Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Alan Keyes Bolt The GOP? (possible Constitution Party run)
Radar Online (New York) ^ | March 7, 2008 | Nick Curran

Posted on 03/07/2008 11:58:49 PM PST by Kurt Evans

Presidential candidate Alan Keyes may be leaving the GOP. In a conference call last night, Keyes is said to have told supporters that staying in the Republican Party would be "an occasion of sin" and he's ready to bolt. Keyes ... reportedly wants no part in selecting the "type of deodorant we need to make a stinking candidate acceptable to conservatives." A Keyes supporter confirms to Radar that the former Reagan administration official "stated in the conference call that he could no longer remain in the Republican Party."

As for what's next, a third party bid seems like a good bet. Keyes hinted at the possibility on a radio program in January, and an e-mail sent out by the campaign after last night's conference call ... included a link for supporters who "want to vote for Alan as your 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice on the Constitution Party presidential poll." A Keyes message board commenter who claims to have been on the conference call last night said regarding the possibility of a Constitution Party run that, "Alan asked us to pray about it." ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; alankeyes; alternative; backlash; conservatism; constitutionparty; founders; foundingfathers; gop; illinois; johnmccain; keyes; minorparties; nobama; obamasama; osamabama; prophetjeremiah; revolt; screwmccain; spoiler; thirdparty; truechoice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-226 next last
To: roamer_1
Creating the need for Keyes to go there at all.

There was no need for Keyes to go there. He was an oportunistic carpetbagger who's ego got the better of him.

121 posted on 03/08/2008 6:28:40 AM PST by Soliton (McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

Neither. I do know that both will do amnesty, which will finish this country as we know it.


122 posted on 03/08/2008 6:29:23 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans
> Keyes ... "could no longer remain in the Republican Party."

Back in the 1990s, I would have said (of leaving the GOP) that it was a futile, wasted gesture.

Nowadays, I am wondering how long it will be until I do the same thing.

123 posted on 03/08/2008 6:30:45 AM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

And for all those McCain naysayers - this election isn’t about McCain v Obamilary it is about who gets to put four new Justices on the USSC.


All the naysayers, party jumpers, etc can do as they please as it’s their right but the truth it is will come down to one of two people as president, either the democratic or republican candidate. Because of that I’m voting for the Republican because I think he will do the following two things better than a Democrat.

a] Nominate a more conservative person for the SCOTUS

b] Support our military men and women


124 posted on 03/08/2008 6:35:22 AM PST by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

This is what I’ve felt the need to be doing the past few elections. Dole, W, W again. I couldn’t take it anymore. My vote has and will continue to be a vote of conscience—and message. I will look for/pray for conservatives to make their way into Congress and LEGISLATE conservative principles. I will expect that they (elected conservative LEGISLATORS) will provide the loyal (to the CONSTITUTION) opposition to any measures put forth by the elected figurehead (president) that fly in the face of national security, national sovereignty, CONSTITUTIONally mandated freedoms and protections, or that threaten to move us (further) away from these.

I realize that Keyes can’t win. I realize, too, that America can’t win with any of the current choices. Something else I’m beginning to realize is that our country is inundated, INNUNDATED, with individuals who seem bent on fleeing the field of battle, looking to the government for a piece of the American dream, seeking to have all responsibility lifted off of their stooped shoulders because they haven’t the stomach for LIVING life as FREE men and women. These folks are everywhere. They are weak. They are fools. They want us to come off the battlefield in the Middle East because they fear reprisals. They don’t understand the reality (that reprisals have not come SINCE we’ve joined the battle.) They want this and that taken care of by the government. They fail to grasp that all of the THIS AND THAT comes with mighty long, costly strings that actually strangle the very freedoms we’ve historically enjoyed in America. Their soft hearts long for the ideals of peace, unity, love, equality but their dull minds fail to grasp that these come by sacrifice, duty, responsiblity and sometimes the shedding of blood. And these folks are everywhere (John Edwards’ 2 Americas). Each of the remaining candidates will, in their own way, take us further along this path, create more of this type of American (be they legal or illegal) and create what is fast becoming a steeper descent toward the end of our nation, our nation’s sovereignty, our precious freedom.

So, my vote for Keyes is to express to both parties that I detest you. I loathe what you stand for (Democrat) and what you are coming to stand for (Republican). I find you to be what is wrong with our country on so many levels. You are betraying the trust you were granted when you were elected. You have shown me that you are not up to the challenge. You have shown me that you have failed the American people. At this critical time, I am willing to send out this message because, while we may suffer further in the near future (under the guidance of whoever is elected in November), I believe that that bit of suffering may (I said MAY) not be fatal. There may still be an America left when you set forth your programs of socialism, communism, liberalism. Yes, I believe that there still may be time to bring some of my fellow countrymen back to their senses (when they see how you’ve messed it up.) And maybe, just maybe, in 2012 we will see a realization by just enough Americans that the only hope left for this country is for America to follow the path of the principles that brought us to the place of greatness where we were once the envy of the world. This, to my thinking, is what the conservative faces in this election.


125 posted on 03/08/2008 6:36:06 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

I don’t think you understand politics. I don’t think Mr. Keyes does either. Debates are not a university intellectual exercise, they are a means to gain votes. Keyes has never done a good job of that.


126 posted on 03/08/2008 6:38:57 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: Kurt Evans

I could get on board with a McCain-Keyes ticket, absolutely.


128 posted on 03/08/2008 6:40:16 AM PST by Terpfen (Romney's loss in Florida is STILL a catastrophe. Hello, McCandidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Are they happy with their choices? Around here they aren’t.

Around here there would have been a lot of folks unhappy about whoever got nominated!

I never saw so many complaints about so many candidates in my life.

Some people just enjoy being unhappy.

Are you one of them?

129 posted on 03/08/2008 6:43:49 AM PST by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

If Keyes does this, it would be nothing but a self-centered vanity run.

I am constantly amazed at how self-centered we have become. Way too many of us act like little kids who take their marbles home and pout if everybody won’t play by their rules.

That’s not how it works in a democratic society, folks. People who want to live in freedom and peace learn to get along, to compromise, to listen to the other guy even when he’s dead wrong.

Sometimes your guy or your ideas just don’t resonate with all your countrymen. And when that happens, you need to play nice and work for the next-best. This is not a perfect world.

In the primaries, a vanity run to get your ideas heard is appropriate. Ron Paul is an example — goofy but interesting. Alan Keyes needs to find another outlet for his views, because messing with this election is pure selfishness.

In the general election, a vanity run would only siphon a few votes, but in a close election could put Hillary or Obama in the White House.


130 posted on 03/08/2008 6:44:26 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billva

Are you going to ask this of each of the “...so many...” who complained about the candidates? Or is it maybe that the “...so many...” are on to something.


131 posted on 03/08/2008 6:47:08 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: MarDav
You make a lot of good points. I would vote for GB again if he could run though. As stubborn as he has been on immigration, none of the ones running can hold a candle to him.
132 posted on 03/08/2008 6:47:20 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

Abolishing the Electoral College would be a Constitutional matter...therefore legislative and outside of the domain of any President.


133 posted on 03/08/2008 6:48:26 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans; P-Marlowe; Jim Robinson

If Alan Keyes runs with the Constitution Party, my conscience will allow me to vote for him IF John McCain does not pick an acknowledged, significant, viable, CONSERVATIVE VP running mate.


134 posted on 03/08/2008 6:48:47 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

“Who do you want doing that McCain or Obamiliary?”

Would I prefer more David Souters to more Ruth Ginsburgs? I don’t think that’s much of a choice.


135 posted on 03/08/2008 6:49:50 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: GadareneDemoniac

Peter Fitzgerald had held the seat Keyes ran for.


136 posted on 03/08/2008 6:53:23 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: billva

Actually I’m an optimist and one of those dreaded Evangelicals that the party is so upset with. You know, the ones that aren’t afraid to vote their conscience because , they believe the Lord has a plan and will put who he wants in office.


137 posted on 03/08/2008 6:54:32 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If he were the CP nominee, and were on enough state ballots in the US to significant enough theoretical electoral votes to capture the Presidency, and despite his polling numbers, I have to admit that I would indeed vote for him as the LEAST of THREE EVILS: McCAIN, CLINTON or KEYES.


138 posted on 03/08/2008 7:12:02 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (The GOP serves a huge cr*p sandwich every 4 years to Conservatives, & sez "shut up!, no choice!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
Your phony "freedom vote" will give us Jamie Gorelick on the Supreme Court, the abolition of The Electoral College, a return to treating terrorism as a police matter, Socialized Medicine, the highest taxes the country will have ever seen and legalized partial-birth abortion on demand.

And which of these do you think McCain won't support, if it makes Kennedy and Liebermann invite him over for dinner, and the NYT shower him with praise?

139 posted on 03/08/2008 7:20:33 AM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard work to be cynical enough in this age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

How do you fit Ronald Reagan’s defection from the Democrat party into your reasoning?


140 posted on 03/08/2008 7:21:28 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson