Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sixty-Six Percent Say "Smear!" (NYT - McCain)
Captain's Quarters ^ | 2/27/08

Posted on 02/27/2008 1:39:34 PM PST by HD1200

Sixty-Six Percent Say 'Smear!' The Gray Lady's smear piece on John McCain got 66% of Rasmussen respondents believing that the paper deliberately trying to kneecap the Republican frontrunner. Only 22% think that the paper had clean motives in publishing the unsubstantiated gossip:

The Times recently became enmeshed in controversy over an article published concerning John McCain. Sixty-five percent (65%) of the nation’s likely voters say they have followed that story at least somewhat closely. Of those who followed the story, 66% believe it was an attempt by the paper to hurt the McCain campaign. Just 22% believe the Times was simply reporting the news. Republicans, by an 87% to 9% margin, believe the paper was trying to hurt McCain’s chances of winning the White House. Democrats are evenly divided.

(Excerpt) Read more at captainsquartersblog.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bimboeruption; iseman; mccain; nyt; smear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
POP POP!

Backfire!

1 posted on 02/27/2008 1:39:38 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Taken from a poll of registered voters likely to select J. Sydney McQueeg.


2 posted on 02/27/2008 1:44:15 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

When are you and the other guy on FR that doesn’t like McCain going to realize there is not a voting block large enough to elect a real Republican conservative at this time and that not voting for our nominee is sending a meaningless gesture to a party that doesn’t care because they already know this?


3 posted on 02/27/2008 1:48:17 PM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Now we have confirmation. 22 percent of the population are morons.


4 posted on 02/27/2008 1:50:52 PM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

No conservative ran (very hard) or is running now...


5 posted on 02/27/2008 1:56:31 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I think the blatant smear had no legs. If anything it helped Mcain!


6 posted on 02/27/2008 1:57:14 PM PST by omega4179 (vote against dhimmicrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

When are the rest of you going to realize you’re being DUPED?

This Party over Principle stuff is getting real old, fast.


7 posted on 02/27/2008 1:57:27 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

If the Times really wanted to “smear” McCain, they would have run the story back in December.


8 posted on 02/27/2008 1:58:00 PM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
"When are you and the other guy on FR that doesn’t like McCain going to realize there is not a voting block large enough to elect a real Republican conservative at this time and that not voting for our nominee is sending a meaningless gesture to a party that doesn’t care because they already know this?"

Probably after his mother kicks him out of her basement for his failure to launch...

9 posted on 02/27/2008 2:02:00 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

When are conservatives going to accept responsilibity for a dismal showing in the primaries?

I always thought Democrats were the party of crybabies who blamed others first.


10 posted on 02/27/2008 2:03:00 PM PST by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

“This Party over Principle stuff is getting real old, fast.”

Would you be willing to explain what options we have, then? Seriously, I’m not jabbing you, but I don’t see Hillary or Barack as options for us at this juncture. What else is left to us but McCain?


11 posted on 02/27/2008 2:03:06 PM PST by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
I guess I must be the other guy on FR that doesn’t like McCain. In my simple mind, it doesn’t make sense to vote for someone who has a disdain and abhorrence for my conservative principles and values.

It makes even less sense when the nominee will gut conservatives remaining within the GOP if he is elected and “reeducate” the rest. I can’t vote for someone sponsored by Soros.

12 posted on 02/27/2008 2:04:53 PM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
When are the rest of you going to realize you’re being DUPED?

Nov 4th, 2008 around 7:00 pm EST for a very few. Most will be gnawing their arms off in fits of McCain inspired delusional rage.

13 posted on 02/27/2008 2:05:15 PM PST by TADSLOS ( McCain-Feingold: "Good for thee but not for me"- John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: avenir
“What else is left to us but McCain?”

Do you know how pathetic that sounds?

IMO, let the Libs have it for the next 4 yrs. (but, not without a large wall to climb) It will let the RNC know we are a force to be reckoned with and let America and the world see just how badly Socialism operates. Conservatism, expressed in it proper form by a proper candidate, will win out. McQueeg is not an option, he’s a mirror image.

14 posted on 02/27/2008 2:10:48 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

“When are conservatives going to accept responsilibity for a dismal showing in the primaries?”

When the RNC puts forth and supports a candidate who doesn’t get most of his votes from Dims, Mods and Indys.


15 posted on 02/27/2008 2:14:16 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

“Do you know how pathetic that sounds?”

I can imagine, but it would only be pathetic if I put my faith in politicians.

I do not.


16 posted on 02/27/2008 2:24:34 PM PST by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
Backfire!

Not even close.

The media knows it is held in low regards, yet it knows that if it says the same thing often enough, it's message gets through regardless of it's merits.

The NY Times will take it's lumps over this, but it and the rest of the media will keep dredging up story after story about McCain. Some will have more credibility that this one, others won't. However, it will persist in bringing McCain's integrity into question again and again, until people start believing that because of the number of the claims, that some of them must be true.

It took the media quite a while to turn public opinion against the war in Iraq, but they kept at it until they got even supporters of the war questioning if it was really worth it.

They are starting small. After all, the McCain hasn't been officially crowned the Republican nominee yet. However, this is just the beginning, and they will undoubtedly have a lot of stories with a lot more credibility than that one to pile on.

This was just testing the waters to measure the publics reaction.

17 posted on 02/27/2008 2:24:58 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
Only 22% think that the paper had clean motives in publishing the unsubstantiated gossip:

And those people are either stupid or they are lying liberals.

18 posted on 02/27/2008 2:25:26 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avenir

Yes, as aways, keep you faith in your Maker.


19 posted on 02/27/2008 2:26:41 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: avenir

Yes, as aways, keep your faith in your Maker.


20 posted on 02/27/2008 2:27:01 PM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson