Posted on 02/29/2008 1:42:09 PM PST by blam
Gene Expression Differences Between Europeans And Africans Affect Response To Drugs, Infections
ScienceDaily (Feb. 29, 2008) Differences in gene expression levels between people of European versus African ancestry can affect how each group responds to certain drugs or fights off specific infections, report researchers from the University of Chicago Medical Center and the Expression Research Laboratory at Affymetrix Inc. of Santa Clara, CA.
Researchers used Affymetrix exon arrays to show that expression levels for nearly five percent of the 9,156 human genes they studied varied significantly between individuals of European and African ancestry. The research team took an unbiased whole genome approach and found significant differences in several unrelated processes, especially among genes involved in producing antibodies to potential microbial invaders.
The researchers used lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from blood from 180 healthy individuals. They studied 60 nuclear families, including mother, father and child. Thirty of the families were Caucasians from Utah and 30 were Yorubans from Ibadan, Nigeria.
"Our primary interest is the genes that regulate how people respond to medicines, such as cancer chemotherapy," said cancer specialist Eileen Dolan, PhD, professor of medicine at the University of Chicago and senior author of the study. "We want to understand why different populations experience different degrees of toxicity when taking certain drugs and learn how to predict who might be most at risk for drug side effects."
But in the process they saw several other differences. Some, including variation in the immune system's response to microbial invaders, were expected. Previous studies have found that African Americans may be more susceptible than Caucasians to infection by certain bacteria, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis that causes periodontitis.
Others were unanticipated, including significant differences in expression levels among genes involved in fundamental cellular processes such as ribosomal biogenesis, transfer RNA processing, and Notch-signaling--part of a complex system of communication that governs basic cellular activities and coordinates cell actions.
"Population differences in gene expression have only recently begun to be investigated," said Dolan, "We believe they play a significant role in susceptibility to disease and in regulating drug response. Our current research focuses on how these genetic and expression differences play a role in sensitivity to adverse effects associated with chemotherapy."
Understanding at the genetic level how individuals within and among populations vary in their response to drugs could improve treatment. The University of Chicago team worked closely with Affymetrix on new technology that enabled them to perform a very comprehensive study including evaluation of expression levels of every known gene.
This research appears in the March 7, 2008, print issue of American Journal of Human Genetics, and is published early online. The National Institutes of Health funded the study through a grant to the Pharmacogenetics of Anticancer Agents Research Group. Additional authors of the paper include Wei Zhang, Shiwei Duan, Emily O. Kistner, Wasim K. Bleibel, R. Stephanie Huang and Nancy J. Cox from the University of Chicago Medical Center and Tyson A. Clark, Tina X. Chen, Anthony C. Schweitzer and John E. Blume from Affymetrix.
Adapted from materials provided by University of Chicago Medical Center, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
I know, I know....follow the money.
The same mutation that is responsible for sickle cell disease also confers resistance to malaria, which made Africans more desireable than European indentured servants, as far as working on the indigo and rice plantations of the coastal southeast. This effect, if not its cause, was known at the time, that the “Irish” tended to sicken and die from that sort of work, while the Africans did not. Prior to this point, African slaves were regarded as exotic, something of a status symbol. So, it can be said that this varying response to disease exposure led to the large scale African slave trade. Before the 1680’s, those in bondage on the North American continent were overwhelmingly European.
Accepting the article as accurate; science is just the facts. Biological differences do not imply racial superiority. But...it certainly complicates medicine, especially in the racially, ethnically polymorphous USA where most Americans are a rouge's mix.
Everyone outside Africa is closer related to themselves than they are to anyone inside Africa. (Less differences between Asians-Europeans)
The earlier separation between the non-straight haired and the straight haired people occurred anywhere from 75,000 to 100,000 years ago.
That means the genetic differences between the white folk and the Chinese are less than the differences between the white folk and the Africans, or the Chinese and the Africans.
The Indians and Chinese are probably already studying these differences in the hopes of making next generation drugs. They’re not as hampered by publish and perish or patent law.
PubMed wasn't working. I went to the source and BINGO! It's a FReebie, the complete article.
Yup. They're not burdened by pretending that we're all the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.