Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/22/2008 10:43:54 AM PST by RatherBiased.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RatherBiased.com
"Even the Times's readers don't seem interested in this story. When you look at their "most emailed" stories of the day, the McCain hit piece doesn't even crack the top ten."

That's got to hurt!

2 posted on 02/22/2008 10:47:31 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

“anonymous sources” = “I made it up”


3 posted on 02/22/2008 10:49:37 AM PST by Redbob (WWJBD: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

4 posted on 02/22/2008 10:56:18 AM PST by frithguild (I hope for change when I give the Man my cash - but all I ever get is nickels and dimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

The MSM will continue to publish lies and half truths attacking any Republican without consequence. They are preaching to the choir who continually repeat their lies even if they know better. Lying and cheating in politics is perfectly acceptable to liberals.


5 posted on 02/22/2008 10:59:14 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

The NYT, as we know it today, must dry up and be driven out of business. I read that paper for more than 35 years during my commute into the city. Today, it’s fishwrap...run by a second rate family with a foolish, childish personal agenda. This piece on McCain ranks right up there with the one a couple of months ago that claimed Iraq and Afganistan vets were becoming crazed killers once they were back in civilian life. That story was debunked in less than 2 hours, showing that the homicide rate among those vets was one-fifth that of people in the same age bracket who had not served in harms way.


6 posted on 02/22/2008 10:59:27 AM PST by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

An anonymous source tells me that Obama eats children and that Hillary Clinton strangles kittens in her spare time.

Go ahead, you can’t prove they didn’t.


9 posted on 02/22/2008 11:31:47 AM PST by ClaudiusI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

I don’t think the DEMOCRATS even believed it!


10 posted on 02/22/2008 11:33:48 AM PST by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

Did the NY Slimes mention THIS

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56626

on Osama Obama? He has BIG problems.


11 posted on 02/22/2008 2:28:15 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com
["Conservative media critic Brent Bozell took a shot on the Fox News Channel, by saying that The New York Times is giving the National Enquirer a bad name."]

LOL! Good one!

["Some non-ideological critics focused on the failure to prove the affair, or the favoritism. -- Keller says that misses the point -- "I think the story that emerged is actually bigger, and more important and maybe more subtle," he says. "There's not a big market for subtle these days but I think it's an important story."]

"This story is true....even though the evidence had to be manufactured"

13 posted on 02/22/2008 6:06:41 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

The old gray whore is infertile..... her ovaries are toast.


15 posted on 02/22/2008 6:14:01 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com
...while network news broadcasts, liberal bloggers, and the general public are questioning the paper's journalistic standards.

No need to question the Times' journalistic standards - they speak quite clearly for themselves.

16 posted on 02/22/2008 6:18:38 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RatherBiased.com

The NYTimes has readers?


22 posted on 02/25/2008 1:43:16 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson