Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Musharraf, pro-Taliban party routed in Pakistan's election
longwarjournal.org ^ | February 19, 2008 | Bill Roggio

Posted on 02/19/2008 3:14:49 PM PST by AFPhys

Pakistan has successfully held elections for the National Assembly and provincial governments, and President Pervez Musharraf and the pro-Taliban Muttahida Majlis-e-Amil, or MMA, have encountered major setbacks. Musharraf has lost his governing coalition, while the MMA lost most of its seats in the National Assembly as well as control of the Northwest Frontier Province. The Pakistan People's Party has won the majority of seats and will form the government, while the Pakistani Muslim League - Nawaz finished a close second. The Awami National Party also won a surprising victory.

Election Results

Election results are available for 240 of the 272 seats for the National Assembly, as well as for the four provincial assemblies. The PPP -- the party of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto -- is in the lead with 87 seats, followed by the PML-N, Nawaz Sharif's party, with 66 seats. The PPP is on track to form the governing coalition.

The PML-Q, the party of Musharraf's party, has won only 38 seats. The Muttahida Qaumi Movement (a student's movement based in Sindh province) won 19 seats and the Awami National Party (a secular Pashtun party) won 10. The MMA only won three seats. Thirty-five seats have been distributed to independents, while results are still being counted for 26 of the seats. Elections were postponed in four districts.

Winners and losers

Monday's elections had three clear winners and two losers. The Pakistan People's Party and Nawaz Sharif have come out on top in the elections, as did the little-known Awami National Party. President Musharraf and his party, and the MMA suffered clear defeats at the polls.

Musharraf’s political party, the Pakistani Muslim League-Quaid, encountered a major electoral defeat. The PML-Q won a majority and formed the government after the 2002 election, but has seen its political gains dissipated over the past six years. Musharraf's disbanding of the Supreme Court and the imposition of a state of emergency in October 2007 are seen the reason for his party's defeat. Musharraf disbanded the courts, declared a state of emergency, and rounded up political opposition to ensure his election as president was assured. Musharraf defied the constitution by running for president while serving as chief of staff of the military. Many of the PML-Q leaders, including party president Chaudhry Hussain and the former Speaker of the National Assembly Chaudhry Ameer Hussain lost their seats. The PML-Q does appear to be on track to govern in Baluchistan province.

The MMA also suffered a major political defeat both the national and provincial elections. The MMA has won only three seats in Pakistan's National Assembly and has lost control over the Northwest Frontier Province. Maualana Fazlur Rahman, the party's president, lost his seat in the national election. The MMA has facilitated the rise of the Taliban in the province and tribal areas by blocking military actions and pressing for negotiations. The MMA has also vocally opposed the US and NATO presence in Afghanistan and has stirred up protests during strikes against Taliban and al Qaeda training camps in the region.

The clear winner is the Pakistan People's Party as it will form the next government, appoint the Prime Minister, and will control the Sindh provincial government. The PPP was widely expected to win the election, but the outcome was by no means certain. The Dec. 27, 2007 assassination of Benazir Bhutto, the popular leader of the party, plunged the party into a leadership and identity crisis. The reins of the party were turned over to her husband Asif Ali Zardari, who has faced charges of corruption for embezzling $1.5 billion during Benazir's term as Prime Minister, and her 19-year-old son Bilawal Zardari, a student at Oxford. Aftab Ahmed Sherpao, the former Minister of the Interior and leader of the PPP-Sherpao also is a winner within the PPP. He won his seat in Charsadda, where the Taliban made two attempts on his life during 2007.

Nawaz Sharif and his party, the Pakistani Muslim League-Nawaz, were also expected to win big. The PML-N is poised to take second place in the National Assembly polling and will also control the provincial government of Punjab. While Sharif was not allowed to run for political office, he is exercising power through his party. Sharif has opposed military operations against the Taliban and has been accused of accepting bribe money from Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda.

The Awami National Party, with its 10 seats, may serve as an influential coalition partner with the PPP. The ANP will control the Northwest Frontier Province, and has stated it will ally with either the PPP or PML-N to form the provincial government. The ANP is a secular Pashtun party that is opposed to military action against the Taliban and promotes non-violent solutions. The Taliban conducted two major strikes against ANP offices in North Waziristan and Kurram the week before the election, killing and wounding scores of its members.

Security implications

Western watchers have closely followed the election in Pakistan as a transition to a democracy is seen as a key to fight the Taliban and al Qaeda insurgency which threatens to destabilize nuclear Pakistan and the wider region. Numerous attacks against the West and India have been hatched in al Qaeda training camps in the tribal areas. The US government hoped a coalition between Bhutto and Musharraf would provide the needed unity needed between the secular political class and the military to fight the rise of the Taliban and al Qaeda in northwestern Pakistan.

But these hopes were shattered when Musharraf declared a state of emergency and suspended the constitution in October 2007, then Bhutto's assassination at the end of December 2007. It is now unclear what action, if any, will be taken by the new Pakistani government. The PPP will need to align with one or more parties to form a government. A coalition with the PML-N makes action against the Taliban less likely as Sharif is opposed to military action. The PPP indicated is is ready to form a coalition with the PML-N, which may push for the impeachment of Musharraf. The MQM and ANP will also oppose military action against the Taliban. A coalition with the PML-N may be possible, but the PPP would face serious political backlash for aligning with the party blamed for the assassination of Bhutto and the usurping of the constitution.

And while the defeat of the MMA in the Northwest Frontier Province is a welcome development as the party has facilitated the rise of the Taliban by sponsoring peace deals, there is little reason to believe the ANP will fare better against the rise of extremism. The ANP's platform of non-violence and accommodation play directly into the hands of the Taliban, which seeks "peace" deals that give it time and space to consolidate power. Attacks on ANP political offices, such as the two that occurred just prior to the elections, may change this position over time, but time is on the Taliban's side.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhutto; musharraf; nawazsharif; pakistan; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
This seems to be a quite comprehensive and neutrally written news story.

I know little about this situation. I would appreciate input from those who are knowledgeable.

1 posted on 02/19/2008 3:14:51 PM PST by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I see you have a ping list for articles such as this. I would appreciate input from knowledgeable people on your list regarding this article.


2 posted on 02/19/2008 3:16:01 PM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Good News and bad news as “peace” with Taliban in the north will prove fruitless through negotiation it seems?


3 posted on 02/19/2008 3:43:06 PM PST by MEG33 (God Bless Our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
This place is a mine field. The culture and 28% approval of UBL can get anyone killed.
4 posted on 02/19/2008 4:21:35 PM PST by Domangart (editor and publisher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

“PML-N, Nawaz Sharif’s party, with 66 seats”

all the reports are placing this leader and his party as if they stand miles distant, in philosophy, from the taliban

they do not

the idea that they do is derived from their sales job and western ignorance


5 posted on 02/19/2008 4:34:04 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domangart
Um, try 4% in the north, and 1% nationally.

In this election, the religious party coalition that controlled the northern frontier was wiped out, and a secularist tribal party has taken over that region's parliament.

Nobody has a majority. If Sharif and the PPP worked together they could form a government, but no one has ever been able to work with Sharif in the past (he is a control freak who breaks every rule seeking absolute personal power). Instead the PPP is likely to make deals with scads of independents and form a left plus regionals government.

The part the western press still can't grok is that none of it is about Mushie, and instead his opponents now have to actually government. Since they don't agree on anything, this is an excellent recipe for democracy and realism, and not dangerous to anyone. Meanwhile, the voters have already seen to destroying the religious extremists, whose name is now mud.

6 posted on 02/19/2008 4:59:07 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Right, that is why Sharif abolished Friday holidays and all that. (s/c)

Sharif and Mushie, both, are heirs of the military-Islamic right, with Sharif representing a mercantile rich bloc and Mushie an army bloc within it. Both play Islamic legitimacy cards against the PPP as too secularist and western for Pakistan, but neither is terrorist-fundamentalist as the minor religious parties are.

More important, they are split, which is why the PPP is the largest party. The country isn't going to lurch violently right when (1) the violent right is hated by most of the country and (2) the center-right is split wide open about which specific leader should rule.

Which is all good. Division is the stuff democracy and moderation are made from. With a healthy dose of responsibility, and an inability to enact anything without others outside one's narrow circle of supporters.

7 posted on 02/19/2008 5:04:02 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

So this is really good news then?


8 posted on 02/19/2008 5:08:43 PM PST by westmichman ( God said: "They cry 'peace! peace!' but there is no peace. Jeremiah 6:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: westmichman
Of course. Pakistan had free democratic elections, and the far right nutjobs are entirely marginalized as a result.

This is what we've been working for since last fall. Naturally, we didn't want Bhutto killed along the way, she was supposed to be running her side of all this. But nobody profited by it - those who didn't want to face her winning an election still saw her party win it.

In case everybody forgot, the reason the terrorists murder people instead of just standing for election, is when there are free elections they flat lose.

9 posted on 02/19/2008 5:14:36 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Can American policies be credited here?
We could sure use some good press although they probably won’t report it as such.


10 posted on 02/19/2008 5:17:47 PM PST by westmichman ( God said: "They cry 'peace! peace!' but there is no peace. Jeremiah 6:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
“In this election, the religious party coalition that controlled the northern frontier was wiped out, and a secularist tribal party has taken over that region’s parliament.”

Which, in my opinion, will mean a possible civil war with the extremists, because they will say the election was stolen. The ruling party(s) will either fight a war in the north (which will mean terrorism in the south) or will try and accommodate the mullahs (bend over and grab the ankles) and write up a new power sharing scheme. The mullahs will then proceed with the rest of the take over and India will invade.

A real happy set of prospects. This is all my personal opinion and I hope I am wrong.

11 posted on 02/19/2008 5:22:13 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy (The United States Marines . The finest and most feared fighting force in the history of mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: westmichman
We asked Mushie to hold elections. He held elections. This ought to be reported as a purple fingers moment. Instead the media pretends that Bush wants Mushie to be dictator for life and that anyone in Pakistan supporting anyone else is a slap - it simply isn't.

We want a stable democratic and non-extremist Pakistan. We now see a democratic one, where last year there was a dictatorship. How can that not be a good thing?

Some people pretended democracy couldn't work there, if you let people vote they'd elect extremists. It was always poppycock. Extremists use violence not because they are popular but because they aren't. They got less than 5% of the vote and lost control of the only body they had in the country, the independent regional parliament of the northern frontier province.

If it doesn't fit the media's script of "everyone Bush likes is Hitler", they don't know what to say. Of course it is good news, that is why you see practically nothing about it. Just like Iraq and the war generally...

12 posted on 02/19/2008 5:25:27 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy
Except the beauty is not they won't be fighting any ruling party or any dictator. The northern parliament is now controlled by a secularist Pasthun tribal party. If the religious nuts want to throw their bombs at them, they can go ahead and try - it will just make their names mud with the whole Pashtun tribe.

Meanwhile their most popular line, attacking Mushie as supposedly a tool of the west, kind of loses its resonance when the PPP is in power, and it vastly more secularist and modernist than he is. Oh and is also unappeasably furious at them for murdering their sainted leader...

Believe me, the extremists of Pakistan are not happy tonight.

13 posted on 02/19/2008 5:29:01 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

BTTT
I really appreciate your knowledge of this.
I’m feeling really good because of this. Thanks,
WMM


14 posted on 02/19/2008 5:34:04 PM PST by westmichman ( God said: "They cry 'peace! peace!' but there is no peace. Jeremiah 6:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Thank you for your posts!


15 posted on 02/19/2008 6:35:08 PM PST by MEG33 (God Bless Our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000; maine-iac7; lancer; voletti; GOPJ; Tigen; AliVeritas; Grimmy; gonzo; ...
Pakistan ۋﮧ۱م

FReepmail if you want on or off
16 posted on 02/19/2008 6:58:23 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Even though Bhutto was a socialist, this proves once again that people long for Freedom.

Democracy is the invisible hand that moves people away for Tyrants. Thank you President Bush.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


17 posted on 02/19/2008 7:02:12 PM PST by bray (Go InSain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Um, try 4% in the north, and 1% nationally.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23094334/

"According to the poll results only 24 percent of Pakistanis approved of bin Laden when the survey was conducted last month, compared with 46 percent during a similar survey in August."
18 posted on 02/19/2008 7:04:24 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Great post and exactly what I suspected. The news about the Northern Pak is huge since it is the AQ hiding grounds. Didn’t even have to invade like Black Oblack wanted.

Pray for W and Our Troops


19 posted on 02/19/2008 7:04:50 PM PST by bray (Go InSain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

I should’ve added: if there’s a poll source more credible than the MSM from where you got the 4%/1% figures, let me know! I’ve heard around FR that his popularity fell to 24%-ish from about half, but if it’s actually much lower that’s great news.


20 posted on 02/19/2008 7:31:57 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson