Posted on 02/23/2008 6:38:35 PM PST by blam
Cleopatra's Cosmetics And Hammurabi's Heineken: Name Brands Far Predating Modern Capitalism
Egyptian perfume bottle. Could product branding have begun in ancient Egypt? (Credit: iStockphoto)
ScienceDaily (Feb. 19, 2008) From at least Bass Ale's red triangle--advertised as "the first registered trademark"--commodity brands have exerted a powerful hold over modern Western society. Marketers and critics alike have assumed that branding began in the West with the Industrial Revolution. But a pioneering new study in the February 2008 issue of Current Anthropology finds that attachment to brands far predates modern capitalism, and indeed modern Western society.
In "Prehistories of Commodity Branding," author David Wengrow challenges the widespread assumption that branding did not become an important force in social and economic life until the Industrial Revolution. Wengrow presents compelling evidence that labels on ancient containers, which have long been assumed to be simple identifiers, as well as practices surrounding the production and distribution of commodities, actually functioned as branding strategies. Furthermore, these strategies have deep cultural origins and cognitive foundations, beginning in the civilizations of Egypt and Iraq thousands of years ago.
Branding became necessary when large-scale economies started mass-producing commodities such as alcoholic drinks, cosmetics and textiles. Ancient societies not only imposed strict forms of quality control over these commodities, but as today they needed to convey value to the consumer. Wengrow finds that commodities in any complex, large society needs to pass through a "nexus of authenticity."
Through history, these have taken the form of "the bodies of the ancestral dead, the gods, heads of state, secular business gurus, media celebrities, or that core fetish of post-modernity, the body of the sovereign consumer citizen in the act of self-fashioning." Although capitalism and branding find in each other a perfect complement, they have distinct origins. Wengrow shows that branding has for millennia filled a deep-seated need for us humans to find value in the goods that we consume.
Sure to be provocative, "Prehistories of Commodity Branding" is necessary reading for a wide range of people, from those interested in the workings of ancient societies to anyone who is interested in understanding how marketing has developed into a powerful force in our lives.
Journal reference: Wengrow, David "Prehistories of Commodity Branding" Current Anthropology 49:1 .
Adapted from materials provided by University of Chicago Press Journals.
GGG Ping.
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. |
||
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Ann Coulter still wears Nerfertiti’s superwide carbon black eye liner
Garum (it turns out) wasn’t a brand name [blush]:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/wine/garum.html
LOL!
Eye liner included, there is nothing wide about Ms. Coulter (quick, someone go get the girl a samich...). Now Amy Winehouse...that is some serious (or series) eyeliner :)PaMom
Emperor’s Hummingbird’s tongues!
And why, (pray, tell) should us wimminses think we have “invented” make-up?
Had we come here (to Earth) before we realized men could be enticed, we night have had a few thousand years of “trial and error.”
However. It has all been handed down to us over the Millennia....
;o])
What?
Hummingbird tongues? How many of those little wuzzers did you have to kill to get enough for a meal? Or even an appetizer?
*sheesh*
Interesting read, thanks.
:’)
Note: this topic is from . Thanks blam. No ping, just ping message update.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.