Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abbey Body Identified As Gay Lover Of Edward II
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-18-2008 | Laura Clout

Posted on 02/17/2008 6:44:21 PM PST by blam

Abbey body identified as gay lover of Edward II

By Laura Clout
Last Updated: 1:06am GMT 18/02/2008

A mutilated body found in an abbey graveyard has been identified as that of a notorious medieval villain rumoured to have been the gay lover of Edward II.

The remains, which bear the hallmarks of having been hanged, drawn and quartered, are thought to be those of Sir Hugh Despenser the Younger, who was executed as a traitor in 1326.

Sir Hugh was executed after Edward II [above] was deposed from the throne in 1326

Sir Hugh had been favourite of Edward II - who was widely believed to have been homosexual - but was brutally executed before a mob after the king was ousted from the throne.

The decapitated remains, buried at Hulton Abbey, Staffs, have intrigued experts since they were uncovered during the 1970s and now Mary Lewis, an anthropologist, says she has uncovered compelling evidence of their true identity.

The manner of execution, carbon-dating of the bones, and the absence of several parts of the body all point towards Sir Hugh being the victim, she said.

"If the remains are those of Sir Hugh Despenser the Younger, then this is the first time such an execution victim has been identified," she added.

Sir Hugh insinuated himself into the king's favour by backing him in his battles with the barons. Through a series of ruthless deals, he consolidated a huge fortune, winning himself a legion of enemies in the process, including Edward's wife, Queen Isabella.

His downfall came when the queen and her ally, Roger Mortimer, deposed the king in 1326.

Sir Hugh was judged a traitor and a thief. He was hanged and, still conscious, castrated, disembowelled and then quartered before his head was displayed on London Bridge.

Miss Lewis, a biological anthropologist at the University of Reading, found that the Staffordshire skeleton had been beheaded and chopped into several pieces with a sharp blade, suggesting a ritual killing.

There was also evidence of a stab wound to the stomach.

She said: "This form of public execution was high theatre that aimed to demonstrate the power of government to the masses. High treason dictated that the perpetrator should suffer more than one death."

Radiocarbon analysis dated the remains to between 1050 and 1385 and subsequent tests suggested that the male was over 34 years old. Sir Hugh was 40 when he was killed.

"Dating of the Hulton Abbey skeleton indicates that he died no later that 1385, when this brutal and very public form of execution was handed out only to the most notorious political prisoners. This suggests that the skeleton at Hulton Abbey was a well-known political figure," Miss Lewis added.

Sir Hugh's wife asked for his bones to be buried on his family's Gloucestershire estate but only the head, a thigh bone and a few vertebrae were returned to her. These are the bones that are missing from the Hulton Abbey skeleton.

In addition, the abbey formed part of the estate of Sir Hugh's brother-in-law, Hugh Audley, and it is thought the family may have chosen to bury what remained of their disgraced relative there.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abby; edwardii; gay; godsgravesglyphs; loveredwardii; royals; ruinseizethee; ruthlessking; villains
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: SevenofNine

<>< read


41 posted on 02/17/2008 7:28:55 PM PST by SnarlinCubBear (~~~ Give thanks with a joyful heart ~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam

“She said: “This form of public execution was high theatre that aimed to demonstrate the power of government to the masses”

Nice bit of sociologist BS coming out here - this guy was disliked by the entire nobility from what I have read and the manner of his death was more likely to give satisfaction to them, as well as high theatre.


42 posted on 02/17/2008 7:32:16 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Edward’s father was Edward I, also known as “Longshanks.” Both characters were seen in Mel Gibson’s film “Braveheart.” Edward II’s homosexual tendencies were shown in the film, although I doubt the episode of the King’s tossing his son’s lover out the window actually occurred.


43 posted on 02/17/2008 7:32:42 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

“He was hanged and, still conscious, castrated, disembowelled and then quartered before his head was displayed on London Bridge.”

That’s gotta hurt!


44 posted on 02/17/2008 7:33:27 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

I think Isabella was about 3 year-old when Wallace was killed, so it is unlikely that Wallace got her as was suggested in the movie.


45 posted on 02/17/2008 7:34:10 PM PST by Hiddigeigei (Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder. [Arnold Toynbee])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

LOL.

Possibly the inspiration for Monty Python’s Roman general, bigus d*us


46 posted on 02/17/2008 7:34:41 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sir Hugh’s father’s name was Pez.


47 posted on 02/17/2008 7:35:24 PM PST by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
There are plenty of cases of homosexual men siring children, so Edward III could have been a son of Edward II.

James VI & I was another one and he had several children.

48 posted on 02/17/2008 7:35:43 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam

bookmark


49 posted on 02/17/2008 7:37:35 PM PST by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

50 posted on 02/17/2008 7:37:47 PM PST by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

In weird way that my fav scene MONK LOL!

It kind weird that NUMBER 6 from the Prisoner threw the guy out of the window SHEESH


51 posted on 02/17/2008 7:39:44 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: blam

DNA is a BITCH!


52 posted on 02/17/2008 7:41:10 PM PST by Libloather (February is Liberal Awareness Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

ping


53 posted on 02/17/2008 7:42:31 PM PST by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

Why couldn’t Edward II have done his weekly bed duty with Isabella? I have never seen anything either way on this from historical sources.

One look at the reign of Edward III and the career of his eldest son quickly leads one to connect him with his grandfather, Edward I.


54 posted on 02/17/2008 7:45:28 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers

Don’t want to ruin the book for you but you are on the right track.


55 posted on 02/17/2008 7:45:51 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 8 days away from outliving Junkyard Dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
Brokeback Palace, coming soon to a kingdom near you.
56 posted on 02/17/2008 7:48:38 PM PST by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Was that the same Mortimer who got into Nottingham Castle via a tunnel in the Castle Rock, known as Mortimer’s Hole?


57 posted on 02/17/2008 7:50:40 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hiddigeigei

as with any ‘historical’ hollywood movie - the history part ends with the names of people involved. The rest is total fiction.


58 posted on 02/17/2008 7:50:48 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; blam
The red hot poker served a triple function: a painful death for the king, a symbolically appropriate death for the king, and a manner of killing him that could be kept hidden from the public, since when his corpse was put on view at his funeral, there were no outward signs of how he died.

Grisly detail:

I read that to ensure no outward mark of the manner of his killing, a (hollow) horn was first inserted to insulate the rectum from the hot iron.

59 posted on 02/17/2008 7:51:11 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
"Ah, he was an idiot alright, but he didn’t deserve that. Ugh". Nobody deserves that. Yes, it doesn't do to compete for Queen. Imagine if these guys all came to our time? There wouldn't be enough stakes to go around. San Francisco alone would empty the a forest. Is it my imagination, and I'm serious here, but is that portrait doing a Some Like it Hot with the lips thing?
60 posted on 02/17/2008 7:51:50 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson