Skip to comments.
McCain Vs NY TIMES... Not a media darling anymore
NY Times ^
Posted on 02/21/2008 8:11:42 AM PST by swampdweller
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
The NY Times even endorsed McCain and now they are attacking him on a very thin story that they sat on since December. You wanna get a conservative angry and ready to fight...this will do it.
To: swampdweller
But...but...but, he’s a war hero.
To: swampdweller
The McCain story was on page one. Does anyone know on what page the Obama-Sinclair story ran and the length of each story?
3
posted on
02/21/2008 8:14:36 AM PST
by
tennteacher
(Hunter Conservative)
To: swampdweller
NEW YORK TIMES ENDORSED!!! (Bite me, Rinos. Enjoy the trap you walked into.)
4
posted on
02/21/2008 8:14:56 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(New York Times Endorsed!!!)
To: Uncle Miltie
live by the sword, die by the sword
5
posted on
02/21/2008 8:15:44 AM PST
by
CPT Clay
(Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW , Vote Hunter in the Primary)
To: swampdweller
That didn’t take long, did it? It should have been obvious that once McCain was the GOP nominee his fawning media supporters would turn on him in favor of the Democrats.
6
posted on
02/21/2008 8:16:57 AM PST
by
puroresu
(Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
To: All
In the “Fake but Accurate” arena, what do we know about these four “reporters”?
7
posted on
02/21/2008 8:18:27 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(BigEd)
To: swampdweller
Well we knew it was going to happen.
8
posted on
02/21/2008 8:19:24 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
To: swampdweller
The reason the NYTimes published this now is so they can publish the Obama-Larry Sinclair story soon without looking like paid lackeys for her royal bith clinton, so get ready for some real fun when that happens, ha ha ha.
9
posted on
02/21/2008 8:19:35 AM PST
by
Gothmog
(I fight for Xev)
To: swampdweller
The NY Times even endorsed McCain and now they are attacking him on a very thin story that they sat on since December. You wanna get a conservative angry and ready to fight...this will do it. A liberal newspaper attacks a moderate and often liberal Republican and as a conservative you're ready to fight? Doesn't compute.
To: All
It’s over. I’ll take O’Bama over McCain by 9% in the general election. This is only the beginning of the fun the media is going to have with McCain.
11
posted on
02/21/2008 8:20:42 AM PST
by
street_lawyer
(Truth is a defense and the best offense.)
To: All
More info- First name Jim Rutenberg speaking at Brown University... Annoying nasal voice...And he wears plaid shirts....
Link
12
posted on
02/21/2008 8:22:04 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(BigEd)
To: cripplecreek
Rush predicted this a month or so ago...
13
posted on
02/21/2008 8:22:26 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
To: swampdweller
This story will be soon archived in the “round file” along with George Bush’s alleged coke habit, the Mike Nifong slam dunk case against the Duke Lacross team, former Labor Secretary Ray Donovan’s alleged fraud, George Herbert Walker Bush’s alleged affair and Dan Rather’s CBS 60 Minutes hit piece on Bush’s air guard service! (meanwhile Juanita Broadrick’s rapist is a free man!)
14
posted on
02/21/2008 8:22:45 AM PST
by
meandog
(Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 320 and counting! Stay home and get Hillary!)
To: swampdweller

"I'm Dan Rather.
I live with the poo.
Here's The New York Times.
Look for it in here too." .
15
posted on
02/21/2008 8:23:07 AM PST
by
OESY
To: swampdweller
The NY Times even endorsed McCain and now they are attacking him on a very thin story that they sat on since December. But...but...but it was just wagging its tail a few minutes ago.
16
posted on
02/21/2008 8:23:09 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
To: swampdweller
Expedient way to get the emphasis off Hillary’s campaign collapse. In addition, it puts an early shot across the bow of the same candidate they endorsed when it was important to defeat conservatives.
If only McCain were to win and be as vindictive against the press as he was against the Bush Administration. There’s a good reason to vote for him.
17
posted on
02/21/2008 8:23:21 AM PST
by
Steamburg
(Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
To: street_lawyer
Its over. Ill take OBama over McCain by 9% in the general election. This is only the beginning of the fun the media is going to have with McCain. Such an assumption hardly matches your tag line!
18
posted on
02/21/2008 8:24:37 AM PST
by
meandog
(Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 320 and counting! Stay home and get Hillary!)
To: tennteacher
Who is this Sinclair fellow? </sarc>
19
posted on
02/21/2008 8:24:39 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: All
What a pack of vultures you people have become.
There is always the ‘female’ gossip story in every election and if McCain could handle his wife and another woman - at his age even eight years ago - I’d say he was a pretty healthy fella!
Of course it’s just a lame attempt at the usual junkfest and the Times has nothing else going - unless it’s Hillary and a girl!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson