Posted on 03/19/2008 8:03:12 AM PDT by JulianaJohnson
Maybe his friend Oprah can hook him up with Dr. Phil?
After watching Sen. Barack Obama's major speech on race in America yesterday (read: Rev. Jeremiah Wright), I am convinced he is dissociative.
Webster's dictionary defines the psychological condition of dissociation as "the separation of whole segments of the personality or of discrete mental processes from the mainstream of consciousness or of behavior."
Obama's speech was thoughtful, history-rich, deftly composed, and, in parts, refreshingly candid about racial divides in America and the sources of those divides.
However, he spoke as if he was an innocent bystander to the history he recounted.
Obama discussed our nation's failings as though he was powerless to act previously or presently.
Obama lamented, "Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students."
That is true.
Although I would offer another notion that may help explain those achievement gaps. What about the cowardly politicians in the pockets of the teachers unions who pay lip service to education while they let generations of low income kids be forced into schools that they know will fail them?
That is what Obama did as a state senator representing Chicago's south side. And that helps explain why, when he left his state senate seat, there were more than 12,000 kids in failing schools in his district (according to the No Child Left Behind standards).
Obama had seven years in the Illinois General Assembly to do something about perhaps the worst urban public school system in America. He did nothing except propagate the status quo. It is Sen. Obama who has countenanced the pernicious philosophy of "separate but equal" for the children of low income families during his time in public life.
Obama called for white and black middle class Americans to focus on the "real culprits of the middle class squeeze" decrying a Washington that is "dominated by lobbyists and special interests."
Yet, as Illinois annually contends for the title of most politically corrupt state in America, what was Obama's record here?
Well, last week Obama appeared before the editorial boards of both Chicago daily newspapers to answer questions about his association with Tony Rezko, an influence-peddling, fundraising impresario who is under federal indictment for a variety of alleged pay-to-play schemes that involved shaking down companies that did business with the state of Illinois. In other words, illegal special interest politics.
Late last year Obama pegged the total amount of campaign contributions he had received from Rezko in the $50K range. Upon further review, Obama disclosed last week that the number is more like $250K.
Moreover, while Rezko was widely reported to be the subject of an ongoing federal probe in 2005, Obama transacted a hinky land deal with him that ultimately resulted in Obama purchasing a parcel of land from Rezko for about $300,000 less than the original asking price.
Obama now calls the land deal with Rezko a mistake.
Obama has also refused to take money from lobbyists and PACs--in his presidential campaign. That is a luxury he can now afford.
When it was not such a luxury regarding the financing of his campaigns in Illinois, Obama was not so doctrinaire, choosing instead the path of least resistance relative to "special interest" campaign cash. This is typical of how Obama cleverly dissociates himself from such previous unpleasantries, as if it was a failure of the system he wants to fix and not his personal choice.
Following the Obama editorial sit-down with the Chicago Tribune, columnist John Kass quoted Obama as saying, "I know that there are those, like John Kass, who would like me to decry Chicago politics more frequently. I'll leave that to his commentary..."
The implication of Obama's glib remark is that it is not his job to rail against rampant political corruption in Chicago and Illinois. That is a job for op-ed writers. When, in fact, that is precisely part the job, particularly in Illinois, of someone who seeks to be a leader in public life.
The operative word being "leader".
When Obama fails to venture into the fray, we are told that he is transcending politics as we know it. What it may instead be is a willingness to do the right thing amidst controversy or political danger only as a last resort.
And that brings us to good ole Uncle Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor and spiritual advisor.
Obama's answers to even the most basic, staple questions from the media about his relationship with Wright and his knowledge of Wright's views have clearly "evolved" over the last several days as the controversy went from percolating to boiling over.
I will leave the parsing of words to Obama and rather note the more general observation that, here again, for two decades Obama had the opportunity to go on the record, publicly or even privately (of which he has made no mention to date), and rebuke Jeremiah Wright's hate-filled spewage.
For two decades, Obama had the opportunity to open up the frank and rational discussion on race that he was forced to endeavor to facilitate yesterday in order to create space in the public's consciousness between Wright and him.
For two decades, Obama chose to instead go along to get along--with a radical, anti-American, bile-discharging "man of God", just as he did with the Chicago political machine bosses and their financiers.
Do I think Obama subscribes to the kooky conspiracy theories and overheated rhetoric of Jeremiah Wright? No, I do not. That is only my sense from those who know him well, however, because Obama certainly has not earned the benefit of the doubt on this score.
Going along to get along, not standing up when he knew better, has finally caught up with Barack Obama.
The consequence is that Obama will not be able to dissociate from this political reality: his 35-minute treatise on race relations in America will quickly evaporate into the ether whereas the videos of Rev. Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright's fire-breathing denunciations of the "U.S. of KKK A" are hermetically sealed to his candidacy.
Good post.
Bump!
Obama’s definition of “change” = “change from guy who’s there now to me, and I’ll bring the government gravy to my supporters.” Yeah, that’s a refreshing change.
Obama supported Alderman Dorothy Tillman in her last attempt to be re-elected, even though
Dorothy Tillman is a
corrupt,
gun-grabbing,
gun-brandishing,
reparations-demanding,
racist
Obama!...You Sir, are toast!
Hillery will take care of this humble black? man when she convinces the Superdelegates that she is the one who can be elected the next democrat in the oval office. Obama’s Wright moment leaves him forever a 20-year-empty suit and his little children, in their most formative years hearing this anti-American rant, grow up two more angry Black Americans. Their angry Black Mother will never be our first lady.
I think Obama is psychologically crippled. If you read his books, he has lionized the father who deceived his mother and abandoned him as an infant. His father’s family wrote a racist letter to Obama’s maternal grandparents at the time of the “marriage, decrying the fact that the Obama blood would be sullied by a white woman. He apparently blames his white maternal family for his father’s abandonment and rejection.
He is drawn to Rezko, Wright, Axelrod becauae they are strong and angry men who are able to express it. Obama is extraordinarily angry, but is unable to express it. He cannot be president of the United States, because he sucks up to hate. He has a psychological need to be subservient to hate.
Let me be the first on this thread to say that Obama is a racist, an opportunist, and an arrogant person.
So he's the kind of creep that hangs out with bullies.
My diagonosis — flip-flopper!
In fact, Brit Hume was onto a lying loop that Obama spoke in this speech.
He said previously that he was NOT aware of Wright’s remarks. In this speech he said he WAS aware of Wright’s remarks.
He said previously that he was NOT in the pews when Wright made these remarks. In this speech he said he WAS in a pew when Wright made these remarks.
A big “Kerry” Oh-oh..............flip-flop.
Do you have a link to information abuot the racist letter Obama’s father’s family wrote?
Obama refers to it in Dreams of My Father as part of what his mother told him about his father. There are references to the letter in the Obama Files. the site is freedomsenemies.com. It is in his book.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.