Posted on 02/19/2008 11:46:19 AM PST by HD1200
We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.
We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at a undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert..
Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates
It’s no longer a porn site.
And wasn’t it Arlen Specter that said he would know porn when he saw it?
I thought the same thing as Antonius. I guess they switched from being a porn site last month.
Sorry, I meant to direct this comment to Antoninus.
Another possibility is it is just a trap. He is intentionally lying hoping the rightwing will run with attacks, and later he will be completely discredited. Then the Obama camp can point to this fraud when someone with some real goods on Obama comes forward.
Well put a reward out there for ANYONE ELSE who has had homosexual sex or done drugs with obama. Especially if they have pics.
Better watch out or Drudge will get there first.
They will say he passed the first test (leak) and then when it’s all done, they will say he failed the subsequent one. The idea is not to have proof, but to imply that anyone who agrees to take a polygraph must be telling the truth.
That is possible. I thought of that the first time I saw the video. I dismissed it after I listened to 2 long interviews. If he is lying, for whatever reason, he has fooled me. That does not preclude that he is delusional.
Regardless, you don’t file lawsuit making provable FALSE claims. You can go to jail for that.
But however it turns out and whatever the truth, it will have been MORE than worth it because of the spoof video in post 15. I had tears in my eyes I was laughing so hard.
This whole thing smells like nothing but a promotion for www.whitehouse.com.
The guy suddenly appears on their website, files a suit, and $100,000 is offered up for a bogus test, a polygraph.
I doubt that there is really any $100,000 changing hands.
Considering he has offered up receipts and the limo driver, the polygraph is only part of the case.
“When he passes, the media will be forced to ask BO some embarrasing queations.”
Why will the MSM be forced to do anything? They do whatever they want, and I predict they will never ask BO those questions.
This is dumb......and waaaay too soon..........
Well it coincides with the start of the Rezko trial... get the popcorn...
To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Sinclair has presented no documentation whatsoever of his claims regarding Mr. Obama.
I said he has offered it, not presented it.
This production brought to you by Larry Flynt.... (it positively reeks of him).
Precisely, Watson.
Don’t let Clinton hatred blind you to how really bad Obama is.
Pissant, I love you, but you’re acting kookish. This Sinclair guy is clearly schizophrenic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.