Obama’s Mentor Wright -- Not “Typical” Racist (vanity)

[STE=Q]

Obama’s Mentor Wright -- Not “Typical” Racist (vanity)

Reverend Wright -- Senator Obama’s avowed mentor -- is not your “typical” racist.

He’s an Afro-centric racist!

Think “killer” Africanized bees vs. your everyday “typical” honey bee.

Both can sting, but the Africanized killers bees are far more likely to attack than typical normal bees.

Bees are interesting in that when they sting… they die!

Like the strap-a-bomb-on terrorists that kill others by blowing themselves up!

Apparently, the Africanized bees are far more likely to become martyrs for the colony than normal bees.

Perhaps Africanized bees are more noble than normal bees.

On the other hand, maybe the Afro-bees just have a really bad attitude!

But I digress.

Working under the supervision of The Trinity United Church of Christ, Reverend Jeremiah Wright has been inculcating a virulent theology -- called “black theology” -- to his parishioners for over thirty five years.

Obama admits to being a congregant at Trinity and to have, personally, received spiritual guidance from Reverend Wright for a period of seventeen years.

I think it would be safe to say that much of the guidance and “spiritual” instruction that Reverend Wright imparted to Obama was most likely drawn from the well of black theology.

James cone -- a progenitor of black theology -- writes:

"Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love."

Now, many have rightly interpreted such statements as racist, but they are much more than that:

THEY ARE STATEMENTS THAT CALL FOR GENICID!

Racism, the idea that one race is superior to another, is common and even excepted in some cultures: Sometimes even by those deemed to be inferior!

In the United States racism is not illegal.

If a Black person considers himself superior to me because I am a white man, he may be a racist, but he has not violated my rights under the law.

If, because I am white, he refuses to rent me a hotel room, he is both a racist and in violation of the law.

However, if he conspires to systematically destroy whites as a racial group, he is then contemplating the most heinous crime ever perpetuated by man -- genocide!

Genocide, according to Merriam Webster dictionary, is “ the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.”

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genocide

Now lets look at some of these statements of ‘black liberation theology’ more closely.

“IF GOD IS NOT FOR US AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE, THEN HE IS A MURDERER, AND WE HAD BETTER KILL HIM .

“BLACK THEOLOGY WILL ACCEPT ONLY THE LOVE OF GOD WHICH PERTICIPATES IN THE DESTRUCTION OF THE WHITE ENEMY”

… “WHICH IS THE POWER OF BLACK PEOPLE TO DESTROY THEIR OPPRESSERS HERE AND NOW BY ANY MEANS (ANY?) AT THEIR DISPOSAL (EMPHASES MINE)

First: God must be on the side of blacks against WHITE people.

Second: We (our black theology) will only accept the love of a god which participates (helps us) in the DESTRUCTION of the WHITE enemy.

Third: Which is the power to of black people to DESTROY their oppressors (WHITE people) by any means at their disposal.

Now lets look at some of the key criterion in the definition of genocide.

“The deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.”

It is deliberate and systematic, in that a “black theology” has been constructed that both instructs and demands -- by its own definition! -- the destruction of white people, by ANY means!

I am NOT saying that genocide has begun (yet), only that black theology seems to provide not only a “rational” for it: but a call for action … by any means!

Now, I am not a scholar or “expert” on black theology, but do we want anybody even close to the white house -- let alone IN the white house -- that attended Reverend Wright’s sermons at trinity church for seventeen years?

A church that supports a “theology” that petitions God to help kill their fellow countrymen?

What ever happened to the admonition of the Master to love thy neighbor as thyself?

In view of Reverend Wright’s background in ‘black theology’ his outburst after 911 of “G*D D*M America” doesn’t make complete sense.

After all, black people are also Americans… right?

Why would he dam black people?

Trinity Church has claimed that Reverend Wright’s statements were ‘taken out of context.’

I agree!

The “context” they are talking about is black theology!

What the reverend was really saying was “G*D D*M ‘WHITE’ America!”

So what did Obama learn from his pastor over a seventeen year period?

I don’t know about Obama but after my short encounter with his mentor’s black theology, it’s hard for me to get words like “by-ANY-means” and “destruction of the white enemy” out of my head.

Critics could say I’m changing the meaning by taking these words out of context.

Then again, like Thomas Sowell has suggested, we could demand that they please explain exactly what the words would mean when they are taken in context.

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell031808.php3

“by-ANY-means” … “destruction of the white enemy" …

I think we all know the answer.

[STE=Q]

LOL!

[zipper]

Yes, true but then John F’n Kerry is still there too...

I seem to remember in the US Senate race Obama’s opponent was unfortunate enough to have some controversial divorce information come out on him, just before the election, effectively derailing his campaign.

And in the state senate races before that, he cleverly had the other opponent’s petitions ruled invalid through scrutiny with a fine-toothed comb by his operatives... leaving him unopposed.

Still waiting on the rest of J F’n K’s medical records...

[bannie]

He obviously does not believe in God if he thinks he can control His existence with his “acceptance.” The whole thing is a word game to him, and he calls himself a “preacher.” Methinks he has just determined that a pulpit is a great place from which to control.

[Rudder]

Obama is nothing of a threat compared to Hillary.

[zipper]

I remembered correctly -- here are some excerpts of a Houston Press article well worth reading (though tedious -- the editor should've cut out much of it):

Obama hired fellow Harvard Law alum and election law expert Thomas Johnson to challenge the nominating petitions of four other candidates, including the popular incumbent, Alice Palmer, a liberal activist who had held the seat for several years, according to an April 2007 Chicago Tribune report.

Obama found enough flaws in the petition sheets — to appear on the ballot, candidates needed 757 signatures from registered voters living within the district — to knock off all the other Democratic contenders. He won the seat unopposed.

--------

and then this:

...in January 2003, Obama announced his bid for the U.S. Senate, where he cruised to victory thanks to the self-destruction of his top opponents in both the primary and general elections.

Obama joined a crowded field of seven candidates vying to fill an open Senate seat being vacated by retiring two-term incumbent Peter Fitzgerald. For months, he polled in the middle-of-the-pack behind frontrunner and former securities trader Blair Hull, who spent $30 million of his own fortune on the primary.

But Hull's campaign imploded just weeks before the election when his divorce files were unsealed, revealing an ex-wife's charges of verbal and physical abuse.

Obama unleashed a barrage of television ads just before the election, when the other candidates had largely depleted their war chests. He won the nomination with 53 percent of the vote.

In the general election, Obama squared off against another multimillionaire: Jack Ryan, who later dropped out of the race after a judge ordered his divorce files unsealed. The documents revealed that Ryan's ex-wife, actress Jeri Ryan, a former Miss Illinois best known for her role as Seven of Nine on Star Trek: Voyager, accused him of trying to coerce her to perform sex acts in public.

All from page four of the article "Obama and Me" in the Houston Press:

http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/4

[the invisib1e hand]

However, I suppose we can't get away with calling "Rev-Run" Wright a "WASP"... '-)

I like it! We live in an age where everything else is mixed up (since we unpegged from the meaning of "is"), why not metaphors?

[Eva]

Is this all Obama or does he have handlers?

[STE=Q]

“Obama worries me!”

He should!

The “Messianic” Obama needs to be taken down, and a stake driven through his heart.

He’s bad news for America!

So is Hillary and so is McCain for that matter... but we’ll cross those bridges when we come to them.

[TypeZoNegative]

This guy is worse than the Clintons.

[zipper]

If you read the entire Houston Press article (very long) he had at least one handler, meaning another politician who helped his career along by systematically making certain Obama got credit for certain legislation that would help him in an election (I presume that’s what you were asking).

[zipper]

This guy is worse than the Clintons.

That's a tough legacy to live up to, but given time he could do it -- he hasn't pardoned anyone yet, and there's no smoking dress we know of. Yet.

[lmr]

Great post!

[lmr]

The center-left and the fringers vying for power?

My latest youtube rant:

Barack Obama's "Quiet Riot" The Perfect Storm He Is Brewing.

[Defiant]

Jesse Jackson and his type of race pimps, at heart, just want white people to love them. Obama’s pastor just wants whitey dead.

[Defiant]

I remember when people said Clinton was done for in 1992 when a letter surfaced where he told a recruiter that he had pretended to want to enlist just to avoid getting drafted, and now that he had avoided the draft, he was not going to go into the army. He said he loathed the military.

That guy was running for commander in chief. And he won.

Don't underestimate the ability of the new millenium propagandists to fight against reality-based attacks.

[Eva]

I mean does he have someone behind him, like George Soros, kind of his own Mack Daddy, or did he come up with all this plan and all this ambition on his own? Maybe it is Wright who came up with the idea of pushing Obama as the new twofer (looks black/speaks white).

[Scarpetta]

"This horse is already dead."

Then don't click on the link and comment. Sheesh.

[Scarpetta]

McCain is pro-life.

[STE=Q]

“Don’t underestimate the ability of the new millenium propagandists to fight against reality-based attacks.”

Rule #1 in Battle, NEVER underestimate the enemy.

Also reminds me of the saying:

“something so very outlandish that only an intellectual would believe it!”

Should probably read ‘pseudo intellectual’.

Indeed, simple reality alludes them.