[Swordfished]

What, still no answer? I didn’t get one either.

I believe there's a thread with over 2,000 replies where this issue has been argued ad nauseum.

[fetal heart beats by 21st day]

Arguing is not the same as exchanging factual information.

The duty of government is to defend innocent human life.

Obama claims there is some constitutional principle involved in looking the other way while innocent people, who are denied their constitutional rights to due process and equal protection, under American law, are starved to death via court order.

You asserted that you agree with Obama.

There is no such consitutional principle.

It is a deadly lie, and one which you may find yourself subjected to one day.

[dbehsman]

What, still no answer? I didn’t get one either.
I believe there's a thread with over 2,000 replies where this issue has been argued ad nauseum.

Yeah, that's just what I thought. A non-answer dodge. You deathbots got what you wanted to achieve. Enjoy your victory while it lasts.

[8mmMauser]

>>I believe there's a thread with over 2,000 replies where this issue has been argued ad nauseum.

I resemble that remark. Actually, we have had zillions of posts and Terri Dailies ever since this pro-life topic came to national prominence. You should check them out if you can control your nausea. Of course, we Terri's Listers are all core conservatives. How about you?

Is that the way you think, as you expressed here about your B.O.? If so, you must be getting lonesome because most of the rest have wandered into the bug zapper threads.