Posted on 03/31/2008 11:21:45 AM PDT by kingattax
NO.
If he's elected, MacFart will be a one termer. So, he'll want to establish his legacy right away, which means he'll bypass the republicans and have any potential judicial appointments first vetted by Teddy Kennedy. Afterward, the MSM will purr admiringly about how refreshing it is to finally have a mature, insightful man in The Oval Office willing to work in a bi-partisan fashion to take care of the country's business.
And I am being serious. Look at his history of governance and show me there's evidence that he'd do otherwise.
i really do not see what is "likely" about this... more like wishful thinking... i guess i must say it again--libs do not vote on principle... they support their own, no matter what... in other words, even though McCain is not very conservative, he would need a D next to his name...
And you have way too much faith in the electorate or are thinking of a John MacCain other than the very senior senator from Arizona. It's only a small percentage of us who get our information from more sources than just the MSM.
I’m voting for only senator and congressman, as I can’t condone McCain’s further globalization of America (i.e. amnesty and last week’s speech on American timidity) and his global warming bunk.
Hahahahaha... Sorry but statistics don’t back you up.
Folks know who HillBilly is, and Fauxbama’s pastor has made darn sure middle america knows who he is... these two are toast.. no amount of propoganda will change it.
You can keep thinking that CBS news and the NYT rules the world... but in case you haven’t noticed, they don’t.
Fractious conservatives? I must not be one of those.
Indistinguishable, especially on judges.
I thought Mark Twain came up with that one.
Not now, but anyone who's followed politics any length of time, knows how quickly things change.
Thanks for setting me straight on that.
McCain=Scary
The Witch=Scarier
Uncle Jeremiah's Nephew Barry=Scariest
It makes me sad. If we win, we lose.
This is merely the quiet before the storm and McCain is stupidly doing nothing to win or encourage the conservative base.
Once the Democrat candidate is decided the biased MSM will viciously attack McCain to make up for lost time.
Conservatives are so dumb they don't even know how the RINOs do it.
If McCain wins with conservative support, that will be proof positive that being a Rino is a winning option and it will be repeated ad nauseam nationwide.
No Thanks!
That is simply not true. When I called to my GOP HQ in 2002 to volunteer, I was given doorhangers, but told to only focus on campainging for the most left-leaning statewide candidate and to ignore the gubernatorial and controller candidates. (who happened to be the most conservative). The local assemby candidate in '04 refused to come to any GOP event and refused to say whether he would vote for Bush. There are several other incidents I have experienced.
How about this: Lincoln Chafee publicy announced he would not vote for Bush in 2004. In 2006, Bush devoted more time and money to Chafee than any other candidate. I think it's almost the opposite of what you say.
Wish all of this were true, but it seem lying by Hillary, which is when she opens her mouth, and unpatriotism by Obama seems to be acceptable to the public according to the national polls.
The Cubans, backed by the Soviets, did just that in Grenada.
Reagan passed the test.
From what I read, it is attributed to Benjamin Disraeli, Mark Twain and many others.
Time for the Dems to go away, and a right-flank maneuver on the GOP by a third party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.