Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLICKING ON THE WRONG WEB SITE IS NOW A FEDERAL CRIME
UNDERNEWS ^ | March 20, 2008 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 03/24/2008 2:16:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-242 next last
To: tet68

Thought crimes.


81 posted on 03/24/2008 2:57:53 PM PDT by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If you (or your kids) look at porn sites, how can you be sure your haven’t downloaded a 17 1/2 year old or just slightly under aged “child”?

Remember the Tracy Lords incident? She made all kinds of porn while she was underaged. When she became legal, she announced to the world her real age making all the copies of her movies she had participated in “child porn”.


82 posted on 03/24/2008 2:58:29 PM PDT by A. Patriot (CZ 52's ROCK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

I am NOT clicking on that link, lol.

Seriously, I have been sitting here nice as can be at this computer and accidentally clicked on something or not, and had tons of porn ads pop up. It hasn’t happened in a while.

About 5 or 6 months ago, my computer got some kind of virus. My husband insisted it was because I went to weird sites or clicked on something. And I hadn’t. He was finally able to fix it :)


83 posted on 03/24/2008 2:58:50 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes

I’ve got at least two on wireless all the time, and on occasion one other. I’m not into child porn so I’m not going to worry about it. If someone is slipping in from the side, the materials will be on their computer, not mine.


84 posted on 03/24/2008 2:58:50 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: sand88
As a programmer, I can see where many innocent people will be "tricked" into going to these sites.

Yeah, pretty cool, eh? As programmers, with spoofing tactics and javascripts, we can arbitrarily send "innocent" people to prison with the click of a mouse.

85 posted on 03/24/2008 2:59:28 PM PDT by HAL9000 ("If someone who has access to the press says something over and over again, people believe it"- B.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

Well, now that you've taken your broad brush to label anyone who sees the inherent danger in this and where it can lead - as perverts = well, speechless.

You'd probably fit right in as a brown-shirted block boss. - (I can 'stereotype" too...

86 posted on 03/24/2008 3:00:24 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
Again, go to Professor Volokh’s blog. He explains how the program has safeguards built into it in order to prevent your hypothetical from happening.

you keep repeating going to this guys blog. I DON'T CARE about his reasoning. He is NOT GOD. Wow, so he has all these elegant, well reasoned statements about how "it cannot be abused." That's laughable. The real world is one of zealous prosecutors and over eager LEO abusing innocent citizens. This prof blog is absolutely irrelevant to how this FBI approach will be implemented. Tyranny is all around us and growing.

87 posted on 03/24/2008 3:00:55 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: devane617

This whole idea may be as effective as vice enforcement, which isn’t.


88 posted on 03/24/2008 3:00:57 PM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And the only reason you'd own a gun is because you want to kill people

good analogy

89 posted on 03/24/2008 3:02:31 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"I’ve got at least two on wireless all the time, and on occasion one other. I’m not into child porn so I’m not going to worry about it. If someone is slipping in from the side, the materials will be on their computer, not mine."

Yes, of course. However, if the Wireless network is Yours, the FBI will be knocking On YOUR door. Being that is where the trace will lead.

Imagine the fun as you explain away it all. What's that old saying about proving a negative?

90 posted on 03/24/2008 3:03:53 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Will the address show up to originate at this set-up,even though the stuff isn’t here.?

Retired , went fishing , lost track of what’s going on.But I ain’t complaining.Thanks,I’m going to study up on this,


91 posted on 03/24/2008 3:04:09 PM PDT by silentreignofheroes (Thank God for good directions,and turnip greens,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Assuming the user can read English, the user clicked either accidentally or intentionally. If accidental, there is no crime. If intentional, the user wanted to commit a crime. This is despicable. If the law prohibits attempting to commit certain crimes, then the attempt is indeed a crime. Now, how does the FBI prove the intention? [attempting requires intention]
Another thing they should think about. There are search engine spiders which electronically "click" on links. How will this be treated? is it possible to show that this happened? Is there any judge on earth who can understand what I just said?
92 posted on 03/24/2008 3:04:44 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (fascism in any form is wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

I couldn’t agree more, but there isn’t much I can do about it other than shut down my wireless. If a guy really wants to, he can probably hack the wireless and even access some of my computers. I wouldn’t know how to do it, but I do believe there are folks out there who do.


93 posted on 03/24/2008 3:06:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes

“Will the address show up to originate at this set-up,even though the stuff isn’t here.?”

Most home routers perform a NAT (network address translation) from the home network to the address assigned to you by your ISP. So when the gov traces it down, the last address they will get to is your home router, cable modem, or whatever you have.


94 posted on 03/24/2008 3:06:36 PM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Thanks,I feel real cozy inside now,


95 posted on 03/24/2008 3:07:15 PM PDT by silentreignofheroes (Thank God for good directions,and turnip greens,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Not only that but there is NO ACTUAL child PORN on the site so the prosecution is for intent? If I read the article correctly, the prosecution would be for the kiddie porn that they find on your computer by virtue of the search warrant they obtain based on the probable cause evidenced by your intent in accessing the fake kiddie porn site. Again, if I read it correctly, here is the scenario that would play out:

1. For whatever reason -- be it a google search or an email or some other stimulus -- you click on a link to one of these fake kiddie porn sites and attempt to download what purports to be kiddie porn files. You are somewhat disappointed to find that the files contain gibberish and no actual kiddie porn. You consider filing a complaint with the FCC for false advertising on the part of the website operator, but think better of it before actually visiting the FCC website.
2. While you were attempting to open the file you downloaded from the fake kiddie porn site, the FBI was identifying you by your ip address and preparing a search warrant based on your downloading of what you believed to be a file containing kiddie porn.
3. The warrant is approved and then the FBI visits your house and seizes your computer.
4. Upon finding actual kiddie porn on your computer via a search supported by a warrant, the FBI prepares an indictment for whatever statutes were violated when you stored actual kiddie porn on your computer (or whatever other files you might have on the computer that become evidence of some other crime).

Assuming the authorities do not find any actual illegal files on your computer, there would be no prosecution because no actual crime was committed even though the authorities believe one was attempted.

96 posted on 03/24/2008 3:08:30 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
OK your link title says: "Click here to see teenage boobs."

The link URL is: "http://www.democraticunderground.com/"

A harmless prank, but suppose somebody wrote a link title like: "Click here for good rates on car insurance" but the URL is a kiddie porn link. Bet the rent somebody does that and someone gets lured in and clicks without looking. It could be a forum post, an email, a webpage or any other place.

97 posted on 03/24/2008 3:08:34 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silentreignofheroes

It will show your address. I suspect that after the FBI runs into 95% false positives on this, they’ll have to wake up to the reality we’re already on to.


98 posted on 03/24/2008 3:08:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And the only reason you'd own a gun is because you want to kill people (hope that works) Excellent comment :) (and I'm assuming you don't mean that literally).
99 posted on 03/24/2008 3:09:08 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

[I]”As I understand it, they are not prosecuted for the click.

The click is used to get a search warrant. If actual child porn is then found, they are prosecuted for its possession. So presumably somebody who accidentally clicks on such a site but doesn’t actually have a collection of kiddie videos will be ok.

Unless they bring along their own stuff to “find.”[/I]

Not to mention the possibility that they come in shooting and kill some of your family members as they bash down your door at 3:00 AM.


100 posted on 03/24/2008 3:09:24 PM PDT by Pete98 (After his defeat by the Son of God, Satan changed his name to Allah and started over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson