Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
AP ^ | 02-14-2008 | AP

Posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:45 AM PST by montag813

WASHINGTON - U.S. officials say the Pentagon is planning to shoot down a broken spy satellite expected to hit the Earth in early March.

This is the U.S. military will use a missile to destroy a satellite in space, NBC News reports.

The spy satellite has lost all power and is expected to crash back on earth in early March, spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; bmd; dod; interceptor; lockheed; missile; missiledefense; nasa; pentagon; raytheon; satellite; sm3; usn; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: Cletus.D.Yokel

IM transcript:

PutinKremlin3: d00d! u shot my sat!

WThePrez: p0wn3d! LOL

PutinKremlin3:u r teh suq

WThePrez: all ur sats are belong to us


41 posted on 02/14/2008 9:32:03 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: saganite
>Anybody who puts a functioning satellite in orbit would be my first guess but I could be wrong

Don't worry -- Freepers
always put their satellites
in high orbit and

design their birds with
active defense protocols . . .
The forum is safe.
42 posted on 02/14/2008 9:32:26 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Everything on Earth orbit will come down sooner or later.


43 posted on 02/14/2008 9:33:18 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!

I don't know how to tell you this, but vacuum cleaners don't work in a vacuum.

44 posted on 02/14/2008 9:33:22 AM PST by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Nope. Venezuelans perhaps.


45 posted on 02/14/2008 9:35:21 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, because the information released was Sensitive Compartmented Information.


46 posted on 02/14/2008 9:35:37 AM PST by coloradan (The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Maybe we should just hire the Chinese to shoot down the broken satilite...you know jobs Americans wont do.
47 posted on 02/14/2008 9:38:41 AM PST by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Since it’s our money paying for this, we need good, cool video.


48 posted on 02/14/2008 9:38:43 AM PST by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl
Time for someone to invent a new space vacuum cleaner!!

I don't think a vacuum cleaner would work in a vacuum. But I was just thinking about that very thing -- how about several satellites sweeping around the earth with big aerogel panels on the front? That should capture the smaller particles.

49 posted on 02/14/2008 9:39:26 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

xlnt


50 posted on 02/14/2008 9:40:50 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: montag813

cool!


51 posted on 02/14/2008 9:41:04 AM PST by RDTF (kill the terrorists, punch the hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
Right out of a Tom Clancy novel.

Except that in Red Storm Rising, it was a modified air intercept missile fired from a fighter, an F18, IIRC.

52 posted on 02/14/2008 9:41:46 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

It isnt the fuel, its the payload


53 posted on 02/14/2008 9:42:33 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: montag813
"Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific."

Ha! I bet they use a spark in the center fuel tank...

54 posted on 02/14/2008 9:43:32 AM PST by Ignatz ( RENT THIS SPACE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I’m of the opinion that they should (should have):

- retrieved the satellite via a Shuttle mission
- placed rocket motors to the satellites to force either a controlled re-entry or send it to the sun.
- shoot it down upon re-entry

55 posted on 02/14/2008 9:44:36 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

How do these satellites normally return to Earth?


56 posted on 02/14/2008 9:46:23 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Depends on when and where they hit it. If they wait until the satellite is low enough that it's beginning to contact the atmosphere, then most of the little pieces resulting from a missile strike will burn up pretty quickly.

I would think -- and I admit I'm no physicist -- that it would depend in what direction it's hit. If it's hit directly from below, that might blow the debris back upward. But if it's hit obliquely from behind -- ideally behind and above, it they can target the missile that precisely -- then it would drive the debris downward, where it will burn up in the atmosphere.

57 posted on 02/14/2008 9:47:41 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Won’t this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?

Only of we shoot it down while it's still in orbit. If we fire when it's starting to bite into the atmosphere, all he pieces will deorbit too. Instead of one large object coming in, we get a meteor shower.

58 posted on 02/14/2008 9:47:42 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Ha! I bet they use a spark in the center fuel tank...

LOL

59 posted on 02/14/2008 9:48:24 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: saganite

“Didn’t we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?”

Yeah, but this is different.

It’s one of our spy satellites, and we don’t want it to crash in an “unfriendly” country such as russia or china where they’ll be able to glean info from it.

We also don’t want it to crash in the middle east since it carries radioactive materials that could end up being used in a dirty bomb.

And because of the radioactive materials onboard, we don’t exactly want it crashing in our backyard or crashing into someone’s house either.

The best option would be to blow it up.


60 posted on 02/14/2008 9:49:04 AM PST by 2CAVTrooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson