Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The same court with jurisdiction over legal name changes "may order a legal change of sex and enter a judgment indicating the change of sex of a person whose sex has been changed by surgical procedure."

Mutilating your body does not change your sex - no matter what the law, or some judge says.
Isn't your sex determined by your chromosomes?

1 posted on 03/27/2008 3:19:22 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj; wagglebee; neverdem; 2ndDivisionVet; ExTexasRedhead; Mister Politics; SandRat

WTF?????!!!!!!!!!


2 posted on 03/27/2008 3:20:45 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Those in the national Republican leadership do the work of three men- Moe, Larry, and Curly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7
"He" is not male. "He" is a mutilated woman, with seriously disturbing psychological problems.

If "his" blood or saliva were found at a crime scene, forensic testing would report that the sample belonged to a woman.

3 posted on 03/27/2008 3:21:30 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

for those who couldn’t find any grounds on which to propose that the laws of the land should forbid such nonsense...


4 posted on 03/27/2008 3:21:43 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Free New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

Ewwwww....just ewwww.


5 posted on 03/27/2008 3:22:32 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7
Man, that's going to be one screwed up kid.
7 posted on 03/27/2008 3:27:27 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

i’d bet you 100 pesos a judge would call him/her “sir”


9 posted on 03/27/2008 3:33:25 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

That story really makes a person nostalgic for the days when you determined what your gender was, just from looking at your body.

And, if you still didn’t know, or had some doubts, then you were just plain crazy.


11 posted on 03/27/2008 3:36:34 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7
Image hosted by Photobucket.com if IT is pregnant... IT is NOT a MAN!!!
12 posted on 03/27/2008 3:39:43 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

That is one strange tale.


13 posted on 03/27/2008 3:42:20 PM PDT by Radix (How come they call people "Morons" when they do not know as much? Shouldn't they be called "Lessons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7
The high-profile Bend case involves Thomas Beatie, who says he she was born female but identifies as a male.

There. Fixed it.

Why do the lamestream media identify a chromosomal woman as a he just because she had her boobs whacked off, took testosterone, grew a beard, and changed her name? Why do we play into their mentally deranged fantasies? And this person was so messed up, she couldn't even stick to the new gender she had picked, but decided to revert back to being a woman. And now with no boobs, a beard, and a man's name - she decided to become pregnant. This is sicker than even the usual transsexual. Some law needs to be written to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. At the very least, they shouldn't be legally called a male unless they give up their reproductive organs. Though I would prefer that we not feed into their derangements at all.

15 posted on 03/27/2008 3:46:54 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Obama wanted Terri to die. His "I am my sister's keeper" speech unfortunately didn't pertain to her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

The freak is a woman - however demented and pathetic.

IMO, the lawyers and legal types should be the ones getting screwed - nobody respects them in the morning (or any other time) anyway.


16 posted on 03/27/2008 3:46:58 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Don't cheer for Obama too hard - the krinton syndicate is moving back into the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

Yup, by the chromosomes. If at some future time a preternatually skilled surgeon of the sort inclined to perform the mutilations called ‘sex changes’ were to develop a technique for transplanting fully functional reproductive systems into people of the opposite sex, I could see a case for arguing otherwise.

As it is now, it’s just legal sophistry and mutilation aimed at abetting, rather than curing gender identity disorder (yup, it’s still in the DSM-VI, liberal agitation among psychiatrists notwithstanding). (Truth be told, it still would be even with my hypothetical surgical procedure, but that procedure would have a strong argument for actually living up to the name ‘sex change’.)


18 posted on 03/27/2008 3:49:17 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

And for those of you wondering what “it” looks like:

http://www.elsemanaldigital.com/articulos.asp?idarticulo=81192


19 posted on 03/27/2008 3:49:28 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (The fence is "absolutely not the answer" - Gov. Rick Perry (R, TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

It doesn’t make sense that someone who thinks they were born with the wrong equipment would want to go through something that is antithetical to being male. I guess her exscuse is that she wants a biological child, but she was apparently fine with not being related to the child of her “wife” if not for the fact that person cannot concieve, so why not adopt (although I doubt many Freepers would be on board with that lol). Furthermore, if carrying the child was just a means to an end, Beattie would do so as anonymously as possible so that she could resume life as the “normal” man she supposedly wants to be. Therefore I must conclude that she is an extremely confused attention seeker who just wants to defy societal conventions without regard to the effect on her child. Occasionally you run into these zero population growth liberals who think people who have their own kids are selfish. Wonder what they would say about this.


20 posted on 03/27/2008 3:51:46 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

There once was a queer from Khartoum who took a lesbian up to his room. They argued all night over who had the right to do what, and with which, and to whom!


23 posted on 03/27/2008 4:01:40 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

You are right. This is not a man. She is a disturbed woman who took male hormones and had her breasts removed.


27 posted on 03/27/2008 4:13:20 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; XR7
Beatie is not the first legal male to become pregnant

I had no idea! Here's another story from 2000; two lesbians decided to become gay "men." Apparently this "couple" didn't stay together for long. Wiki says the writer is controversial for advocating bestiality!

Family Values: Two Dads With a Difference—Neither of Us Was Born Male

28 posted on 03/27/2008 4:14:18 PM PDT by newzjunkey (http://www.friendsofsarah.com/ - CA Abortion Notification Petition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

Dear God,

Thanks for making me a Bull.

As always,

Your pal......


30 posted on 03/27/2008 4:18:41 PM PDT by Gator113 (Obama has "changed" me. I am now "a Typical White Person”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

You are right. This is not a man. She is a disturbed woman who took male hormones and had her breasts removed.


32 posted on 03/27/2008 4:20:18 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: XR7

Ugh! How about screwing up the child’s life with just more complications. Sheesh!


33 posted on 03/27/2008 4:37:57 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson