Arguing is not the same as exchanging factual information.
The duty of government is to defend innocent human life.
Obama claims there is some constitutional principle involved in looking the other way while innocent people, who are denied their constitutional rights to due process and equal protection, under American law, are starved to death via court order.
You asserted that you agree with Obama.
There is no such consitutional principle.
It is a deadly lie, and one which you may find yourself subjected to one day.
And they're doing a bang-up job of it aren't they?
Do you believe ‘defending innocent human life’ trumps the wishes of the spouse? What about the wishes of the human life in question? Is marriage a sacred contract or is it not?
Posters who were for Giuliani were ZOTTED. So, why is an OBAMA proponent not gotten the zot? OBAMA is pro-death, not moderate-death but pro-death.