that is not being serviced isn’t worth its face value, nor is a tranche of loans wherein 137 of 500 total are not being serviced worth its face value.


9 posted on 03/31/2008 6:38:00 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (We've checked, and all your zeroes are OK. We're still working on your ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Love
...."you have to be at least a little bit telegenic".....

You mean like Hillary and Obama? I missed the tingle running up my leg when Obama was running on the beach with his shirt off. Me and Chris Matthews just have different tastes I guess. McCain might get the Grey Panthers warmed up though.

10 posted on 03/31/2008 6:39:48 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PrincessB
Sec'y of Treasury would be great, or chairman of the FED. I knew Bernanke was a dang Keynesian right from the start, and he's proving it every day. Now, with Paulsen promoting de-facto nationalization, you just have to wonder which party won in 2004...
11 posted on 03/31/2008 6:40:52 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: G.Love
...."you have to be at least a little bit telegenic".....

You mean like Hillary and Obama? I missed the tingle running up my leg when Obama was running on the beach with his shirt off. Me and Chris Matthews just have different tastes I guess. McCain might get the Grey Panthers warmed up though.

12 posted on 03/31/2008 6:41:12 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PrincessB
Sec'y of Treasury would be great, or chairman of the FED. I knew Bernanke was a dang Keynesian right from the start, and he's proving it every day. Now, with Paulsen promoting de-facto nationalization, you just have to wonder which party won in 2004...
13 posted on 03/31/2008 6:41:17 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
That bird has flown - at this point no one is taking the previous valuations seriously, and the advantage of mark to market is that it provides a reasonably objective measure of the relative strength of current players.

The alternative is to find ourselves in the position of the Japanese a decade ago: the stakeholders in overvalued assets keep hoping that things will somehow turn around, and in the meantime investment grinds to a halt as everyone waits for some combination of events to force their holders to realistically (re)value assets.

14 posted on 03/31/2008 6:51:59 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Not since Jimmy Carter has the U.S. had a President so oblivious to the damage done by an increasingly feeble greenback

Gosh...not so long ago a statement like that would get you run off this forum.

But now we have a guy like Forbes saying it.

Times do change, don't they?

15 posted on 03/31/2008 7:13:19 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I honestly disagree with Mr.Forbes about this. He says that “...The weak dollar is ... disrupting the economy, distorting global trade...”

I believe that the bigger problem during the last fifteen years is that the dollar has been too strong, and that this situation is merely correcting a distortion. Of course, the correction will involve some pain, but in the end, American exports will become more competitive, Americans will gain more jobs, and more American energy and other products will be produced at home.


16 posted on 03/31/2008 7:43:41 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
IMHO, waiting until losses accrue before writing down the sub-prime debt would make things far, far worse. By writing down in advance, a lot of uncertainty is removed from the market. Markets don't like uncertainty — Forbes’ approach would just leave a whole Imelda Marcos’ closet worth of other shoes waiting to drop.
17 posted on 03/31/2008 7:45:13 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

What do you buy our own currency back with?


18 posted on 03/31/2008 7:52:42 PM PDT by TheBattman (LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This is an April Fools Day story. The truth is that since 2004 the Fed has been tightening the discount rate ~ sopping up excess liquidity so fast we have a dramatic domestic deflationary spiral underway.

There was another supposedly authoritative story of similar nature on the net today. The idea was that the EU currency zone is suffering 4%+ inflation which is why they are holding to high discount rates ~ the consequence of this is the Euro is skyrocketing in value against every other currency.

Both of these storys follow a pattern ~ they correlate two well-known paths, but one portrayal of one path is the opposite of the usual conclusion.

People fall for this stuff like crazy.

What is most amazing is that if you listen closely to top level economists they provide explanations remarkably similar to these stories ~ then stuff just happens anyway.

19 posted on 03/31/2008 8:04:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Steve Forbes is a scofflaw. He believes there is nothing wrong with foreign nationals here illegally, that illegal aliens flooding into this country in violation of our sovereignty is OK. In fact, he thinks it is a great idea!


20 posted on 03/31/2008 8:11:33 PM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately seeking a conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson