Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: McCain's Birthplace in Canal Zone Raises Eligibility Questions...
Drudge ^

Posted on 02/27/2008 6:12:38 PM PST by Kay Ludlow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 621-629 next last
To: Kay Ludlow

So GOP superdelegates get to pick the nominee? /s


101 posted on 02/27/2008 6:34:37 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Hillary Clinton - It's OBAMAS Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative
"Panama was AMERICAN TERRITORY at the time."

No, it wasn't.

102 posted on 02/27/2008 6:34:39 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Was Hawaii a state when Obama was born?

Yes...they were onboard way before he was born.

103 posted on 02/27/2008 6:34:40 PM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: steve86
Was McCrain around at the time of the "Adoption of this Constitution"?

I've heard rumors that's one of his qualifications - and why we'll have to trust HIM on original intent ;-)

104 posted on 02/27/2008 6:34:53 PM PST by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
No, they are just beginning the death of a thousand cuts against McCain as they did Dole. Little bits and pieces will stick. One person will remember the influence peddling, another will remember he might be cheating to get in. By the time the election rolls around, McCain will be corrupt/stupid/ineligible in enough people’s minds to remove any chance he has of pulling a miracle and winning.

Everyone was behind Dole, Mcnuts is a traitor to republican party.

105 posted on 02/27/2008 6:34:55 PM PST by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Damn funny.


106 posted on 02/27/2008 6:35:00 PM PST by bleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow
This is the ultimate type of desperation.
107 posted on 02/27/2008 6:35:10 PM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

Interesting. What are their thoughts on anchor babies?


108 posted on 02/27/2008 6:35:35 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow
McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out - New York Times
109 posted on 02/27/2008 6:35:44 PM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Here is their possible argument for what it is worth.

All persons born in the United States, except those not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. government (such as children of foreign diplomats) are citizens by birth under the Fourteenth Amendment. There is some debate over whether other persons with citizenship can also be considered citizens by birth, or whether they should all be considered to be “naturalized”. Current US statutes define certain individuals born overseas as “citizens at birth,” as opposed to citizens by birth.[4] One side of the argument interprets the Constitution as meaning that a person either is born in the United States or is a naturalized citizen. According to this view, in order to be a “natural born citizen,” a person must be born in the United States; otherwise, he is a citizen “by law” and is therefore “naturalized.”[5] Current State Department policy reads: “Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.”


110 posted on 02/27/2008 6:35:51 PM PST by BushCountry (They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

His parents were American citizens. The NYT is making fools of themselves with this.

On a side note, even the children born to US defectors in North Korea are technically US citizens because their fathers were American citizens. Some of those children (now adults) are known to still be living there.


111 posted on 02/27/2008 6:35:52 PM PST by Aglooka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Maybe the NYT thinks that because they regularly read posts from long time FReepers who are dissing McCain even more than they are.........

As for me, he has my vote. Like Dennis Miller says, he’s the only one willing to go after the bad guys.


112 posted on 02/27/2008 6:36:01 PM PST by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

Wasn’t it a US military base? If so, then it was US property. If a question about being born in the US, then perhaps Goldwater being born in Arizona before it was a state is closer .... NYT - one of these days they’ll run out of trees ....


113 posted on 02/27/2008 6:36:40 PM PST by SkyDancer ("There is no distinctly Native American criminal class...save Congress - Mark Twain")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution

"Was McCain around at the time of the "Adoption of this Constitution"?

No. But in that case, by your reasoning, he isn't even a ciizen at all unless he undergoes naturalization. Then again, maybe there's a reason he's so sympathetic to illegal--LOL

114 posted on 02/27/2008 6:37:05 PM PST by cookcounty (Obama reach across the aisle? He's so far to the left, he'll need a roadmap to FIND the aisle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow; Admin Moderator

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us/politics/28mccain.html?ref=politics

Here’s the article in the Slimes.


115 posted on 02/27/2008 6:37:07 PM PST by rock_lobsta (I Love Global Warming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

Canal zone? Is this about Vicki Iseman again?? :)


116 posted on 02/27/2008 6:37:21 PM PST by KingSnorky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto
My history teacher explained it differently. According to him, the requirement is that the president be born in this country.

Your history teacher is incorrect. But it is a common misperception. The Constitution refers to "natural born citizen" not "native born citizen" as some history texts report it.

117 posted on 02/27/2008 6:37:53 PM PST by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

This question has come up recently on FR, maybe a week ago and some excellent points were made. McCain is a United States Citizen, he derived citizenship from his parents, not from being born in a US territory or military base, but that may be different than “natural born” which has previously been defined.


118 posted on 02/27/2008 6:38:05 PM PST by rolling_stone (same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
Yes...they were onboard way before he was born.

I don't know if two years is "way before", but it was before.

You got me nervous there. Hawaii hasn't been a state for 50 years yet. You got me wondering just how young Obama was. (Still older than I am.)

119 posted on 02/27/2008 6:38:29 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Any Monday you can walk away from is a good one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow
They tried this on Goldwater in '64.  He was born in Arizona in 1909 and Arizona didn't become a state until Valentine's day 1912.  The constitution says "No person except a natural born Citizen" ... since he's never been anything but an American, and apparently he was born naturally, he's a natural born citizen.  Natural born doesn't mean he had to be in the geographical boundary of the U.S.
120 posted on 02/27/2008 6:39:05 PM PST by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 621-629 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson