Posted on 03/16/2008 12:41:03 PM PDT by SJackson
Dr. Laura Schlesinger has a penchant for inane and knee-jerk moralizing. But last week even she outdid herself, as she blamed Elliot Spitzer's long-suffering wife, Silda, for her husband's unfaithfulness with a prostitute.
Speaking on the Today show, Dr. Laura opined: "When the wife does not focus in on the needs and the feelings sexually, personally, to make him feel like a man, to make him feel like a success, to make him feel like our hero, he's very susceptible to the charm of some other woman making him feel what he needs. These days, women don't spend a lot of time thinking about how they can give their men what they need."
According to Dr. Laura's approach, these poor, neglected husbands have been pushed by their rebellious wives into being porn and sex addicts. How sad that in the wake of the Elliot Spitzer tragedy we get Dr. Laura's blame-the-victim drivel rather than an honest discussion on the downfall of the American Male.
Men today are cheating not because their wives do not love them, but because they do not love themselves; not because their wives are not caring, but because their perforated sense of self is immune to affection. Were their wives to shower them with all the love in the world, it would simply seep through the shards of their shattered egos.
Propelled to succeed by an all-encompassing fear of failure and thrown into a rat race without limit, the broken American male never feels like he is ever good enough and chooses destructive escapes to compensate.
Powerful men like Spitzer are especially susceptible to the irrational self-loathing that is increasingly affecting the American male. Whatever level of achievement he attains, it is never enough to quiet the inner demons that tell him he is worthless. A culture built on soulless success has raised a generation of men to believe they are anonymous unless they accumulate money or fame, with women being yet another prized possession that accrues to the alpha male.
TRAINED TO feel like they are important only through professional achievement, these men are clueless about being in a relationship. They know how to master rather than relate, how to conquer rather than open up, how to manipulate rather than connect.
For the man to whom power is an aphrodisiac, paying a woman for sex becomes an erotic thrill. And men with low self-esteem are profoundly susceptible to women who are not their wives.
The man who sees himself as a loser sees the woman dumb enough to marry him as a loser squared. His wife's affection, therefore, cannot make him feel like a winner. It is only the woman to whom he is not married, the one that has not been devalued through a merger with a failure, that can make him feel consequential. And a woman who is so desirable that a night with her can set you back thousands of dollars can make a guy feel like a million bucks.
Bill Clinton may have been the most powerful man in the world. But all that power could not inflate an ego so punctured that it sought significance in a liaison with an all-too-ordinary intern who understood the depth of his need to feel good about himself.
LAST WEEK in Los Angeles I debated my dear friend Dennis Prager, the brilliant radio host and public intellectual, on whether men or women are more responsible for the breakdown of the American family. I argued that broken men are undermining their families; Dennis claimed that the blame was equally shared.
Now Dennis has always been a mentor to me. But, come on! You have to be blind not to see that men are in crisis. They are three times more likely to cheat on a spouse, eight times more likely to abandon their children (how often do you hear of a dead-beat Mom?), commit 98 percent of all violent crimes, and stand a decent chance of becoming porn addicts.
Even if they overcome the porn, they usually end up sports and TV addicts, who spend, on average, three hours per day in front of the tube. And that's three hours where they are not helping with the dishes, putting the kids to sleep, or being with their wives.
Sex for men has become a game of mastery rather than intimacy. A shocking statistic from the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention, published providentially on the same day of the outbreak of the Spitzer scandal, showed that one in four female American teens has an STD. Millions of teenage boys are pushing girls to have sex well before their bodies are ready, and without any kind of protection. Sexual scandals among powerful men should likewise spur us to action.
THE SOLUTION is to set a new definition of success among American men that is dependent not on becoming the competent governor of a state, but on becoming the responsible head of a household. The great man is not only he who can balance state budgets but he who helps his children with their algebra. Not he who hits home runs, but he who runs home to be with his family. Not he who wins primaries, but he who makes his wife and his children primary.
In this political season, it is in vogue to believe that pulling a lever for a particular candidate will bring us the change we desire. But it is we who have to change. America is not wanting in talented senators and industrious politicians. Rather, it is wanting in loving husbands and devoted fathers.
In the final analysis, what the people of New York think of Elliot Spitzer is not nearly as important as what his wife and children think of him. Because you are not a success in life if the people who mean the most to you think the least of you.
Because I have studied the sociology of family extensively; and most cheaters have not given it a real go. One can only speak in generalities on this board. But I venture to say that the truly medical exceptions are in the vast minority. Most adultery situations are personality clashes, communications issues, or just plain ol' amorality about the impact of cheating within a relationship where fidelity was offered, promised or knowingly expected.
LOL!
Get a girkfriend Greg!
Funny finding you here! LOL!
Learning anything?
Bill should talk! Didn’t he recently settle a sexual harrasment suit against him, out of court?
Nah - just tryin’ to hep the guys become learn’t. ROTF!!
The feminist movement hasn’t helped men feel too good about themselves. After all, a woman needs a man as much as a fish needs a bicycle (LOL).
Just a random thought on a Sunday night....
It is as it is...that’s why there are so damn many of us.
I believe she was devastated. You don’t know here so quit the judging. That was no act. I know, I’ve been there, done that.
They show disrespect for men. Probably written by lesbians.
Wow, I can’t believe I am going to say this, but your silly post actually illustrates what Dr. Laura was talking about. The concept that men have needs is foreign to you.
That said, I think Dr. Laura is FOS on this one. Eliot Spitzer was a power mad lunatic.
Yeah, probably kinky sex.
She said she wasn’t talking about Spitzer because she doesn’t know him.
Sweden banned prostitution due to the demands of the Lesbo feminists who claimed that voluntary prostitution “degraded” women.
I agree with all that you said in response to “Why would any real man need a woman to stroke his ego?” And I am a woman.
I think it is really a crime in our culture to see the extent to which men are disdained by women in general and show major disrespect by their wives. I am sick of it. So many women complain about how their husbands do not take the time to learn the wife’s needs, yet there are precious few who understand how important it is to a man to be admired and respected by his wife.
Wish I could figure out how to do the thing with posting what the other poster said.
***
Just do the same as you can do in a Word doc: Highlight and C & V.
Let’s see... according to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Schlessinger#Controversies
* Dr Laura had an affair with and posed nude for Bill Ballance while she was married to her first husband.
* Then she lied and said the pictures weren’t of her.
* When it turned out that lie wouldn’t work she tried to claim copyright.
* And when none of that worked, she finally admitted that they were of her.
* And she broke up the marriage of the man who would become her second husband. He left his wife and family for her.
* And she bore a child out of wedlock.
* And her mother died alone and wasn’t found for months.
So we should listen to her or accept her opinion on anything at all ever why, exactly?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.