Democrat Debate: Clinton Done, Obama Winner

ExileStreet ^ | 2/27/08 | John Mark Reynolds

[ParsifalCA]

Senator Clinton will never be president. Obama would be a fool to put her on a ticket and he is no fool.

Against a weak field, cleared out for her, she failed. She is a phenomenally weak campaigner who is exhausted by crowds and people. She is smart, perhaps having the most book smarts in the race, but she has not “people intelligence.”

To give just one example of her bad ear for the “people” side of debate: [more @ ExileStreet]

[Churchillspirit]

Well put.

[damper99]

It does not matter if she wins or loses from here on out. Obama can’t win enough delegates to lock it up by the convention. Why do you think she’s staying in? She knows that she can get enough super delegates and disputed delegates to seal the deal. She will be the nominee.

[cubreporter]

I heard where Ann Coulter said she would even campaign for hillary if necessary. Ann Coulter has gone over the edge.

[A CA Guy]

Hillary always felt her challengers would be token resistance.
She was not prepared and her unlikeability factors were always through the roof.

The people of America hate her as much if not more than her husband.

[cubreporter]

Thank you.

[Hoodat]

Speaking of talking points, I cringed when I heard Charlie Crist use the word ‘troubling’ yesterday. Why would a Republican ever utter that Dem word?

[Slump Tester]

No she hasn't. She's right. How can you vote for the guy who tried to sneak the amnesty bill through without ANY debate?

[hoe_cake]

Obama is a patriot?

Really?

I thought patriots were proud to wear the American flag... .

[steve-b]

The nomination belongs to me!! It was on my sister's feet when the house fell on her!!! IT'S MINE!!!!

[steve-b]

Also, I wouldn’t put it past her to covertly sabotage the Obama campaign in the general election — she might be able to try again in 2012 if McCain wins (especially if, given his age and health, he declines to seek re-election), but 2016 is just too long for her to wait.

[cubreporter]

Where in my post did I say I was voting for anyone?

[Sans-Culotte]

See Message # 5. Duh! You didn't really dis the article, though. I gathered from your post that you were in agreement with it (or more likely, the headline/synopsis), and threw in the remark about McCain without commenting on the thrust of the article. I was not responding to Bibchr, but to you. You cannot claim credit for questioning the writer when it was actually Bibchr who did.

[Southack]

"She is smart, perhaps having the most book smarts in the race, but she has not “people intelligence.” "

She flunked her first bar exam, Einstein.

[georgia peach]

I actually don’t see that the country is moving to the left.Bobby Jindal comes to mind and the huge failure of all those anti-war movies.
I wonder if the country is ready for a President Obama after 9-11.Won’t most Americans rather vote for a very known quantity,McCain ,rather than a shiny , new unknown?
Do most Americans really want their taxes raised and the armed forces decimated and Barak chatting with the Iranian President? I don’t think so.

[cfrels]

Why not??....

JUDGES on the supreme court who are appointed for LIFE! This will push the country over the edge, this is how the liberals can get what they can't get legislatively....thru the back door of the courts.....

[Slump Tester]

"...this is how the liberals can get what they can't get legislatively....thru the back door of the courts."

NEWS FLASH: RINO McCAIN IS A LIBERAL!

If you're counting on him to uphold conservative principles, you better look at his RINO history.

[lstanle]

"McCain would do well to center his campaign around the idea that Obama is “wonderfully wrong.”

"Wonderfully wrong for America"